人教版与北师大版高中生物学教材“特异性免疫”的比较分析
Comparative Analysis of “Specific Immunity” in High School Biology Textbooks: PEP Edition versus BNU Edition
摘要: 对普通高中生物学教材人教版(2019版)和北师大版(2019版)“特异性免疫”一节进行比较,发现两版教材在内容、栏目、图像和习题设置等方面各具特色。内容设置上,人教版的呈现顺序逻辑性更强,在核心概念的阐释上结合文字和图解,而北师大版则在知识面的覆盖上更广;栏目设置上,人教版聚焦学习目标且更贴近实际生活,强调整体知识框架的构建,而北师大版则更注重探究过程和实践应用;图像设置上,人教版插图直观易懂且富有趣味,而北师大版则更注重对微观的呈现,增强学习的现实感受和认知深度;习题设置上,人教版侧重基础知识和技能的训练,而北师大版侧重知识的应用,考察的内容综合性更强。
Abstract: A comparison between the 2019 People’s Education Edition (PEP Edition) and the 2019 Beijing Normal University Edition (BNU Edition) of the “Specific Immunity” section in the general high school biology textbooks reveals that each of them has their own characteristics in terms of content, columns, images and exercise settings. In terms of content, the presentation sequence of the PEP Edition is more logical, combining text and illustrations in the explanation of core concepts, while the BNU Edition covers a broader knowledge scope. In terms of column, the PEP Edition focuses on learning objectives and is closer to real life, emphasizing the construction of an overall knowledge framework, while the BNU Edition pays more attention to the exploration and practical applications. In terms of image, the illustrations in the PEP Edition are intuitive, easy to understand and interesting, while the BNU Edition pays more attention to the presentation of the microscopic level, enhancing the real feelings and cognitive depth. In terms of exercise design, the PEP Edition focuses on the basic knowledge imparting and skills training, while the BNU Edition emphasizes the application of knowledge and examines more comprehensive content.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中华人民共和国教育部. 基础教育课程改革纲要(试行) [J]. 课程教材教学研究(中教研究), 2002(Z1): 16-18.
|
|
[2]
|
Alimuddin, S. (2023) Constructivism in Education: A Comprehensive Review of Theory and Research. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5, 2652-2663.
|
|
[3]
|
谭永平. 从发展核心素养的视角探讨高中生物必修内容的变革[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2016, 36(7): 62-68.
|
|
[4]
|
钟启泉. 一纲多本: 教育民主的诉求——我国教科书政策述评[J]. 教育发展研究, 2009, 29(4): 1-6.
|
|
[5]
|
Vygotsky, L.S. (1964) Thought and Language. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 14, 97-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
高国丽. 人教版与北师大版高中生物新教材知识体系的比较研究[J]. 中学教学参考, 2018(26): 73-76.
|
|
[7]
|
奥苏伯尔. 教育心理学——认知观点[M]. 佘星南, 宋钧, 译. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1994.
|
|
[8]
|
周海旸. 例谈基于双重编码理论的微专题设计[J]. 中学生物教学, 2022(10): 44-47.
|
|
[9]
|
Bruner, J.S. (1987) Making Sense: The Child’s Construction of the World. Routledge, 81-96.
|
|
[10]
|
张菀娟, 曹利华. 情境教学理论在高中整本书阅读教学中的应用与实践——以《红楼梦》为例[J]. 中华活页文选(教师版), 2024(14): 31-33.
|
|
[11]
|
包春莹. 关于高中生物教科书图文整体设计的思考[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2017, 37(10): 110-114.
|
|
[12]
|
伍迪. 中美生物学教科书图像系统的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2019.
|
|
[13]
|
徐翠萍. 义务教育生物课程标准教材(2001版与2012版)插图对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2016.
|
|
[14]
|
Sweller, J. (2011) Cognitive Load Theory. In: Mestre, J.P. and Ross, B.H., Eds., Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education, Elsevier, 37-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
包慧宗. 试述基于核心素养的高三生物校本习题库的建设[J]. 名师在线, 2020(35): 66-67.
|
|
[16]
|
洛林·W.安德森. 布卢姆教育目标分类学修订版(完整版) [M]. 蒋小平, 张琴美, 译. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2009.
|