养老型与育幼型随迁老人的代际支持比较研究
A Comparative Study of Intergenerational Support between Elderly Care-Oriented and Childcare-Oriented Relocating Older Adults
摘要: 随迁老人的代际支持问题已成为中国老龄化社会的重要议题,但既有研究较少关注其内部异质性。本研究采用质性研究方法,通过对8位养老型与育幼型随迁老人的深度访谈,运用Colaizzi现象学分析法,系统地比较了两类群体代际支持状况的异同。研究发现:经济支持层面,养老型偏向单向依赖子女供给;育幼型则呈现以劳代酬的双向交换模式。生活照料层面,养老型以自我照料为主,甚至反向照顾子女;育幼型照料模式表现为责任伦理主导下的代际互助与失衡共存。精神慰藉层面,两类老人均存在情感表达内敛与交流浅层化的特点,但育幼型通过跨代相处实现隐性情感补偿,养老型则依赖社区同辈网络。研究揭示了不同迁移动机下的随迁老人代际支持状况的异同,为引导家庭成员形成良性支持机制,完善差异化养老服务政策提供依据。
Abstract: The issue of intergenerational support for the relocated elderly has become an important topic in China’s aging society, but established studies have paid less attention to their internal heterogeneity. This study adopts a qualitative research method to systematically compare the similarities and differences in the intergenerational support status of the two groups through in-depth interviews with eight elderly and child-rearing relocated elders, and utilizes Colaizzi’s phenomenological analysis. The study found that, at the level of economic support, the elderly group was more likely to rely on their children’s support, while the child-rearing group showed a two-way exchange pattern of labor instead of pay. At the level of life care, the old-age type mainly takes care of themselves and even takes care of their children in the opposite direction, while the child-raising type’s care model is characterized by intergenerational mutual support and imbalance under the ethic of responsibility. At the level of spiritual comfort, both types of elderly are characterized by introverted emotional expression and shallow communication, but the child-rearing type realizes implicit emotional compensation through intergenerational relationships, while the elderly type relies on community peer networks. The study reveals the similarities and differences in the intergenerational support status of the relocated elderly under different migration motives, and provides a basis for guiding family members to form a benign support mechanism and improve the differentiated elderly service policies.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
庄曦. 建构社会支持网络 促进随迁老人融入[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2020-03-24(002).
|
|
[2]
|
李敏芳. 随迁老人社会适应研究述评[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2014, 2(6): 20-27.
|
|
[3]
|
费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1983(3): 7-16.
|
|
[4]
|
刘明. Colaizzi七个步骤在现象学研究资料分析中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(11): 90-92.
|
|
[5]
|
翟振武, 冯阳. 当今随迁老人家庭融入中的矛盾冲突及应对[J]. 中州学刊, 2023(2): 91-96.
|
|
[6]
|
李静雅, 林悦盈. 随迁祖辈家庭代际关系的类型学研究——以厦门市为例[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(6): 139-154.
|
|
[7]
|
李飞飞, 李天成. 家庭隔代抚育与农村中老年人主观幸福感[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 23(6): 103-116.
|
|
[8]
|
汪斌, 周骥腾. 中国老年人家庭代际经济支持模式研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 37(2): 88-95.
|
|
[9]
|
陆晋文. 关于随迁老人社会保障现状的调查报告——基于南京市主城区的调查[J]. 劳动保障世界, 2019(32): 26.
|
|
[10]
|
李晓宁. 隔代照料与老年人劳动供给研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国社会科学院研究生院, 2022.
|
|
[11]
|
刘佩瑶. 城市随迁老人养老资源供给模式研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2015.
|
|
[12]
|
邢阳春. 城市社区随迁老人养老资源供求分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
|
|
[13]
|
李连友, 李磊, 邓依伊. 发达国家家庭养老公共政策的理论逻辑、内容属性与经验启示[J]. 社会保障研究, 2020(6): 57-67.
|
|
[14]
|
孙玉环, 王如玉, 董莹. 隔代照料对中老年人劳动供给的影响及内在机制分析[J]. 劳动经济研究, 2022, 10(3): 26-43.
|
|
[15]
|
王智灿. 代际支持对老年劳动供给的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江财经大学, 2021.
|
|
[16]
|
郑素侠, 吴德琛. 代际传播数字沟的形成背景、社会影响及其调适[J]. 中州学刊, 2018(9): 161-165.
|
|
[17]
|
Yu, Y., Li, D. and Xia, Y. (2024) Applying Kumpfer’s Resilience Framework to Understand the Social Adaptation Process of the Trailing Parents in China. BMC Geriatrics, 24, Article No. 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|