跟踪纠缠行为的犯罪化研究
A Study on the Criminalisation of Stalking and Pestering Behaviour
摘要: 跟踪纠缠行为不仅侵犯了公众个人的安宁居住权,还可能影响公众的心理健康和生活自由,从而对社会秩序造成潜在威胁。考虑到我国的法律环境和社会实际,提出通过修正案的形式在刑法中增设专门条款,明确跟踪纠缠行为的定义、处罚方式及量刑标准。同时尝试将典型的跟踪纠缠行为在《治安管理处罚法》中单独规定相应的行政处罚,通过此路径推进跟踪纠缠行为犯罪化。通过“无视他人的意愿”“反复且持续地采取一系列行为”与“足以对他人造成心理负担或危害其生活安宁”三个构成要件限缩跟踪纠缠行为的成罪空间,以期为我国对该行为的立法和社会治理提供参考。
Abstract: Stalking and pestering behaviour not only violates the public’s individual right to peaceful residence, but also may affect the public’s mental health and freedom of life, thus posing a potential threat to the social order. Considering the legal environment and social reality in China, it is proposed to add special provisions to the criminal law by way of amendment to clarify the definition, punishment and sentencing standards of stalking and pestering behaviours. At the same time, it is also proposed that typical stalking behaviours should be subject to separate administrative penalties in the “Public Security Administration Punishment Law”, so as to criminalise stalking behaviours. Through the three constitutive elements of “disregarding the will of others”, “repeatedly and persistently adopting a series of behaviours” and “sufficiently causing psychological burden to others or endangering their peace of mind”, the stalking and pestering behaviours are limited to the scope of criminalisation. The three constitutive elements of stalking and pestering limit the criminal space of stalking and pestering behaviour, with a view to providing reference for the legislation and social governance of this behaviour in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Spitzberg, B.H. and Cupach, W.R. (2007) The State of the Art of Stalking: Taking Stock of the Emerging Literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
赵雪洽, 焦宝乾. 跟踪纠缠行为的刑法规制: 释义、根据与进路[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 39(2): 108-117.
|
|
[3]
|
牛天宝. 跟踪纠缠行为犯罪化研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2020.
|
|
[4]
|
Tjaden, P.G. (2009) Stalking Policies and Research in the United States: A Twenty Year Retrospective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 261-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
van der Aa, S. (2017) New Trends in the Criminalization of Stalking in the EU Member States. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24, 315-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
隗佳. 德国刑法对妇女的保护研究——以《德国刑法典》第238条纠缠骚扰罪为视角[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2018(3): 46-53, 94.
|
|
[7]
|
欧盟法规库. 欧洲委员会《防止和打击暴力侵害妇女行为和家庭暴力公约》[EB/OL]. https://tbt.sist.org.cn/cslm/omfgk3/202306/t20230616_2477485.html, 2024-02-29.
|
|
[8]
|
郑琳, 晋涛. 日本对“跟踪纠缠”行为的处罚及启示[J]. 日本问题研究, 2021, 35(5): 72-80.
|
|
[9]
|
卢建平. 软暴力犯罪的现象、特征与惩治对策[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2018(3): 86-99.
|
|
[10]
|
张明楷. 刑法学(上) [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 682.
|
|
[11]
|
王皇玉. 跟踪纠缠行为犯罪化之趋势[J]. 刑事政策与犯罪研究论文集, 2019(22): 307-309.
|
|
[12]
|
参见中国裁判文书网[EB/OL]. https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/website/wenshu/181029CR4M5A62CH/index.html, 2024-02-29.
|
|
[13]
|
卢建平, 皮婧靖. 中国刑法犯罪化与非犯罪化的述评与展望——以犯罪化与非犯罪化的概念解构为切入点[J]. 政治与法律, 2020(7): 2-17.
|
|
[14]
|
王利明. 生活安宁权: 一种特殊的隐私权[J]. 中州学刊, 2019(7): 46-55.
|
|
[15]
|
Morris, M.C., Bailey, B. and Ruiz, E. (2019) Pain in the Acute Aftermath of Stalking: Associations with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Depressive Symptoms, and Posttraumatic Cognitions. Violence Against Women, 26, 1343-1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[16]
|
张明楷. 刑法格言的展开[M]. 北京: 北京法律出版社, 2013: 166.
|