论我国证券法上的投资者保护制度——投资者保护机构先行赔付研究
On the Investor Protection System in Chinese Securities—Research on Investor Protection Organization’s Advance Payment
摘要: 本文探讨了我国证券法下投资者保护机构在先行赔付机制中的作用。首先阐释先行赔付的含义、适用条件及主体,指出其具有民事和解性质,适用范围涵盖欺诈发行、虚假陈述等法定情形及“其他重大违法行为”兜底情形,责任主体包括发行人及其控股股东、保荐机构等。研究发现,投资者保护机构在机制中承担基金管理、方案执行等职能,但存在程序启动依赖自愿委托、适用情形范围限缩、机构职责交叉、追偿权规则模糊等局限。为此,提出借鉴美国“公平基金”模式拓宽资金来源,明确投保基金执行主体定位以厘清机构分工,规范追偿权行使并合理设定破产清偿顺位,推动先行赔付机制从个案试点向常态化、系统化保护机制转型。
Abstract: This paper discusses the role of the investor protection organization in the first compensation mechanism under Chinese securities law. Firstly, it explains the meaning, applicable conditions and main body of the first compensation, pointing out that it has the nature of civil settlement, the scope of application covers fraudulent issuance, misrepresentation and other statutory circumstances and “other major violations” of the pocket situation, the main body of the responsibility includes the issuer and its controlling shareholders, sponsoring organizations and so on. The study found that the investor protection agencies in the mechanism to undertake fund management, program implementation and other functions, but the operation of its procedures rely on voluntary commissioning, the scope of application of the circumstances limited to the scope of the agency's responsibilities, cross, the right to recovery rules and other vague limitations. Based on this, it is proposed to draw on the model of “Fair Fund” in the United States to broaden the source of funds, clarify the positioning of the executive body of the investment fund in order to clarify the division of labor among institutions, regulate the exercise of the right of recovery and reasonably set the bankruptcy liquidation position, and promote the transformation of the mechanism of advance payment from a case-by-case pilot to a regularized and systematic protection mechanism.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
姚一凡. 保荐人先行赔付制度的解读与反思[J]. 金融法苑, 2018(1): 62-72.
|
|
[2]
|
李翔宇. 证券市场先行赔付的实践检视与规范分析——以投资者保护为视角[J]. 甘肃金融, 2020(8): 30-34.
|
|
[3]
|
赵吟. 证券市场先行赔付的理论疏解与规则进路[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 24(3): 25-33.
|
|
[4]
|
郑观. 证券市场先行赔付无因契约属性之理论证成[J]. 北方法学, 2023, 17(1): 100-112.
|
|
[5]
|
汪金钗. 先行赔付制度的构建与探索——兼评《证券法》第九十三条[J]. 南方金融, 2020(6): 91-99.
|
|
[6]
|
王萍. 证券市场先行赔付制度研究[J]. 清华金融法律评论, 2022(0): 199-226.
|
|
[7]
|
袁康. 投资者保护基金先行赔付制度的反思与重构[J]. 中国法学, 2023(3): 203-224.
|
|
[8]
|
金钟超. 证券市场先行赔付制度分析——以《证券法》第93条为线索[J]. 福建金融管理干部学院学报, 2021(3): 24-30.
|
|
[9]
|
杨光. 中国证券投资者保护基金的再定位[J]. 上海金融, 2014(10): 47-52.
|
|
[10]
|
郭艳芳. 新《证券法》下先行赔付对象的确定机制探讨[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(1): 142-146.
|
|
[11]
|
张文灼. 投资者保护机构先行赔付制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2021.
|
|
[12]
|
王为雄. 投资者保护机构之构建——以美日证券立法为视角[J]. 山西省政法管理干部学院学报, 2021, 34(1): 54-57.
|
|
[13]
|
郭雳. 证券执法中的公共补偿——美国公平基金制度的探析与借鉴[J]. 清华法学, 2018, 12(6): 59-78.
|
|
[14]
|
席涛. 证券行政和解制度分析[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(3): 112-126.
|
|
[15]
|
赵学丽, 杨世琴. 投资者保护机构的职能与定位[J]. 中国集体经济, 2021(25): 42-43.
|
|
[16]
|
张东昌. 证券市场先行赔付制度的法律构造——以投资者保护基金为中心[J]. 证券市场导报, 2015(2): 65-71.
|
|
[17]
|
李狮狮. 证券市场先行赔付制度的适用问题与完善建议[J]. 西部学刊, 2022(17): 72-75.
|
|
[18]
|
黄梨珊. 论证券市场先行赔付制度的完善[J]. 市场周刊, 2021(5): 150-152.
|