铁路内燃机车故障维修知识图谱与决策推荐
Knowledge Graph and Decision Recommendation for Diesel Locomotive Fault Maintenance in Railway Systems
摘要: 针对铁路内燃机车维修领域数据分散、信息孤岛等痛点,文章提出了一种基于知识图谱构建与推理的智能辅助决策方法。首先,采用自顶向下策略,结合现场维修案例,通过自定义词典和正则规则抽取设备型号、故障部位;针对故障原因、现象和维修措施等语义复杂要素,引入BERT-CRF模型进行抽取,模型在构建的铁路故障语料库上实现了90.18%的Precision、90.91%的Recall与89.92%的F1值。将生成三元组数据由Neo4j图数据库存储。最后,基于TransE、TransH、TransR和TransD四种嵌入算法开展链接预测对比,TransE在MRR (0.880)、Hits@10 (0.944)等指标上表现最佳,选其作为推理核心。该方法能够有效整合维修数据,提升维修决策的准确性与效率。
Abstract: In response to the challenges of fragmented data and information silos in the maintenance domain of railway diesel locomotives, this paper proposes an intelligent decision-support approach based on knowledge graph construction and reasoning. First, a top-down strategy is employed, integrating on-site maintenance case studies to extract equipment models and fault locations using a custom dictionary and regular expression rules. For semantically complex elements such as fault causes, fault phenomena, and maintenance measures, a BERT-CRF model is introduced for sequence labeling, achieving a precision of 90.18%, a recall of 90.91%, and an F1 score of 89.92% on the constructed railway fault corpus. The resulting triplet data are stored in the Neo4j graph database. Finally, a comparative link prediction analysis is conducted using four embedding algorithms—TransE, TransH, TransR, and TransD—with TransE demonstrating superior performance in metrics such as MRR (0.880) and Hits@10 (0.944), and is thus chosen as the core inference model. This approach effectively integrates dispersed maintenance data, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of decision-making and showing promising potential for practical application.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Rosyiq, A., Hayah, A.R., Hidayanto, A.N., Naisuty, M., Suhanto, A. and Avuning Budi, N.F. (2019) Information Extraction from Twitter Using Dbpedia Ontology: Indonesia Tourism Places. 2019 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS), Jakarta, 24-25 October 2019, 91-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Pellissier Tanon, T., Weikum, G. and Suchanek, F. (2020) YAGO 4: A Reason-Able Knowledge Base. In: Harth, A., et al., Eds., The Semantic Web, Springer, 583-596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
吴涛. 基于知识图谱的肝脏疾病问答系统的研究与实现[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 中北大学, 2023.
|
|
[4]
|
李伟光. 基于知识图谱的理财基金问答系统的研究与应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2024.
|
|
[5]
|
耿念. 煤矿核心灾害知识图谱构建及问答研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2024.
|
|
[6]
|
姚剑. 铁路客站设备健康管理与智能管控关键技术研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国铁道科学研究院, 2023.
|
|
[7]
|
吕志凡. 面向高铁车载设备故障诊断的知识图谱构建及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2024.
|
|
[8]
|
孙建强, 许少华. 基于可微神经计算机和贝叶斯网络的知识推理方法[J]. 计算机应用, 2021, 41(2): 337-342.
|
|
[9]
|
Bordes, A., Nicolas, U., Alberto, G.D., et al. (2013) Translating Embeddings for Modeling Multi-Relational Data. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, 5-10 December 2013, 2787-2895.
|
|
[10]
|
孟小艳, 蒋同海, 周喜, 等. 一种改进的自适应知识图谱嵌入式表示方法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2021, 38(1): 39-43.
|