从存理去欲看王阳明生态思想
Wang Yangming’s Ecological Thought from the Perspective of Keeping Reason and Removing Desire
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.147335, PDF,   
作者: 张玉琴, 孙君恒:武汉科技大学马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 王阳明存理去欲万物一体生态伦理Wang Yangming Reasoning and Desires Oneness of all Things Eco-Ethics
摘要: 王阳明在其心学体系中建构了独特的伦理范式,将天理确立为道德形上学的终极依据,同时对人类感性欲求的合理性进行解构。这一思想集中体现于“存理去欲”的伦理实践命题,通过强调道德本体对经验性欲望的超越性统摄,天理不仅是宇宙自然法则的体现,也是人类行为的最高准则,具体表现为存中去偏、存公去私、存明去蔽、存善去恶四个方面。在王阳明看来,人与自然应处于一种和谐共生的关系之中,这种关系不仅是一种生存的需要,更是一种道德上的追求。与此同时,阳明在建构心性论体系时,从本体论维度阐释了主体与自然客体、经验欲望与道德本体之间的辩证统一关系。其思想不仅揭示出存在论意义上的“万物一体”整体性结构,更通过“天人同构”的理论范式,将人欲纳入天理的形上本体之中进行统合。王阳明的生态伦理思想提供了一个既实际又理想的生态伦理框架,通过个人修养与社会制度的改进,实现人与自然的和谐共生。
Abstract: Wang Yangming constructed a unique ethical paradigm in his system of teleology, establishing the Divine Principle as the ultimate basis for moral metaphysics while deconstructing the rationality of human sensual desires. This idea is concentrated in the ethical practice proposition of “keeping the reason and removing the desire”, which emphasizes the transcendental domination of the moral essence over the empirical desires, and that the Divine Principle is not only the embodiment of the natural laws of the universe, but also the supreme criterion of human behavior, which is specifically expressed in the four aspects of keeping the middle and removing the bias, keeping the public and removing the private, keeping the clear and removing the obscurity, and keeping the good and removing the evil. In Wang Yangming’s view, man and nature should be in a harmonious and symbiotic relationship, which is not only a need for survival, but also a moral pursuit. At the same time, when constructing the system of the theory of mind, Yangming explained the dialectical and unifying relationship between the subject and the natural object, as well as between empirical desire and moral essence from the ontological dimension. His thought not only reveals the holistic structure of “the oneness of all things” in the existential sense, but also integrates human desires into the formal ontology of the Divine Principle through the theoretical paradigm of “heaven and man are one and the same”. Wang Yangming’s eco-ethical thinking provides a practical and ideal eco-ethical framework to realize the harmonious coexistence of human beings and nature through personal cultivation and improvement of the social system.
文章引用:张玉琴, 孙君恒. 从存理去欲看王阳明生态思想[J]. 哲学进展, 2025, 14(7): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2025.147335

参考文献

[1] 王守仁. 王阳明全集[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1992.
[2] 秦蓁. 生态共同体: 王阳明“天地万物一体”再诠释[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(6): 110-116.
[3] 蒙培元. 关于中国哲学生态观的几个问题[J]. 中国哲学史, 2003(4): 5-11.
[4] 陈长生. 王阳明的生态伦理思想及其现实价值[J]. 广东教育学院学报, 2010, 30(1): 75-81.
[5] 张祥浩. 王守仁评传[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2011: 25-26.
[6] 孙君恒, 张玉琴. 王阳明知行合一的实证[J]. 黄河科技学院学报, 2023, 25(9): 75-81.
[7] Zhang, X.H. and Wang, Y. (2013) Essentials of the Construction of an Ecological Civilization. Social Sciences in China, 34, 180-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 程志华. 功夫只在自己——王阳明“致良知”的功夫论解读[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2024(4): 5-15.
[9] 张斯珉. 良知贯通于自然——论王阳明“良知”说的自然维度和生态价值[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2018(9): 104-112.
[10] 强昱. 有无之境: 王阳明哲学的精神[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006: 52-53.
[11] 梁花. 王阳明德育思想及其现代意义[D]: [博士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2014.
[12] 张锦枝. 论王阳明思想中的物与知[J]. 哲学动态, 2023(9): 57-66.
[13] 陈长生. 王阳明生态伦理思想研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 苏州: 苏州科技学院, 2010.
[14] 常新. 阳明心学: 助力构建当代中国伦理精神[N]. 社会科学报, 2024-05-16(05).
[15] 邓名瑛. 论生态良知[J]. 伦理学研究, 2003(2): 86-89.
[16] 王颢. 论王阳明“致良知”及其价值[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2007.
[17] 刘婷坤. 从致良知到生态良知[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2014.
[18] 杜维明, 蒙培元, 郑家栋, 李存山, 卢风, 雷毅. 儒家与生态[J]. 中国哲学史, 2003(1): 5-18.
[19] 何静. 论王阳明心学对道教的融合[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2006(1): 94-97+143.
[20] 赵宁, 薛勇民. 王阳明“万物一体”论的生态哲学意蕴[J]. 史志学刊, 2015(4): 68-73.
[21] Kirkland, R. (1992) Person and Culture in the Taoist Tradition. Journal of Chinese Religions, 20, 77-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef