调节定向、权力感、框架类型对风险决策的影响
The Influence of Regulation Targeted, Sense of Power, and Framework Type on Risk Decision-Making
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.156388, PDF,   
作者: 张 岳:内蒙古师范大学心理学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;陈 明:宜都市实验小学育才路校区,湖北 宜都
关键词: 调节定向权力感框架类型风险决策Regulatory Orientation Sense of Power Frame Type Risk Decision-Making
摘要: 随着社会经济环境复杂性的增加,风险决策研究在组织管理、公共政策等领域的应用价值日益凸显。本研究聚焦调节定向理论、权力感理论与框架效应的交叉领域,旨在揭示三者对风险决策行为的协同作用机制,并首次通过实验进行研究,为提升个体决策理性与组织风险管理效能提供理论依据。研究经过筛选共得到48份数据,然后进行方差分析。经过数据分析得到以下结论:风险决策受框架类型、调节定向和权力感的共同影响:收益框架下个体更冒险,但调节定向和权力感会显著调节这一效应。促进定向个体在收益框架下冒险倾向最高,而高权力感个体在损失框架下更倾向于风险寻求。
Abstract: With the increasing complexity of the social and economic environment, the application value of risk decision-making research in fields such as organizational management and public policy has become increasingly prominent. This study focuses on the intersection of the Regulatory Focus Theory, the Theory of Power Sense, and the Framing Effect, aiming to reveal the synergy mechanism of the three on risk decision-making behaviors, and conducts the research for the first time through experiments, providing theoretical basis for enhancing individual decision-making rationality and organizational risk management efficiency. After screening, a total of 48 data were obtained, and then a variance analysis was conducted. Through data analysis, the following conclusions were drawn: Risk decision-making is jointly influenced by the framing type, regulatory focus, and power sense: Individuals are more adventurous under the gain framing, but regulatory focus and power sense will significantly moderate this effect. Promoting focus individuals have the highest tendency to be adventurous under the gain framing, while high power sense individuals are more inclined to seek risks under the loss framing.
文章引用:张岳, 陈明 (2025). 调节定向、权力感、框架类型对风险决策的影响. 心理学进展, 15(6), 380-388. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.156388

参考文献

[1] 段锦云, 黄彩云(2013). 个人权力感对进谏行为的影响机制: 权力认知的视角. 心理学报, 45(2), 217-230.
[2] 何伟, 黄淳, 王艳萍(1998). 风险决策与寻找理论. 中央民族大学学报(自然科学版), 7(1), 31-36.
[3] 靳菲, 朱华伟(2016). 消费者的权力感与冲动购买. 心理学报,48(7), 880-890.
[4] 刘耀中, 谢宜均, 彭滨, 倪亚琨(2018). 权力具身效应的影响因素及机制. 心理学探新, 38(1), 25-30.
[5] 刘耀中, 杨长华(2012). 风险决策偏好的ERPs研究. 西北师范大学学报(社会科学版), 49(2), 128-132.
[6] 王晨(2018). 孤独感对风险决策的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 暨南大学.
[7] 韦庆旺, 俞国良(2009). 权力的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17(6), 1336-1343.
[8] 闫鸿磊(2012). 权力感与移情对暴力态度的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[9] 杨驰(2018). 力感对合作的影响——控制感的中介和支配性动机的调节作用. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 暨南大学.
[10] 杨杏(2017). 亲社会价值取向和权力感对共情的影响. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 四川师范大学.
[11] 张琴, 杜秀芳, 王修欣(2016). 权力感和任务难度对个体建议采纳的影响. 心理科学, 39(5), 1184-1189.
[12] 钟毅平, 张珊明, 陈芸(2013). 不同权力者人际敏感性的差异. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(1), 62-65.
[13] 庄锦英(2006). 影响情绪一致性效应的因素. 心理科学, (5), 1104-1106.
[14] Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013). The Teenage Brain: Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 114-120.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The Experience of Power: Examining the Effects of Power on Approach and Inhibition Tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The Personal Sense of Power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313-344.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Coombs, C. H., & Huang, L. (1970). Tests of a Portfolio Theory of Risk Preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 23-29.[CrossRef
[18] DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does Power Corrupt or Enable? When and Why Power Facilitates Self-Interested Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681-689.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1990). The Effect of Framing on Choice: Interactions with Risk-Taking Propensity, Cognitive Style, and Sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 496-510.[CrossRef
[20] Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling Other People: The Impact of Power on Stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.[CrossRef
[21] Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Guinote, A. (2007). Behaviour Variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 256-295.[CrossRef
[23] Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, Approach, and Inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Kuo, K., Chuang, S., Huang, M. C., & Wu, P. (2019). Fit or Not? Bringing Regulatory Fit into the Frame on Health Food Preferences. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31, 1388-1404.[CrossRef
[25] Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The Social Distance Theory of Power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Overbeck, J. R., Neale, M. A., & Govan, C. L. (2010). I Feel, Therefore You Act: Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Effects of Emotion on Negotiation as a Function of Social Power. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 126-139.[CrossRef
[27] Rucker, D. D., Hu, M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The Experience versus the Expectations of Power: A Recipe for Altering the Effects of Power on Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 381-396.[CrossRef
[28] Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You Focus on the Forest When You’re in Charge of the Trees: Power Priming and Abstract Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578-596.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Wang, Z., Kuang, Y., Tang, H., Gao, C., Chen, A., & Chan, K. Q. (2018). Are Decisions Made by Group Representatives More Risk Averse? The Effect of Sense of Responsibility. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 311-323.[CrossRef
[30] Weller, J. A., & Tikir, A. (2011). Predicting Domain‐Specific Risk Taking with the HEXACO Personality Structure. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 180-201.[CrossRef
[31] Whalley, K. (2017). Making Hasty Decisions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 569-569.[CrossRef] [PubMed]