M1区和小脑区重复经颅磁刺激对卒中后患者下肢的影响
The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the M1 and Cerebellar Areas on Lower Limb Function in Post-Stroke
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2025.1571967, PDF,   
作者: 王 开, 陈 极, 庄明谚, 陈和木*:安徽医科大学第一附属医院康复医学科,安徽 合肥
关键词: 经颅磁刺激卒中康复下肢Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Stroke Rehabilitation Lower Extremity
摘要: 目的:探究重复经颅磁刺激作用于卒中后患者小脑区和M1区对下肢运动、平衡功能及皮层兴奋性的影响和差异性。方法:选取卒中后偏瘫患者39例为研究对象,按照计算机随机分组分为假刺激组、M1组和小脑组,每组13例,干预组进行相应靶点低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗、常规药物及康复治疗,假刺激组除外常规药物及康复治疗,予以假磁刺激治疗。结果:三组患者治疗前FMA-LE量表评分、BBS量表评分、坐站行走测试时间、10米步行测试时间、双侧足底压力对称指数、身体压力中心摆动面积无显著差异(p > 0.05),治疗后三组患者指标均较治疗前有所改善(p < 0.05),干预组量表评分均优于假刺激组(p < 0.05),且小脑组在站立及步行中平衡改善优于假刺激组(p < 0.05)。结论:M1区和小脑区低频rTMS均能有效改善卒中后患者的下肢功能,而小脑区刺激对下肢平衡功能的恢复效果更佳。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects and differences of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the cerebellar region and M1 area on lower limb motor function, balance function, and cortical excitability in post-stroke patients. Methods: Thirty-nine hemiplegic patients after stroke were randomly divided into three groups (sham stimulation group, M1 group, and cerebellar group) with 13 cases each. The intervention groups received low-frequency rTMS targeting specific regions combined with routine medication and rehabilitation therapy, while the sham stimulation group received sham magnetic stimulation without routine treatments. Results: No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in baseline FMA-LE scores, BBS scores, time up and go Test duration, 10-meter walk test duration, plantar pressure symmetry index, or center of pressure sway area among the three groups. Post-treatment improvements were observed in all groups (p < 0.05), with intervention groups demonstrating superior scale scores compared to the sham group (p < 0.05). The cerebellar group showed better balance improvement during standing and walking than the sham group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both M1 and cerebellar low-frequency rTMS effectively improve lower limb function in post-stroke patients, with cerebellar stimulation demonstrating superior efficacy in restoring balance function.
文章引用:王开, 陈极, 庄明谚, 陈和木. M1区和小脑区重复经颅磁刺激对卒中后患者下肢的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(7): 132-140. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1571967

参考文献

[1] GBD 2021 Stroke Risk Factor Collaborators (2024) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Stroke and Its Risk Factors, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Neurology, 23, 973-1003.
[2] Anwar, N., Karimi, H., Ahmad, A., Mumtaz, N., Saqulain, G. and Gilani, S.A. (2021) A Novel Virtual Reality Training Strategy for Poststroke Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, Article ID: 6598726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Dai, S., Piscicelli, C., Clarac, E., Baciu, M., Hommel, M. and Pérennou, D. (2021) Balance, Lateropulsion, and Gait Disorders in Subacute Stroke. Neurology, 96, 2147-2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Bower, K., Thilarajah, S., Pua, Y., Williams, G., Tan, D., Mentiplay, B., et al. (2019) Dynamic Balance and Instrumented Gait Variables Are Independent Predictors of Falls Following Stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 16, Article No. 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Wu, W., Zhou, C., Wang, Z., Chen, G., Chen, X., Jin, H., et al. (2020) Effect of Early and Intensive Rehabilitation after Ischemic Stroke on Functional Recovery of the Lower Limbs: A Pilot, Randomized Trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29, Article ID: 104649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Lee, D. and Bae, Y. (2022) Interactive Videogame Improved Rehabilitation Motivation and Walking Speed in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Dual-Center Controlled Trial. Games for Health Journal, 11, 268-274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Janssen, A.M., Oostendorp, T.F. and Stegeman, D.F. (2015) The Coil Orientation Dependency of the Electric Field Induced by TMS for M1 and Other Brain Areas. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 12, Article No. 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Parikh, V., Medley, A. and Goh, H. (2024) Effects of rTMS to Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellum on Balance Control in Healthy Adults. European Journal of Neuroscience, 60, 3984-3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Chen, Q., Yao, F., Sun, H., Chen, Z., Ke, J., Liao, J., et al. (2021) Combining Inhibitory and Facilitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Treatment Improves Motor Function by Modulating GABA in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 39, 419-434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Bai, Z., Zhang, J. and Fong, K.N.K. (2022) Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Modulating Cortical Excitability in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19, Article No. 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Gao, Q., Xie, Y., Chen, Y., Tan, H., Guo, Q. and Lau, B. (2021) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Lower Extremity Motor Function in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Neural Regeneration Research, 16, 1168-1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Palesi, F., De Rinaldis, A., Castellazzi, G., Calamante, F., Muhlert, N., Chard, D., et al. (2017) Contralateral Cortico-Ponto-Cerebellar Pathways Reconstruction in Humans in Vivo: Implications for Reciprocal Cerebro-Cerebellar Structural Connectivity in Motor and Non-Motor Areas. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 12841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhu, P., Li, Z., Lu, Q., Nie, Y., Liu, H., Kiernan, E., et al. (2024) Can Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Improve Balance Function and Gait in Stroke Patients? A Randomized Controlled Trial. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 60, 391-399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019 [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(9): 710-715.
[15] Koch, G., Bonnì, S., Casula, E.P., Iosa, M., Paolucci, S., Pellicciari, M.C., et al. (2019) Effect of Cerebellar Stimulation on Gait and Balance Recovery in Patients with Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurology, 76, 170-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Liao, L., Xie, Y., Chen, Y. and Gao, Q. (2020) Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Combined with Physiotherapy in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 35, 23-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Cristine de Faria, L., Barbosa Marques, D., Hellen dos Santos Cerqueira Gomes, L., dos Anjos, S. and Pereira, N.D. (2022) Self-Reported Use of the Paretic Lower Extremity of People with Stroke: A Reliability and Validity Study of the Lower-Extremity Motor Activity Log (LE-MAL)—Brazil. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 39, 1727-1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Blum, L. and Korner-Bitensky, N. (2008) Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Physical Therapy, 88, 559-566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Ortega-Bastidas, P., Gómez, B., Aqueveque, P., Luarte-Martínez, S. and Cano-de-la-Cuerda, R. (2023) Instrumented Timed up and Go Test (ITUG)—More than Assessing Time to Predict Falls: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 23, Article No. 3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Cheng, D.K., Nelson, M., Brooks, D. and Salbach, N.M. (2019) Validation of Stroke-Specific Protocols for the 10-Meter Walk Test and 6-Minute Walk Test Conducted Using 15-Meter and 30-Meter Walkways. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 27, 251-261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Liao, L., Zhu, Y., Peng, Q., Gao, Q., Liu, L., Wang, Q., et al. (2023) Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for Stroke: Primary Motor Cortex versus Cerebellar Stimulation: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Stroke, 55, 156-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Grimaldi, G., Argyropoulos, G.P., Boehringer, A., Celnik, P., Edwards, M.J., Ferrucci, R., et al. (2013) Non-Invasive Cerebellar Stimulation—A Consensus Paper. The Cerebellum, 13, 121-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Holdefer, R.N., Miller, L.E., Chen, L.L. and Houk, J.C. (2000) Functional Connectivity between Cerebellum and Primary Motor Cortex in the Awake Monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 585-590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Taib, N.O.B., Manto, M., Laute, M. and Brotchi, J. (2005) The Cerebellum Modulates Rodent Cortical Motor Output after Repetitive Somatosensory Stimulation. Neurosurgery, 56, 811-820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Farias da Guarda, S.N. and Conforto, A.B. (2014) Effects of Somatosensory Stimulation on Corticomotor Excitability in Patients with Unilateral Cerebellar Infarcts and Healthy Subjects—Preliminary Results. Cerebellum & Ataxias, 1, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Tanaka, M., Kameda, M. and Okada, K. (2024) Temporal Information Processing in the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia. In: Merchant, H. and de Lafuente, V., Eds., Neurobiology of Interval Timing, Springer International Publishing, 95-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Gopalakrishnan, R., Cunningham, D.A., Hogue, O., Schroedel, M., Campbell, B.A., Baker, K.B., et al. (2024) Electrophysiological Correlates of Dentate Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Poststroke Motor Recovery. The Journal of Neuroscience, 44, e2149232024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]