论教育之爱的异化与归因
On the Alienation and Attribution of Educational Love
摘要: 本文从爱和教育的本质出发,从主体和方向对教育爱的定义进行了拓展诠释,称其为“教育之爱”。阐述了教育之爱的理论基础,强调其应建立在自由、平等和尊重的基础上。分析了当前教育领域内教育之爱的异化现象,包括关心的错位、尊重的遗失以及责任的扭曲,指出这些现象源于教育目的工具化与教育者价值秩序受到影响导致的爱的能力的缺失。通过反思这些现象,呼吁教育者应重新审视教育之爱的本质,思考何以重拾爱的能力。
Abstract: Starting from the essence of love and education, this paper expands the definition of love in education from the subject and direction, calling it “educational love”. It elaborates the theoretical foundation of educational love, emphasizing that it should be based on freedom, equality and respect. It analyzes the alienation of educational love in the current educational field, including the misplacement of concern, the loss of respect and the distortion of responsibility, pointing out that these phenomena stem from the lack of the ability to love due to the instrumentalization of the purpose of education and the influence of the value order of educators. Through reflecting on these phenomena, educators are called upon to re-examine the nature of love in education and to consider how to regain the capacity to love.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
高德胜. 论爱与教育爱[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2018(12): 49-55.
|
|
[2]
|
任强. 教育之爱的缺失与丰盈——基于马克斯∙舍勒“爱的秩序”的教育反思[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020, 40(18): 75-82.
|
|
[3]
|
崔德华, 张澍军. 论爱的定义与本质[J]. 江汉论坛, 2007(5): 69-73.
|
|
[4]
|
马克斯∙舍勒. 爱的秩序[M]. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 1995: 28.
|
|
[5]
|
田友谊, 韩雪童. 人工智能时代教育爱三重特质的异化与复归[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(10): 38-44.
|
|
[6]
|
王道俊, 郭文安. 教育学[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2016: 13.
|
|
[7]
|
吕狂飚. 教育爱的先验论证及其规范性意涵[J]. 教育学报, 2020, 16(1): 16-26.
|
|
[8]
|
中华人民共和国教育部制定. 普通高中物理课程标准(2017年版) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2018: 5.
|
|
[9]
|
谢桂新. 微观视域的教育爱: 异化、归因与重塑[J]. 惠州学院学报, 2021, 41(2): 23-27.
|
|
[10]
|
谢桂新. 宏观视域下的教育爱: 内涵、异化与重铸[J]. 教育导刊, 2019(7): 10-14.
|
|
[11]
|
翁红波. 重新理解教师偏见[J]. 上海教育科研, 2017(11): 19-23.
|