煤中CO2吸附相密度不同获取方法对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Different Methods for Obtaining CO2 Adsorption Phase Density in Coal
DOI: 10.12677/me.2025.134074, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 谢俊超*, 刘会虎#, 徐宏杰:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南;丁 海, 方惠京:安徽省煤田地质局勘查研究院,安徽 合肥
关键词: CO2吸附相密度等温吸附实验吸附模型拟合截距法CO2 Adsorption Phase Density Isothermal Adsorption Experiment Adsorption Model Fitting Intercept Method
摘要: 碳捕集、利用与封存(CCUS)技术中,明确煤中CO2吸附相密度对掌握煤层中CO2吸附机理和评估封存潜力至关重要。本研究选取淮北矿区祁东矿气煤煤样,依据相关标准开展不同温度(36℃、42℃、48℃)下的高压等温吸附实验。采用吸附模型拟合法(优化后的Langmuir、BET、DA模型)和截距法对实验数据进行处理,对比分析两种方法获取的CO2吸附相密度。结果表明,吸附模型拟合法中Langmuir和DA模型对煤样48℃下CO2吸附过程拟合效果良好,校正后的Langmuir模型拟合得到的CO2吸附相密度为1.16 g/ml,DA模型为1.07 g/ml,BET模型不适用;截距法得到的CO2吸附相密度随温度升高从36℃的2.22 g/ml下降到48℃的1.19 g/ml。两种方法各有优劣,吸附模型拟合法利于深入研究吸附机理,截距法能快速获取数据和反映变化趋势,实际应用中应按需选择。本研究为获取煤中CO2吸附相密度提供了方法参考,对CCUS技术在煤层封存领域的发展具有重要意义。
Abstract: In carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology, it is crucial to understand the density of CO2 adsorption phases in coal to grasp the mechanism of CO2 adsorption in coal seams and evaluate the potential for storage. This study selected gas-coal samples from Qidong Mine in the Huabei mining area and conducted high-pressure isothermal adsorption experiments at different temperatures (36˚C, 42˚C, 48˚C) according to relevant standards. The experimental data were processed using the adsorption model fitting method (optimized Langmuir, BET, and DA models) and the intercept method, and the CO2 adsorption phase densities obtained by both methods were compared. The results showed that the Langmuir and DA models performed well in fitting the CO2 adsorption process at 48˚C for the coal sample. The corrected Langmuir model yielded a CO2 adsorption phase density of 1.16 g/ml, while the DA model gave 1.07 g/ml; the BET model was not applicable. The intercept method resulted in a CO2 adsorption phase density that decreased from 2.22 g/ml at 36˚C to 1.19 g/ml at 48˚C. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages; the adsorption model fitting method facilitates in-depth research on adsorption mechanisms, while the intercept method can quickly obtain data and reflect trends. In practical applications, the choice should be made based on specific needs. This study provides a methodological reference for obtaining CO2 adsorption phase densities in coal and is of significant importance for the development of CCUS technology in coal seam storage.
文章引用:谢俊超, 刘会虎, 丁海, 徐宏杰, 方惠京. 煤中CO2吸附相密度不同获取方法对比分析[J]. 矿山工程, 2025, 13(4): 659-665. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2025.134074

参考文献

[1] 桑树勋, 袁亮, 刘世奇, 等. 碳中和地质技术及其煤炭低碳化应用前瞻[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(4): 1430-1451.
[2] 侯瑞云. 煤储层的孔隙度、相对渗透率特征及其测定方法[J]. 石油实验地质,1996, 18(3): 331-335.
[3] 盛茂, 李根生, 陈立强, 等. 页岩气超临界吸附机理分析及等温吸附模型的建立[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014, 39(S1): 179-183.
[4] 赵龙, 秦勇, 杨兆彪, 等. 煤中超临界甲烷等温吸附模型研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(5): 753-760.
[5] 杨靖浩, 刘会虎, 张琨, 等. 低渗煤中N2吸附模型适用性分析[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2023, 35(9): 27-32.
[6] 刘会虎, 范正谱, 徐宏杰, 等. 煤层甲烷吸附相密度、吸附模型、吸附机理的再认识[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(10): 3806-3817.
[7] 杨琴, 黄亮, 周文, 等. 深层页岩伊利石孔隙中甲烷吸附相密度特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(5): 799-807.
[8] 张明杰, 刘浩, 贾天让, 等. 颗粒煤超临界态甲烷吸附相密度特征研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(5): 105-113.
[9] 朱宇, 陆小华, 丁皓, 等. 分子模拟在化工应用中的若干问题及思考[J]. 化工学报, 2004, 55(8): 1213-1223.
[10] 刘欣, 顾宜. 高分子科学中的计算机模拟[J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2000, 16(6): 28-31.
[11] 王帅峰, 韩思杰, 桑树勋, 等. 煤层亚临界/超临界CO2吸附特征与封存模式[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(6): 152-168.
[12] 曾泉树, 高清春, 汪志明. 煤岩吸附高压甲烷的实验与模型研究[J]. 石油科学通报, 2020, 5(1): 78-92.
[13] Namdeo, S., Srivastava, V.C. and Mohanty, P. (2023) Machine Learning Implemented Exploration of the Adsorption Mechanism of Carbon Dioxide onto Porous Carbons. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 647, 129-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]