基于DeepSeek和DeepLearning融合策略的工程保障实体关系抽取
Engineering Support Entity Relation Extraction Based on DeepSeek and DeepLearning Fusion Strategy
DOI: 10.12677/hjdm.2025.153020, PDF,   
作者: 周 超, 屠义强, 余若涵, 杨 兵, 杨园园:陆军工程大学野战工程学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 工程保障关系抽取DeepSeekEngineering Support Relation Extraction DeepSeek
摘要: 工程保障实体关系抽取对于开展智能化辅助决策具有重要意义。本文在领域专家的指导下设计了工程保障实体关系,并本地化部署DeepSeek,经过TCL、CoT多轮Prompt学习,抽取了工程保障实体关系;对该领域的数据集进行人工标注,开展基于四种模型的关系抽取实验,结果表明,RoBERTa-BiGRU-ATT模型的实体关系抽取效果最好,精确率、召回率和F1值分别达到了0.8903、0.8879、0.8885。本文研究表明,基于DeepSeek和DeepLearning融合策略对抽取实体关系,是一种更高效便捷的方法,对于构建领域知识图谱和智能问答具有重要意义。
Abstract: Engineering support entity relation extraction is of great significance for intelligent assistant decision-making. In this paper, under the guidance of domain experts, the engineering support entity relationship is designed, and DeepSeek is deployed locally. After TCL and CoT rounds of Prompt learning, the engineering support entity relationship is extracted. The data sets in this field are manually labeled, and relationship extraction experiments based on four models are carried out. The results show that the RoBERTa-BiGRU-ATT model has the best entity relationship extraction effect, and the accuracy rate, recall rate and F1 value are 0.8903,0.8879 and 0.8885, respectively. The research in this paper shows that the fusion strategy based on DeepSeek and DeepLearning is a more efficient and convenient method for extracting entity relationships, which is of great significance for constructing domain knowledge graphs and intelligent question answering.
文章引用:周超, 屠义强, 余若涵, 杨兵, 杨园园. 基于DeepSeek和DeepLearning融合策略的工程保障实体关系抽取[J]. 数据挖掘, 2025, 15(3): 242-253. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjdm.2025.153020

参考文献

[1] Gan, L.X., Wan, C.X., et al. (2016) Chinese Named Entity Relation Extraction Based on the Syntactic and Semantic. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 53, 284-302.
[2] 金轴, 李成军, 刘旭波. 基于深度学习的军事领域实体关系抽取研究[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2022, 38(5): 32-36.
[3] 姚洁仪. 基于深度学习的医疗实体关系抽取研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 宜昌: 三峡大学, 2024.
[4] 周兰强, 李宇, 华远鹏, 等. 基于BERT-graph-Global Pointer的油气知识图谱实体关系抽取[J]. 电子元器件与信息技术, 2024, 8(9): 63-68.
[5] 张劲松. 基于bert的中文电子病历实体关系抽取方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2024.
[6] 王彤, 张立杰, 王铭, 等. 融合RoBERTa-WWM和全局指针网络的农业病害实体关系联合抽取研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2024, 47(3): 113-120+129.
[7] 朱珊珊, 唐慧丰. 基于BiLSTMAtt的军事领域实体关系抽取研究[J]. 智能计算机与应用, 2019, 9(4): 96-99.
[8] 蒋怡宁. 基于预训练模型的军事文本关系抽取方法及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2022.
[9] 王学锋, 杨若鹏, 贾明亮. 基于循环神经网络的作战文书实体关系抽取[J]. 智能安全, 2022, 1(1): 29-35.
[10] 夏江镧, 李艳玲, 葛凤培. 基于大语言模型的实体关系抽取综述[J/OL]. 计算机科学与探索, 1-23.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5602.TP.20250219.1506.010.html, 2025-07-02.
[11] 汤少梁, 赵楠, 龙秋予, 等. 基于ChatGLM的中医妇科知识图谱自动化构建与临床决策支持研究[J/OL]. 中华中医药学刊, 1-22.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1546.R.20250311.2049.026.html, 2025-07-02.
[12] Brown, T.B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., et al. (2020) Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners.
[13] Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., et al. (2022) Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, New Orleans, 28 November-9 December 2022, 24824-24837.
[14] Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., et al. (2019) RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach.