董事会断裂带对高管薪酬粘性的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Board Fault Zones on the Stickiness of Executive Compensation
摘要: 近年来,高级管理层的薪酬出现了“天价”和“高奖低罚”的趋势。本文基于社会认同理论,探讨董事会断裂带对高管薪酬粘性内在可能的影响方式和影响路径以及行业竞争度的调节作用,考察不同情况下董事会断裂带对高管薪酬粘性产生的影响并提出相关假设,最终以2013~2022年度沪深上市公司为研究样本,研究发现:1)董事会断裂带与高管薪酬粘性之间存在明显的正相关关系;2) 委托代理成本的增加是董事会断裂带对薪酬粘性的影响途径之一;3) 行业竞争压力减轻时,董事会断裂带对于高管薪酬粘性的影响会增强;4) 董事会断裂带对国有企业、内部控制质量较低企业的高管薪酬粘性影响更为显著。此外,相比于浅层断裂带,深层断裂带对高管薪酬粘性的影响更大。研究表明,董事会断裂带通过削弱监督职能加剧了高管薪酬粘性。基于此,本文提出了企业和监管机构两方面的对策建议,有助于提高董事会的决策效率和监督职能,减少高管薪酬粘性现象的发生。
Abstract: In recent years, executive compensation at the senior management level has exhibited a trend of “sky-high pay” and “high rewards with low penalties”. Based on social identity theory, this paper explores the potential influence mechanisms and pathways through which board fault lines affect the stickiness of executive compensation, as well as the moderating role of industry competitiveness. The study examines the impact of board fault lines on executive compensation stickiness under different conditions and proposes related hypotheses. Using a sample of listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2013 to 2022, the research findings indicate: 1) There is a significant positive correlation between board fault lines and executive compensation stickiness; 2) The increase in agency costs is one of the pathways through which board fault lines influence compensation stickiness; 3) When industry competitive pressure is reduced, the impact of board fault lines on executive compensation stickiness becomes stronger; 4) The influence of board fault lines on executive compensation stickiness is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises and companies with lower internal control quality. Furthermore, deep-level fault lines have a greater impact on executive compensation stickiness compared to shallow-level fault lines. The study suggests that board fault lines exacerbate executive compensation stickiness by weakening supervisory functions. Based on these findings, this paper proposes countermeasures for both enterprises and regulatory agencies, which can help enhance the decision-making efficiency and supervisory functions of boards, thereby reducing the occurrence of executive compensation stickiness.
文章引用:贺静, 廖昕, 刘喻. 董事会断裂带对高管薪酬粘性的影响研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2025, 14(7): 24-38. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2025.147343

参考文献

[1] Lau, D.C. and Murnighan, J.K. (1998) Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional Dynamics of Organizational Groups. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Tuggle, C.S., Schnatterly, K. and Johnson, R.A. (2010) Attention Patterns in the Boardroom: How Board Composition and Processes Affect Discussion of Entrepreneurial Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 550-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K.A., Zanutto, E.L. and Thatcher, S.M. (2009) Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance. Organization Science, 20, 35-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 叶邦银, 王璇. 董事会断裂带, 内部控制与会计信息质量[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2022, 19(1): 58-68.
[5] 梁上坤, 徐灿宇, 赵刚. 董事会断裂带与高管私有收益[J]. 经济学, 2021(1): 69-82.
[6] Ellis, A.P.J., Mai, K.M. and Christian, J.S. (2013) Examining the Asymmetrical Effects of Goal Faultlines in Groups: A Categorization-Elaboration Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 948-961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 李雄飞. 董事会多元化对国有上市企业高质量发展的影响研究[J]. 经济问题, 2022(6): 85-93.
[8] Gaver, J.J. (1998) Discussion of “Discretionary Accounting Choices and CEO Compensation”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 253-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 卢锐, 魏明海. 薪酬制定的管理层权力理论进展[J]. 经济管理, 2008, 34(1): 90-93.
[10] Khurana, I., Petacchi, R. and Tosi, H.L. (2021) CEO Incentives and Pay Stickiness: Evidence from Large US Firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101-133.
[11] Chen, Y. and Liu, S. (2019) Executive Pay Stickiness, Earnings Management and Firm Performance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 2, 153-165.
[12] 沈弋, 吕明晗, 朱佳立, 等. 浓雾下的薪酬: 空气质量与企业高管薪酬黏性[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(5): 41-51.
[13] 殷俊明, 罗丹, 李仲泽, 程晨. 集思广益还是不相为谋: 董事会断裂带与高管薪酬粘性[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 38(5): 66-76.
[14] Bunderson, J.S. and Van der Vegt, G.S. (2018) Diversity and Inequality in Management Teams: A Review and Integration of Research on Vertical and Horizontal Member Differences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 47-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Liu, X.K. and Van Peteghem, M. (2022) Management Faultlines and Management Forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39, 2517-2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 刘振杰, 胡国强. 董事会断裂带与公司双元创新[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(11): 64-76.
[17] 步丹璐, 文彩虹. 高管薪酬粘性增加了企业投资吗? [J]. 财经研究, 2013(6): 63-72.
[18] 雷宇, 郭剑花. 规则公平与员工效率——基于高管和员工薪酬粘性差距的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 33(1): 99-111.
[19] Van Peteghem, M., Bruynseels, L. and Gaeremynck, A. (2018) Beyond Diversity: A Tale of Faultlines and Frictions in the Board of Directors. The Accounting Review, 93, 339-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 徐灿宇, 李烜博, 梁上坤. 董事会断裂带与企业薪酬差距[J]. 金融研究, 2021(7): 172-189.
[21] 张汉南, 孙世敏, 马智颖. 高管薪酬粘性形成机理研究: 基于掏空视角[J]. 会计研究, 2019(4): 65-73.