基于区间值毕达哥拉斯Sugeno-Weber Softmax算子的WASPAS多属性决策方法
WASPAS Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method Based on Interval Valued Pythagorean Sugeno-Weber Softmax Operator
摘要: 针对属性值为区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊数且权重信息完全未知的决策问题,本文提出基于Sugeno-Weber Softmax算子的区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊多属性决策方法。首先,定义了基于Sugeno-Weber三角模的区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊数运算法则。其次,为考虑属性间的优先关系,提出四种区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊Sugeno-Weber Softmax平均和几何集成算子并讨论所提算子的幂等性、有界性和单调性等性质。为确定属性的权重信息,提出基于区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊PSI (Preference Selection Index)方法确定属性的客观权重。进一步提出基于Sugeno-Weber Softmax算子的区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment)方法确定备选方案的排序。通过实际案例验证所提方法的有效性及合理性,并由比较分析和参数分析讨论所提方法的鲁棒性和优越性。
Abstract: This paper addresses decision-making problems characterized by attribute values expressed as interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (IVPFNs) and completely unknown weight information. We propose a novel interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methodology based on the Sugeno-Weber Softmax operator. Firstly, arithmetic operations for IVPFNs are defined utilizing the Sugeno-Weber t-norm and t-conorm. Secondly, to account for priority relationships among attributes, four Pythagorean fuzzy Sugeno-Weber Softmax averaging and geometric aggregation operators are introduced. Fundamental properties of these operators, including idempotency, boundedness, and monotonicity, are rigorously investigated. To resolve the unknown weight issue, an objective weight determination method for attributes is developed using the Pythagorean fuzzy Preference Selection Index approach. Furthermore, an enhanced Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method, integrated with the proposed Sugeno-Weber Softmax operators, is presented to determine the ranking of alternatives. The effectiveness and rationality of the proposed methodology are validated through an empirical case study. Comparative analysis and parameter sensitivity analysis further demonstrate its superior robustness and performance over existing methods.
文章引用:万国柔. 基于区间值毕达哥拉斯Sugeno-Weber Softmax算子的WASPAS多属性决策方法[J]. 应用数学进展, 2025, 14(7): 174-188. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2025.147355

参考文献

[1] Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Atanassov, K.T. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Yager, R.R. and Abbasov, A.M. (2013) Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28, 436-452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yager, R.R. (2014) Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22, 958-965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Cui, Y., Liu, W., Rani, P. and Alrasheedi, M. (2021) Internet of Things (IoT) Adoption Barriers for the Circular Economy Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Swara-CoCoSo Decision-Making Approach in the Manufacturing Sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, Article 120951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Thi Minh Hang, N., Nguyen, V.P. and Nguyen, D.T. (2022) A New Hybrid Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and COCOSO MCDM Based Approach by Adopting Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 36, 1279-1305.
[7] Ayyildiz, E., Erdogan, M. and Gul, M. (2024) A Comprehensive Risk Assessment Framework for Occupational Health and Safety in Pharmaceutical Warehouses Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Bayesian Networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 135, Article 108763 [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Wang, H., Zhang, F. and Ullah, K. (2022) Waste Clothing Recycling Channel Selection Using a CoCoSo-D Method Based on Sine Trigonometric Interaction Operational Laws with Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Energies, 15, Article 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Peng, X. and Yang, Y. (2015) Fundamental Properties of Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31, 444-487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Rani, P., Alrasheedi, A.F., Mishra, A.R. and Cavallaro, F. (2023) Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Operational Competitiveness Rating Model for Assessing the Metaverse Integration Options of Sharing Economy in Transportation Sector. Applied Soft Computing, 148, Article 110806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Rani, P., Pamucar, D., Mishra, A.R., Hezam, I.M., Ali, J. and Ahammad, S.K.H. (2024) An Integrated Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy WISP Approach for Industry 4.0 Technology Assessment and Digital Transformation. Annals of Operations Research, 342, 1235-1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kauers, M., Pillwein, V. and Saminger-Platz, S. (2011) Dominance in the Family of Sugeno-Weber T-Norms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 181, 74-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Sarkar, A., Senapati, T., Jin, L., Mesiar, R., Biswas, A. and Yager, R.R. (2023) Sugeno-Weber Triangular Norm-Based Aggregation Operators under T-Spherical Fuzzy Hypersoft Context. Information Sciences, 645, Article 119305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ashraf, S., Iqbal, W., Ahmad, S. and Khan, F. (2023) Circular Spherical Fuzzy Sugeno Weber Aggregation Operators: A Novel Uncertain Approach for Adaption a Programming Language for Social Media Platform. IEEE Access, 11, 124920-124941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Pamucar, D., Lazarević, D., Dobrodolac, M., Simic, V. and Görçün, Ö.F. (2024) Prioritization of Crowdsourcing Models for Last-Mile Delivery Using Fuzzy Sugeno-Weber Framework. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 128, Article 107414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Petchimuthu, S., M., F.B., Pillai, S.T. and Senapati, T. (2025) Advancing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies: Integrating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Complex Q-Rung Picture Fuzzy Sugeno-Weber Operators. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 151, Article 110621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Yu, D. (2016) Softmax Function Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Applications. Operational Research, 16, 327-348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Wang, H., Mahmood, T. and Ullah, K. (2023) Improved CoCoSo Method Based on Frank Softmax Aggregation Operators for T-Spherical Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 25, 1275-1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. and Antucheviciene, J. (2012) Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 122, 3-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Akram, M., Ali, U., Santos-García, G. and Niaz, Z. (2022) 2-Tuple Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy MAGDM Based on the WASPAS Method for Selection of Solid Waste Disposal Location. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 20, 3811-3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Aytekin, A., Görçün, Ö.F., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D. and Karamaşa, Ç. (2022) Evaluation of the Pharmaceutical Distribution and Warehousing Companies through an Integrated Fermatean Fuzzy Entropy-WASPAS Approach. Kybernetes, 52, 5561-5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Anjum, M., Simic, V., Alrasheedi, M.A. and Shahab, S. (2024) T-Spherical Fuzzy-CRITIC-WASPAS Model for the Evaluation of Cooperative Intelligent Transportation System Scenarios. IEEE Access, 12, 61137-61151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Zhang, X., Dai, L. and Wan, B. (2023) NA Operator-Based Interval-Valued Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy PSI-COPRAS Group Decision-Making Method. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 25, 198-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef