基于LMDI方法的企业办公领域碳达峰路径研究——以电力企业为例
Research on Carbon Peak Path in Enterprise Office Field Based on LMDI Method—A Case Study of Electric Power Enterprise
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2025.157107, PDF,   
作者: 段 春, 梁乃方:中国南方电网有限责任公司,广东 广州;李 颖:广东电网有限责任公司,广东 广州
关键词: 电网企业LMDI分解低碳办公Grid Enterprise LMDI Decomposition Method Low Carbon Office
摘要: 本研究聚焦于某电力企业行政办公领域的碳排放问题,运用对数平均除数指数(LMDI)方法,深入剖析碳排放驱动因素,并探索碳达峰路径。研究结合Kaya恒等式与LMDI分解法,针对能源碳排放系数(ΔCE)、能源结构(ΔES)、建筑面积能源强度(ΔEI)、人均建筑面积(ΔAP)及人员规模(ΔP)等因素展开分析。基于对企业办公领域碳排放现状的全面分析,本研究构建了Kaya-LMDI分解模型,并借助情景分析法对2025年至2035年的碳排放趋势进行预测。结果显示,能源结构的协同优化、能效提升以及办公规模的合理控制是实现行政办公领域碳达峰的关键举措。本研究为企业制定精准的碳减排策略提供了理论支持和实践参考。
Abstract: This study focuses on the carbon emission issue in the administrative office field of a certain power enterprise. By using the logarithmic Mean divisor Index (LMDI) method, it deeply analyzes the driving factors of carbon emissions and explores the path to carbon peaking. The study combines the Kaya identity and the LMDI decomposition method to analyze factors such as the energy carbon emission coefficient (ΔCE), energy structure (ΔES), energy intensity of building area (ΔEI), per capita building area (ΔAP), and personnel size (ΔP). Based on a comprehensive analysis of the current situation of carbon emissions in the enterprise office field, this study constructed the Kaya-LMDI decomposition model and predicted the carbon emission trend from 2025 to 2035 with the help of the scenario analysis method. The results show that the collaborative optimization of the energy structure, the improvement of energy efficiency, and the reasonable control of office scale are the key measures to achieve carbon peaking in the administrative office field. This research provides theoretical support and practical reference for enterprises to formulate precise carbon emission reduction strategies.
文章引用:段春, 梁乃方, 李颖. 基于LMDI方法的企业办公领域碳达峰路径研究——以电力企业为例[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2025, 15(7): 953-964. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2025.157107

参考文献

[1] Wang, W., Liu, X., Zhang, M. and Song, X. (2014) Using a New Generalized LMDI (Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index) Method to Analyze China’s Energy Consumption. Energy, 67, 617-622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 国家气候协同的“十四五”大气污染防治策略研究(二期)执行摘要[R]. 北京: 生态环境部环境规划院, 2021.
[3] 国务院国有资产监督管理委员会. 中央企业节约能源与生态环境保护监督管理办法[Z]. 2022-08.
[4] 蒋友娣, 张灿, 王任媛. 上海某区域既有办公建筑用能状况及碳排放计算[J]. 绿色建筑, 2021, 13(5): 37-40.
[5] 陈奕, 宋晨, 谢鹏程, 等. 绿色办公建筑碳排放分析[J]. 建设科技, 2019(Z1): 112-115.
[6] 2023中国建筑与城市基础设施碳排放研究报告[R]. 重庆: 中国建筑节能协会, 重庆大学, 2023.
[7] Wan, L., Wang, Z. and Ng, J. (2016) Measurement Research on the Decoupling Effect of Industries’ Carbon Emissions—Based on the Equipment Manufacturing Industry in China. Energies, 9, Article No. 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Hasan, M.M. and Liu, K. (2022) Decomposition Analysis of Natural Gas Consumption in Bangladesh Using an LMDI Approach. Energy Strategy Reviews, 40, Article ID: 100724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Abam, F.I., Inah, O.I. and Nwankwojike, B.N. (2024) Impact of Asset Intensity and Other Energy-Associated CO2 Emissions Drivers in the Nigerian Manufacturing Sector: A Firm-Level Decomposition (LMDI) Analysis. Heliyon, 10, e28197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ang, B.W. (2005) The LMDI Approach to Decomposition Analysis: A Practical Guide. Energy Policy, 33, 867-871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ang, B.W. and Liu, F.L. (2001) A New Energy Decomposition Method: Perfect in Decomposition and Consistent in Aggregation. Energy, 26, 537-548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Ang, B.W., Liu, F.L. and Chew, E.P. (2003) Perfect Decomposition Techniques in Energy and Environmental Analysis. Energy Policy, 31, 1561-1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Ang, B.W. (2004) Decomposition Analysis for Policymaking in Energy: Which Is the Preferred Method? Energy Policy, 32, 1131-1139.
[14] 联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC). IPCC2006年国家温室气体清单指南[Z]. 2006.
[15] 王钦章. 基于LEAP模型的安徽省建筑领域碳排放预测及技术路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽建筑大学, 2023.