非交联脱细胞基质材料生物补片对老年开放腹股沟疝手术的应用价值
The Application Value of Non-Crosslinked Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Biological Graft in the Surgical Treatment of Open Inguinal Hernia in Elderly Patients
摘要: 目的:探讨非交联脱细胞基质材料生物补片在老年开放腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2019年12月~2022年11月间于北京电力医院行开放无张力腹股沟疝修补术的79例老年患者的临床资料。根据术中使用的补片类型将患者分为试验组和对照组,对照组患者54例,术中均使用轻量大网孔补片,试验组25例,术中均使用非交联脱细胞基质材料生物补片。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后局部异物感、慢性疼痛、发热、切口感染、血清肿发生率及疝复发率等指标。结果:两组患者的一般资料如年龄、身体质量指数、手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间比较,差异不具有统计学意义;术后随访期内,两组患者均未出现复发、切口感染及慢性疼痛;试验组患者术后发热及术后1个月血清肿发生率较对照组高(P = 0.031),术后3个月两组血清肿发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:对于老年患者,非交联脱细胞基质材料生物补片的应用是安全的,术后短期出现血清肿及发热的情况是可接受的,术后需要密切随访。
Abstract: Purpose: To explore the application value of non-crosslinked decellularized extracellular matrix biological graft in open inguinal hernia repair among elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 79 elderly patients who underwent open tension-free inguinal hernia repair at Beijing Electric Power Hospital between December 2019 and November 2022. Patients were categorized into experimental and control groups based on the type of patch used during surgery. The control group (54 cases) received lightweight large-pore patches, while the experimental group (25 cases) received non-crosslinked decellularized extracellular matrix biological grafts. Surgical time, hospital stay, postoperative local foreign body sensation, chronic pain, fever, incision infection, serum swelling incidence, and hernia recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in general characteristics, including age, body mass index, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, and hospital stay, between the two groups. During the postoperative follow-up period, no cases of recurrence, incision infection, or chronic pain occurred in either group. The experimental group showed a higher incidence of postoperative fever and serum swelling at one month compared to the control group (P = 0.031). However, there was no statistically significant difference in serum swelling incidence between the two groups at three months postoperatively. Conclusion: The application of non-crosslinked decellularized extracellular matrix biological grafts in elderly patients is considered safe. Short-term occurrences of postoperative serum swelling and fever are acceptable, requiring close postoperative follow-up.
文章引用:刘立民, 赵月, 邓海, 张宗明. 非交联脱细胞基质材料生物补片对老年开放腹股沟疝手术的应用价值[J]. 外科, 2025, 14(3): 29-35. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjs.2025.143004

参考文献

[1] 李志英, 邹文贵. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前修补术与李金斯坦修补术在成人腹股沟疝治疗中的应用现状[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(6): 30-34.
[2] 孙立, 陈杰, 申英末, 储诚兵. 生物补片在腹股沟疝治疗中应用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1223-1227.
[3] 杨巍, 路遥平, 王放. 免疫衰老——人类疾病的助推器[J]. 国际老年医学杂志, 2023, 44(2): 129-134.
[4] McIntosh, A. (2000) Evidence-Based Management of Groin Hernia in Primary Care—A Systematic Review. Family Practice, 17, 442-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 周义生, 丁焱, 朱承新, 等. 杭州市萧山区成人腹股沟疝流行病学调查及对策[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 385-386.
[6] 唐健雄, 李航宇. 老年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 12-15.
[7] de Goede, B., Timmermans, L., van Kempen, B.J.H., van Rooij, F.J.A., Kazemier, G., Lange, J.F., et al. (2015) Risk Factors for Inguinal Hernia in Middle-Aged and Elderly Men: Results from the Rotterdam Study. Surgery, 157, 540-546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Berndsen, M.R., Guðbjartsson, T. and Berndsen, F.H. (2019) Nárakviðslit-Yfirlitsgrein. Læknablaðið, 2019, 385-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Perez, A.J. and Campbell, S. (2022) Inguinal Hernia Repair in Older Persons. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 23, 563-567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 杨俊光, 陈明. 老年腹股沟疝的外科治疗进展[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(13): 194-198.
[11] Ran, K., Wang, X. and Zhao, Y. (2020) Open Tensionless Repair Techniques for Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Hernia, 24, 733-745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 姜峰, 台德军, 蔡绍海. 老年腹股沟疝患者行疝修补术后并发症的多因素Logistic回归分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 467-471.
[13] Li, B., Zhang, X., Man, Y., Xie, J., Hu, W., Huang, H., et al. (2021) Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repairs with Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa: A 5-Year Follow-Up. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Regenerative Biomaterials, 8, rbaa055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Sun, L., Chen, J. and Shen, Y. (2019) Randomized Controlled Trial of Lichtenstein Repair of Indirect Inguinal Hernias with Two Biologic Meshes from Porcine Small Intestine Submucos. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 15, 1277-1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Fang, Z., Ren, F., Zhou, J. and Tian, J. (2015) Biologic Mesh versus Synthetic Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: System Review and Meta-Analysis. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 85, 910-916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 杨建军, 李绍春, 李绍杰, 等. 生物材料补片和合成材料补片对老年腹股沟疝修补术后患者血清肿发生率的影响比较[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2022, 28(4): 887-891.
[17] 王平. 腹腔镜腹部疝修补术后血清肿分型的解读[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(2): 107-108.
[18] 黄亮, 余壮明, 李军, 等. 自固定聚丙烯/聚乳酸复合补片改善腹股沟疝无张力修补后的慢性疼痛[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(6): 908-913.
[19] 余成建, 冯樱. 腹股沟疝Lichtenstein无张力修补术后慢性疼痛的影响因素分析及预测模型建立[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2021, 30(8): 713-718.
[20] 陈志山, 洪黎清, 杨昌毅, 等. 手术方式及补片材质对腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛的影响[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2018, 45(17): 86-88.
[21] 李卫兵, 黄博. 生物补片在腹外疝修补中的应用进展[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2016, 23(2): 165-167.
[22] Magnusson, J., Nygren, J., Gustafsson, U.O. and Thorell, A. (2016) Ultrapro Hernia System, Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair: 3-Year Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Hernia, 20, 641-648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]