不同管径的脑室穿刺引流管对高血压脑室出血患者预后的影响
The Impact of Ventriculostomy Drainage Tubes with Different Diameters on the Prognosis of Patients with Hypertensive Ventricular Hemorrhage
摘要: 目的:探讨不同管径脑室穿刺引流管(8Fr, 12Fr, 14Fr)对高血压脑室出血(Hypertensive ventricular hemorrhage, HVH)患者血肿清除效率、并发症及神经功能预后的影响。方法:将2019年1月至2024年12月三家三级医院收治的215例HVH患者随机分为三组,分别采用8Fr (A组,72例)、12Fr (B组,71例)和14Fr (C组,72例)引流管进行脑室外引流治疗,比较三组术后7天血肿清除率、90天格拉斯哥预后评分(Glasgow outcome scale, GOS)及并发症发生率。结果:B组预后良好率(GOS ≥ 4分)达65.5%,显著优于A组(48.6%)及C组(53.8%) (P = 0.023);C组血肿清除率(89.2%)显著高于A组(72.3%)和B组(84.5%) (P = 0.003)。C组颅内感染率(18.1%)与再出血率(19.4%)均显著高于A组(5.6%, 8.3%)及B组(11.3%, 12.7%) (P < 0.05),而A组导管堵塞率(25.0%)显著高于B组(9.9%)和C组(6.9%) (P = 0.001)。结论:12Fr引流管在HVH治疗中展现出最佳临床平衡性,既能有效提升血肿清除效率,又可显著降低并发症风险,是改善患者神经功能预后的优选方案。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of ventriculostomy drainage tubes with different diameters (8Fr, 12Fr, 14Fr) on hematoma clearance efficiency, complications, and neurological prognosis in patients with hypertensive ventricular hemorrhage (HVH). Methods: A total of 215 HVH patients admitted to three tertiary hospitals from January 2019 to December 2024 were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (8Fr, 72 cases), Group B (12Fr, 71 cases), and Group C (14Fr, 72 cases). The hematoma clearance rate at 7 days postoperatively, 90-day Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores, and complication rates were compared. Results: Group B achieved the highest good prognosis rate (GOS ≥ 4) of 65.5%, significantly better than Group A (48.6%) and Group C (53.8%) (P = 0.023). The hematoma clearance rate in Group C (89.2%) was significantly higher than in Group A (72.3%) and Group B (84.5%) (P = 0.003). Group C showed significantly higher rates of intracranial infection (18.1%) and rebleeding (19.4%) compared to Group A (5.6%, 8.3%) and Group B (11.3%, 12.7%) (P < 0.05), while Group A had the highest catheter occlusion rate (25.0%) compared to Group B (9.9%) and Group C (6.9%) (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The 12Fr drainage tube demonstrates optimal clinical balance in HVH treatment, effectively improving hematoma clearance efficiency while significantly reducing complication risks, making it the preferred option for enhancing neurological functional prognosis.
文章引用:毛丹丹, 蒋冰洁, 戚东静, 吴安, 曹爱琴, 戴夏慧. 不同管径的脑室穿刺引流管对高血压脑室出血患者预后的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(7): 263-269. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1571984

参考文献

[1] Greenberg, S.M., Ziai, W.C., Cordonnier, C., Dowlatshahi, D., Francis, B., Goldstein, J.N., et al. (2022) 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 53, e282-e361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 田和平, 王耿焕, 沈和平, 等. 改良Paine点穿刺在高血压性脑出血经翼点开颅术中治疗脑室出血的应用价值[J]. 浙江医学, 2024, 46(5): 501-505+511.
[3] Chen, C., Liu, C., Tung, Y., Lee, H., Chuang, H., Lin, S., et al. (2011) Endoscopic Surgery for Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) Caused by Thalamic Hemorrhage: Comparisons of Endoscopic Surgery and External Ventricular Drainage (EVD) Surgery. World Neurosurgery, 75, 264-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Hanley, D.F., Lane, K., McBee, N., Ziai, W., Tuhrim, S., Lees, K.R., et al. (2017) Thrombolytic Removal of Intraventricular Haemorrhage in Treatment of Severe Stroke: Results of the Randomised, Multicentre, Multiregion, Placebo-Controlled CLEAR III Trial. The Lancet, 389, 603-611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bertuccio, A., Marasco, S., Longhitano, Y., Romenskaya, T., Elia, A., Mezzini, G., et al. (2023) External Ventricular Drainage: A Practical Guide for Neuro-Anesthesiologists. Clinics and Practice, 13, 219-229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 武云珍. CVVH模式下体外循环部分的血流动力学关系理论模型推导及分析[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志(网络版), 2020, 6(4): 431-438.
[7] Ko, J.K., Cha, S.H., Choi, B.K., Lee, J.I., Yun, E.Y. and Choi, C.H. (2014) Hemorrhage Rates Associated with Two Methods of Ventriculostomy: External Ventricular Drainage vs. Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Procedure. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 54, 545-551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 谢琛璠, 曾钦霖, 林庆喜. 侧脑室外引流联合早期腰大池引流治疗脑室出血临床效果[J]. 吉林医学, 2023, 44(10): 2829-2831.
[9] Kochanek, P.M., Tasker, R.C., Carney, N., Totten, A.M., Adelson, P.D., Selden, N.R., et al. (2019) Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 20, S1-S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 朱遂强, 刘鸣, 崔丽英. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2019) [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(12): 994-1005.
[11] Haldrup, M., Rasmussen, M., Mohamad, N., Dyrskog, S., Thorup, L., Mikic, N., et al. (2023) Intraventricular Lavage vs External Ventricular Drainage for Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open, 6, e2335247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 徐宗华, 徐善水. 个体化方案治疗自发性脑室出血[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2013, 32(4): 293-295.
[13] 康新, 伏光辉. 颅脑损伤后发生进展性出血性损伤的影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2024, 19(19): 45-47.
[14] 王瑞麟, 赖长洪, 何孟泽, 等. 医用导管抗菌涂层的研究进展[J]. 表面技术, 2024, 53(16): 51-67.
[15] 赵丽, 刘俊伶, 蔡莉, 等. CT碘对比剂临床风险分层评估及干预模型的建立与应用[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2018, 35(17): 54-57.