个人医疗信息知情同意原则的困境与对策
Dilemmas and Countermeasures Regarding the Principle of Informed Consent for Personal Medical Information
摘要: 随着大数据技术在医疗卫生领域的应用,传统的知情同意原则面临着来自技术革新与制度调整等方面的多重挑战与考验。我国现行法律体系中,对于个人医疗信息的分类尚缺乏细致划分,普遍采取了一种全面而严格的同意机制。尽管这种“特别同意”模式旨在为个人医疗信息安全设置最高级别的防护,但实际上,因其设定了较为严苛的信息采集与处理标准,不经意间导致信息主体与信息处理机构之间的关系趋于紧张。这种状况揭示了在执行知情同意原则过程中遇到的诸多难题,使得在大数据时代下知情同意原则面临形式化、成本增加、有效性降低等多种问题,以至于学界出现了抛弃知情同意原则的论调。笔者认为,无论什么时代下,个人自主决定权体现了人之为人的自主意志,绝不应该被抛弃。通过直面问题,重构知情同意原则才是唯一可行的路径。将信息主体从被动、消极的被保护者转为信息处理的参与者,加入分级同意模式、信息处置者的持续披露和告知义务来完善和延续知情同意模式是大数据时代下的方式之一。
Abstract: With the application of big data technology in the healthcare sector, the traditional principle of informed consent faces multiple challenges arising from technological innovation and institutional adjustments. Within China’s current legal framework, the classification of personal medical information lacks granularity, and a comprehensive yet stringent consent mechanism is widely adopted. Although this “specific consent” model aims to provide the highest level of protection for personal medical information security, it inadvertently creates tension between data subjects and information handlers by imposing stringent standards for data collection and processing. This situation reveals numerous difficulties in implementing the informed consent principle, leading to issues such as formalism, increased costs, and reduced effectiveness in the big data era. Consequently, some academic circles have advocated abandoning the informed consent principle. The author argues that the right to personal autonomy—reflecting the essence of human self-determination—must never be discarded, regardless of the era. The only viable path forward is to confront these challenges and reconstruct the informed consent principle. Transforming data subjects from passive, protected entities into active participants in information processing, alongside adopting tiered consent models and imposing ongoing disclosure and notification obligations on information handlers, represents one way to refine and sustain the informed consent framework in the age of big data.
文章引用:曾家豪. 个人医疗信息知情同意原则的困境与对策[J]. 争议解决, 2025, 11(7): 150-158. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.117226

参考文献

[1] 蒋言斌, 蒋晓洁. 医疗大数据中患者隐私权分类层级化及保护研究[J]. 锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 19(4): 11-14.
[2] 韩旭至. 敏感个人信息的界定及其处理前提——以《个人信息保护法》第28条为中心[J]. 求是学刊, 2022, 49(5): 132-145.
[3] 高露梅. 多主体利益视角下健康医疗数据利用及保护的法制优化[J]. 医学与法学, 2020, 12(6): 53-58.
[4] Petrini, C. (2010) “Broad” Consent, Exceptions to Consent and the Question of Using Biological Samples for Research Purposes Different from the Initial Collection Purpose. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 217-220.
[5] 田野. 大数据时代知情同意原则的困境与出路——以生物资料库的个人信息保护为例[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2018, 24(6): 111-136.
[6] 彭诚信. 论个人信息的双重法律属性[J]. 清华法学, 2021, 15(6): 78-97.
[7] 王欢, 李雅琴. 个人医疗数据利用中知情同意的伦理探讨[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2021, 34(7): 830-834+843.
[8] 谢安. 大数据时代政府数据的开放[J]. 开放导报, 2016(3): 53-57.
[9] 刘月树. 知情同意原则的起源与发展[J]. 医学与哲学(A), 2012, 33(5): 17-19.
[10] 张文显. 法理: 法理学的中心主题和法学的共同关注[J]. 清华法学, 2017, 11(4): 5-40.
[11] [德]黑格尔. 法哲学原理[M]. 范扬, 张企泰, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013.
[12] 陈强. 权利个人主义与道德个人主义辨析——兼论当代中国的个人主义现状和趋势[J]. 道德与文明, 2014(5): 34-40.
[13] 吴泓. 信赖理念下的个人信息使用与保护[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2018, 21(1): 22-36.
[14] 任龙龙. 论同意不是个人信息处理的正当性基础[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(1): 126-134.
[15] 张新宝. 个人信息收集: 告知同意原则适用的限制[J]. 比较法研究, 2019(6): 1-20.
[16] 梁泽宇. 个人信息保护中目的限制原则的解释与适用[J]. 比较法研究, 2018(5): 16-30.