LZ煤矿安全生产影响因素研究
Research on Influencing Factors of LZ Coal Mine Safety Production
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2025.157191, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 邹丽娟*:河北工程大学管理工程与商学院,河北 邯郸;梁 田, 龚 峰, 孙鹏飞#:河北工程大学地球科学与工程学院,河北 邯郸
关键词: 煤矿安全层次分析法(AHP)蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS)权重分析耦合模型Coal Mine Safety Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) Weight Analysis Coupling Model
摘要: 本文针对煤矿安全生产影响因素的复杂性与不确定性,综合运用层次分析法(AHP)与蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS),构建了多层级风险评估模型。通过AHP将影响因素划分为人、设备、环境、管理四大准则层(涵盖26项具体指标),量化各因素权重并揭示人因主导性(权重35%~45%)的显著特征;进一步利用MCS模拟判断矩阵的随机扰动,生成权重分布区间与置信度分析,解决了传统AHP依赖专家经验的主观偏差问题。研究表明,AHP-MCS耦合方法能够动态评估风险演化路径(如瓦斯浓度波动、设备老化风险),并通过敏感性分析识别关键管控节点,为煤矿安全治理提供科学依据。
Abstract: This study addresses the complexity and uncertainty of coal mine safety production factors by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to construct a multi-level risk assessment model. Through AHP, influencing factors are categorized into four major criteria layers—human, equipment, environment, and management, comprising 26 specific indicators. Quantitative analysis reveals the dominance of human factors (weights 35%~45%). MCS is further employed to simulate random perturbations in judgment matrices, generating weight distribution intervals and confidence level analysis, thereby addressing the subjective bias inherent in traditional AHP that relies on expert judgment. The research demonstrates that the AHP-MCS coupling method enables dynamic assessment of risk evolution paths (e.g., gas concentration fluctuations, equipment aging risks) and identifies critical control nodes through sensitivity analysis, providing a scientific basis for coal mine safety governance.
文章引用:邹丽娟, 梁田, 龚峰, 孙鹏飞. LZ煤矿安全生产影响因素研究[J]. 现代管理, 2025, 15(7): 94-100. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2025.157191

参考文献

[1] 王未来, 张文清. 煤矿安全管理制度有效性评价指标体系构建[J]. 煤炭技术, 2025, 44(2): 264-267.
[2] 潘理虎, 杨明, 陈志强. 我国煤矿安全领域研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(3): 56-65.
[3] Saaty, T.L. (2008) Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 83-98.
[4] Mu, D.D., Liu, G. and Chen, W. (2015) Assessment Index System of Coal Mine Safety Based on AHP-MCS. Safety Science, 72, 89-93.
[5] Li, J., Wang, X. and Zhang, T. (2023) Comprehensive Evaluation of Mine Safety Based on Improved Game Theory and AHP. Resources Policy, 85, Article 103676.
[6] 荆全忠, 杨洪涛, 郝贵. 基于层次分析法的煤矿安全生产能力指标体系研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2006, 38(12): 95-97.
[7] 高西林, 程志勇, 金建春. 基于AHP和AMM的煤矿安全风险评价研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2014, 46(12): 108-110.
[8] 张婷婷, 王建国, 刘洋. 基于AHP-SPA的煤矿安全管理模型构建及应用[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2019, 46(4): 34-39.
[9] 栗婧, 李伟, 赵玉灵. 基于蒙特卡罗方法的煤矿爆破作业风险评估[J]. 煤炭学报, 2024, 49(2): 45-54.
[10] 吕跃进, 张维, 唐炎. 指数标度判断矩阵的一致性检验方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2006, 26(3): 78-85.