膨胀土膨胀性及强度特性分析
Expansion and Strength Characterization of Expansive Soils
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2025.146169, PDF,   
作者: 孙啸宇:沧州水利勘测规划设计院有限公司,河北 沧州
关键词: 膨胀土膨胀率强度Expansive Soil Expansion Ratio Strength
摘要: 本文所用土壤取自南水北调中线工程邓州段,通过自由膨胀率试验得出所用的膨胀土为弱膨胀土,其有荷膨胀率随时间的增长先快速增大后趋于稳定,随荷载的增大不断减小;在无侧限抗压试验中,九种含水率下土体的应力应变曲线均为软化型,其应力应变曲线可以分为弹性阶段–裂纹稳定扩展阶段–裂纹快速扩展阶段–和裂纹完全贯通阶段;膨胀土的无侧限抗压强度随含水率的增大不断下降;在直接剪切试验中以18%含水率为分界线,含水率小于18%时应力应变曲线为软化型,含水率大于18%时为硬化型,抗剪强度随含水率增大先增大后减小,粘聚力随含水率的变化规律也是随含水率的增大先增大后减小,内摩擦角则是随含水率的增大不断减小。
Abstract: The soil used in this paper is taken from the Dengzhou section of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, and the expansion soil used is a weakly expanding soil through the free expansion rate test, and its loaded expansion rate increases rapidly with time and then tends to stabilize, and then decreases with the increase of load; in the unconfined compression test, the stress-strain curves of the soil body under the nine water contents are all of the soft type, and the stress-strain curves can be divided into elasticity stages Stable crack expansion stage-Rapid crack expansion stage—and complete crack penetration stage; The unconfined compressive strength of expansive soil decreases with the increase of water content; In the direct shear test, 18% water content is used as the dividing line, and the stress-strain curves are of softening type when the water content is less than 18%, and the stress-strain curves are of softening type when the water content is greater than 18%. In direct shear test, the stress-strain curve is softening type when the water content is less than 18%, and hardening type when the water content is more than 18%, the shear strength increases and then decreases with the increase of water content, the change rule of cohesion with the increase of water content also increases and then decreases, and the angle of internal friction is decreasing with the increase of water content.
文章引用:孙啸宇. 膨胀土膨胀性及强度特性分析[J]. 土木工程, 2025, 14(6): 1567-1575. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2025.146169

参考文献

[1] 吴广水, 王书齐, 祝婷梅, 等. 初始含水率和干密度对膨胀土膨胀力影响的试验研究[J]. 河南工程学院学报(自然科学版), 2023, 35(4): 29-32, 50.
[2] Tan, B., Pan, Z.A., Xu, L. and Wang, J. (2024) Laboratory Investigation of Lateral Swelling Pressure of Nanning Grey-White Expansive Soil. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 60, 521-527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 李儒天. 不同改性材料改良膨胀土无侧限抗压强度的比较试验研究[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(3): 56-60.
[4] 陈圣甜, 梁文广, 闫宏锦, 等. 基于无侧限抗压强度试验的不同养护环境对水泥土强度影响研究[J]. 市政技术 2024, 42(2): 40-44.
[5] 王闯, 董金玉, 王明龙, 等. 含水率对残坡积土强度特性的影响[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报,2016, 37(5): 88-92.
[6] 孟庆云, 杨果林. 重塑膨胀土直剪试验中的应力-应变曲线特性[J]. 中南公路工程, 2007(3): 11-15, 20.
[7] 杨庆, 张慧珍, 栾茂田. 非饱和膨胀土抗剪强度的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(3): 420-425.
[8] 张海明, 姚爱军, 王兆辉, 等. 非饱和粉土力学特性的大型直剪试验[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报, 2014, 33(10): 1352-1356.
[9] 王晓燕, 高峰, 胡建林, 等. 冀北地区重塑膨胀土抗剪强度影响因素分析[J]. 河北建筑工程学院学报, 2023, 41(1): 69-74.
[10] 詹良通, 吴宏伟. 非饱和膨胀土变形和强度特性的三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006(2): 196-201.
[11] 候雅东, 王锋, 谢东武. 含水率和基质吸力变化对非饱和粉质土的影响分析[J]. 甘肃科学学报, 2021, 33(5): 71-77.
[12] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 等. 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[13] 陈国强. 压实大理石废粉的微观结构及持水特性[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2022.
[14] 丁小刚, 马丽娜, 张戎令, 等. 非饱和重塑弱膨胀土微观结构及土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(1): 350-360.