哈贝马斯交往理论与马克思交往理论之间的承续及异同
The Continuation, Differences and Similarities between Habermas’ Communication Theory and Marx’ Communication Theory
摘要: 交往是人与人之间发生社会关系的一种中介,是当代人类生存的一大实践问题,是人类特有的活动方式。但在特定的历史条件下,交往发生了扭曲和变形,人与人之间的关系被物化和工具化,正是交往异化的出现使交往问题成为这个时代研究的重点,愈来愈引起社会科学界的重视。研究“交往”思想对理解人与人之间的关系具有重要意义。本文旨在揭示马克思与哈贝马斯交往理论之间的关联,分析两者之间的异同,以此丰富对交往理论的理解,推动交往理论的进一步发展。
Abstract: Communication acts as a medium for the formation of social relations among individuals, representing a significant practical issue in contemporary human existence and a unique mode of activity peculiar to humanity. However, under specific historical conditions, communication has undergone distortion and deformation, with human relationships being reified and instrumentalized. It is precisely the emergence of communicative alienation that has made the issue of communication a research focus of our era, increasingly attracting the attention of the social science community. Studying the concept of “communication” is of great significance for understanding human relationships. This paper aims to reveal the connections between Marx’s and Habermas’ theories of communication, analyze their similarities and differences, so as to enrich the understanding of communication theory and promote its further development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王婷婷, 张博. 哈贝马斯与马克思交往理论之比较研究[J]. 淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 12(4): 20-23.
|
|
[2]
|
哈贝马斯, 著. 重建历史唯物主义[M]. 郭官义, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2000: 45.
|
|
[3]
|
《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 275.
|
|
[4]
|
韩红. 交往的合理化与现代性的重建——哈贝马斯交往行动理论的深层解读[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2005: 45.
|
|
[5]
|
范宝舟. 论马克思交往理论及其当代意义[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2005: 121, 228.
|
|
[6]
|
《马克思恩格斯选集》第4卷[M]. 北京: 北京人民出版社, 1995: 321-322.
|
|
[7]
|
贾敏. 马克思与哈贝马斯交往理论的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2013.
|