浙江近海表层沉积物粒度参数图解法和矩法计算成果的对比研究
Comparative Study on the Graphic and Moment Methods Results for Calculating the Grain Size Parameters of Surface Sediments in the Zhejiang Offshore Area
摘要: 海底沉积物采用矩法计算粒度参数逐渐普遍,根据浙江近海表层沉积物采样测试资料,对研究区图解法和矩法粒度参数结果进行对比研究。结果表明:浙江近海表层沉积物图解法与矩法得出的平均粒径相关性显著,可以通用,分选系数能够相互换算,偏态和峰态相关性较差,在一定程度上可以互相转换。将沉积物分为砂质沉积、混合沉积和泥质沉积,针对特定的沉积物类型,两种方法的粒度参数对比仍有一定规律,可以建立转换关系。砂质沉积粒级较为集中,粒级分布曲线较为接近正态分布,其偏态和峰态相关性较高,而对于混合沉积和泥质沉积,粒级分布曲线比较复杂多变,尾部含量较高,造成矩法和图解法结果差异较大,二者的换算关系较差。图解法与矩法计算成果的转换关系可以用于该区沉积特征和沉积环境的研究。
Abstract: The use of the moment method to calculate the grain-size parameters of seafloor sediments is gradually becoming common, and the results of the graphic method and the moment method were compared in the study area according to the sampling and testing data of the surface sediments in the Zhejiang offshore area. The results show that the grain size derived from the graphic method and the moment method are significantly correlated and can be exchanged, the sorting coefficients can be converted to each other, and the correlations between the skewness and kurtosis are relatively poor, which can be converted to each other to a certain extent. Divide the surface sediments in the study area into sandy sediment, mixed sediment and mud sediment. For a specific sediment type, there are still certain patterns in comparing the results of two methods, which can be used to establish conversion relationships. The grain size of sandy sediment is more concentrated, the grain size distribution curve is closer to normal distribution, and its skewness and kurtosis correlation is higher, while for mixed sediment and mud sediment, the grain size distribution curve is more complicated and variable, and the tail content is higher, which results in the big difference between the results of the moment method and the graphic method, and the conversion relationship between the two methods is poor. The conversion relationship between the results calculated by the graphic method and the moment method can be used for the study of sedimentary characteristics and depositional environment in this area.
文章引用:李金铎, 蒋叶娟, 余海俊. 浙江近海表层沉积物粒度参数图解法和矩法计算成果的对比研究[J]. 自然科学, 2025, 13(4): 708-715. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojns.2025.134074

参考文献

[1] 张惠兰, 李志亮. 沉积物粒度参数求解方法探讨[J]. 计量, 2008(1): 18-19.
[2] 刘志杰, 公衍芬, 周松望, 等. 海洋沉积物粒度参数3种计算方法的对比研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2013, 35(3): 181-190.
[3] 王兆夺, 于东生, 罗福生, 等. 图解法和矩法计算泉州湾表层沉积物粒度参数的对比[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32(7): 23-31.
[4] Fork, R.L. and Ward, W.C. (1957) Brazos River Bar: A study in the Significance of Grain Size Parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 27, 3-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Collias, E.E., Rona, M.R., McManus, D.A., et al. (1963) Machine Processing of Geological Data. University of Washington Press, 119-120.
[6] McManus, J. (1988) Grain Size Determination and Interpretation. In: Tucker, M., Ed., Techniques in Sedimentology, Blackwell, 63-85.
[7] 陈秀法, 冯秀丽, 刘冬雁, 等. 激光粒度分析与传统粒度分析方法相关对比[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 2002, 32(4): 608-614.
[8] 国家技术监督局. GB/T13909-92海洋调查规范——海洋地质地球物理调查[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1993.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准管理委员会. GB/T12763. 8-2007海洋调查规范——第8部分: 海洋地质地球物理调查[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[10] 国家海洋局“908”专项办公室. 我国近海海洋综合调查与评价专项—海洋底质调查技术规程[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2006.
[11] 马茜茜, 肖建华, 姚正毅. 风成沉积物3种粒度参数计算方法比较[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(4): 95-102.
[12] 陶敏, 邓山, 王婷乐, 等. 矩值法和图解法计算山区河流沉积物粒度参数的差异[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(6): 27-32.
[13] 贾建军, 高抒, 薛允传. 图解法与矩法沉积物粒度参数的对比[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2002, 23(6): 577-582.
[14] 李家彪. 东海区域地质[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2008.
[15] 赵珍清. 南黄海沉积物粒度分布参数计算方法的比较[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1992, 12(3): 95-107.
[16] 李高聪, 梁荣鑫, 仝长亮, 等. 图解法和矩值法粒度参数的定性对比: 以琼州海峡岸滩表层沉积物为例[J]. 海洋学报, 2023, 45(2): 98-109.