社会结构的变革路径——基于晚期阿尔都塞的原子–结构机制
Paths of Change in the Social Structure—Based on Late Althusserian Atomic-Structural Mechanisms
摘要: 代表着社会中偶然相遇的人与事的原子,能否带来社会有历史性高度的变革,是晚期阿尔都塞研究的核心问题。部分学者基于原子运动的偶然性对变革做出了历史偶然论的理解,实质上复现了阿尔都塞所批判的起源哲学和目的论。阿尔都塞文本中原子的相遇并非纯粹偶然,而是始终受到未来的结构的约束与规定,从而为原子运动提供了确定性。在这一“未来决定当下”的机制下,结构并非不断自我复制的稳定结果,而始终处于有待被未来决定的不稳定性和开放性之中,这为结构质的变化提供了可能性。具体而言,未来的结构先在地塑造了革命者缺席的样貌,引导革命者的主体性,主体性的介入则回溯性地创造了未来结构生成的条件。
Abstract: The question of whether atoms, which represent people and things that meet by chance in society, can bring about change in society with a high degree of historicity is at the centre of late Althusserian studies. Some scholars have developed a historically contingent understanding of change based on the contingent nature of the movement of atoms, essentially reproducing the philosophy of origins and teleology that Althusser criticised. The encounter of atoms in Althusser’s text is not purely accidental, but is always bound and regulated by the structure of the future, which provides certainty to the movement of atoms. Under this mechanism of “the future determining the present”, the structure is not a stable result of continuous self-replication, but is always in a state of instability and openness to be determined by the future, which provides the possibility of qualitative changes in the structure. Specifically, the structure of the future shapes the absence of the revolutionary a priori, guiding the subjectivity of the revolutionary, while the intervention of subjectivity retrospectively creates the conditions for the generation of the structure of the future.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Negri, A. (1996) Notes on the Evolution of the Thought of the Later Althusser Callari. In: Callari, A. and Ruccio, D.F., Eds., Postmodern Materialism and the Future of Marxist Theory: Essays in the Althusserian Tradition, University Press of New England, 34-39.
|
|
[2]
|
Raymond, P. (1997) Le matérialisme d’Althusser. In: Raymond, P., Ed., Althusser Philosophe, Presses Universitaires de France, 167-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Montag, W. (2013) Althusser and His Contemporaries: Philosophy’s Perpetual War. Duke University Press, 173-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Fourtounis, G. (2013) “An Immense Aspiration to Being”: The Causality and Temporality of the Aleatory. In: Diefenbach, K., Ed., Encountering Althusser: Politics and Materialism in Contemporary Radical Thought, Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 43-60.
|
|
[5]
|
阿尔都塞. 怎么办[M]. 陈越, 王宁泊, 张靖松, 译. 西安: 西北大学出版社, 2023: 43.
|
|
[6]
|
Althusser, L. (2006) Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978-1987. Verso, 1-237.
|
|
[7]
|
阿尔都塞. 保卫马克思[M]. 顾良, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2010: 102-103.
|
|
[8]
|
休谟. 人类理解研究[M]. 关文运, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006: 40-43.
|
|
[9]
|
阿尔都塞. 马基雅维利与我们[M]//陈越, 编译. 哲学与政治: 阿尔都塞读本. 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 2003: 376-504.
|
|
[10]
|
夏莹. 无主体的主体性: 当代法国哲学中的主体政治系谱学[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 37(4): 16-24.
|
|
[11]
|
林青. 理论配置与政治拓扑学空间——阿尔都塞文本解释学新探[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2014(3): 112-117.
|