林业经济学术英语词汇表的构建
Construction of Academic English Glossary for Forestry Economics
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.137728, PDF,   
作者: 崔 超：内蒙古农业大学外国语言学院，内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 林学经济；学术词表；术语；Forestry Economics； Academic Glossary； Terminology
摘要: 随着林业经济研究的深入和国际学术交流的增加，林业经济学术英语词汇表的构建显得尤为重要。本文通过分析现有林业经济术语表的不足，结合语料库语言学、计量语言学和自然语言处理技术，系统构建了林业经济领域的专业英文词汇表。研究采用多源语料库构建方法，涵盖学术论文、行业报告、政策文件等多种文本类型，通过频数分析、频率比计算和Zipf定律验证等计量语言学方法筛选词汇。同时，运用聚类分析和专家反馈优化词汇表，确保其科学性和实用性。研究结果表明，构建的词汇表在林业经济文本中的覆盖率较高，且在词汇复杂度、词频分布等方面与通用英文词汇表存在显著差异。本文进一步探讨了词汇表在教学、研究和国际交流中的应用价值，并提出了未来研究方向，包括扩大语料库规模、改进筛选方法和动态更新机制。研究成果为林业经济学科的英文教学与研究提供了重要参考，同时也为其他学科的术语表构建提供了方法论启示。
Abstract: With the deepening of forestry economics research and the increase in international academic exchanges, the construction of an academic English glossary for forestry economics has become particularly important. This paper systematically constructs a professional English glossary for the field of forestry economics by analyzing the deficiencies of existing forestry economics termbase and integrating corpus linguistics, quantitative linguistics, and natural language processing technologies. The study adopts a multi-source corpus construction method, covering various text types such as academic papers, industry reports, and policy documents. Vocabulary is screened through quantitative linguistics methods including frequency analysis, frequency ratio calculation, and verification by Zipf’s law. Meanwhile, cluster analysis and expert feedback are used to optimize the glossary, ensuring its scientific validity and practicality. The research results show that the constructed glossary has a high coverage rate in forestry economics texts, and there are significant differences in vocabulary complexity and frequency distribution compared with general English glossaries. This paper further discusses the application value of the glossary in teaching, research, and international exchanges, and proposes future research directions, including expanding the corpus scale, improving screening methods, and establishing dynamic update mechanisms. The research findings provide important references for English teaching and research in forestry economics, and also offer methodological insights for termbase construction in other disciplines.
文章引用：崔超. 林业经济学术英语词汇表的构建[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(7): 433-448. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.137728

参考文献

[1] Egan, A.F., Waldron, K., et al. (1999) Ecosystem Management in the Northeast: A Forestry Paradigm Shift? Journal of Forestry, 97, 36-41.
[2] Fisher, B. and Turner, R.K. (2009) Ecosystem Services: Classification for Valuation. Biological Conservation, 142, 2163-2169.
[3] Riccioli, P., et al. (2018) Recreational Values of Forests Under Different Management Systems: A Case-Study in Central Italy. New Forests, 49, 121-137.
[4] Trentanovi, G., Campagnaro, T., Sitzia, T., Chianucci, F., Vacchiano, G., Ammer, C., et al. (2023) Words Apart: Standardizing Forestry Terms and Definitions across European Biodiversity Studies. Forest Ecosystems, 10, Article ID: 100128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] 王振亚. 基于信息技术的林业智慧监测管理系统——评《林业数据管理发布系统研究与实践》附视频[J]. 世界林业研究, 2024, 37(4): 141-142.
[6] 宋佳苗. 基于语料库的林学英语技术词汇表创建[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2024.
[7] Carrion, B., Onorati, T., Díaz, P. and Triga, V. (2019) A Taxonomy Generation Tool for Semantic Visual Analysis of Large Corpus of Documents. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78, 32919-32937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Arora, C., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L. and Zimmer, F. (2017) Automated Extraction and Clustering of Requirements Glossary Terms. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 43, 918-945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Schneider, J.W. (2005) Verification of Bibliometric Methods’ Applicability for Thesaurus Construction. ACM SIGIR Forum, 39, 63-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] 游金干, 何家宁. 通用学术词表的对比研究——选词、评估和分级标准[J]. 山东外语教学, 2016, 37(6): 50-58.
[11] 崔维霞, 王均松. 基于语料库的词表创建原则及方法研究[J]. 中国科技术语, 2013, 15(2): 15-19.
[12] 孙倩, 万建成. 基于叙词表的领域本体构建方法研究[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2007(20): 5054-5056.
[13] Mader, C. (2012) Quality Assurance in Collaboratively Created Web Vocabularies. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O. and Presutti, V., Eds., The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. ESWC 2012, Springer, 870-874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] 陈幸良. 林下经济学的缘起、发展与展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6): 105-114.
[15] Visser, L. (2004) Development Sociology and the Interaction between the Social and Natural Sciences. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 1, 69-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Silva, H.A.d., Santos, L.A.C., Pacheco, A.R., Calil, F.N. and Silva-Neto, C.d.M.e. (2021) Produção de conhecimento em sistemas de integração lavoura pecuária floresta: uma análise cienciométrica. Revista Ecologia e Nutrição Florestal—ENFLO, 9, e03. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 傅一敏, 吴俊超, 周莹莹, 等. 林业经济管理学科学术网络、研究主题历史演变及启示——基于林业经济期刊(1979-2019)文献的可视化分析[J]. 中国林业经济, 2021(5): 20-23, 45.
[18] Zwerts, J.A., van der Linde, C.M., Praamstra, G.J., Schipper, J., Trolliet, F., Waeber, P.O., et al. (2024) Feasibility and Effectiveness of Global Intact Forest Landscape Protection through Forest Certification: The Conservation Burden of Intact Forest Landscapes. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7, Article 1335430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 中国林业科学研究院林业科技信息研究所, 中国林学会, 河北农业大学人文社会科学学院, 等. 林下经济: 概念辨析与内涵演变[J]. 世界林业研究, 2024, 37(2): 1-7.
[20] Olhoff, A., Christensen, J.M. (2015) Opportunities for Bridging the Gap. In: Olhoff, A., Christensen, J.M., Burgon, P., Kim Bakkegaard, R., Larsen, C. and Schletz, M., Eds., The Emissions Gap Report 2015: A UNEP Synthesis Report. United Nations Environment Programme.
[21] 吴伟光, 许骞骞, 羊凌玉, 等. 林业增汇潜力及其对中国碳中和的经济影响分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2024(8): 128-144.
[22] 刘裕生. 林业调查规划设计存在的问题及对策探析[J]. 农村科学实验, 2024(11): 148-150.
[23] 高瑞贺, 崔绍朋, 张志伟. 林学一流本科专业建设背景下森林昆虫学应用型人才培养教学改革探究[J]. 现代园艺, 2024, 47(20): 189-191.
[24] 张天霖. 浅析林业技术创新及现代林业发展[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2024, 44(7): 62-63.
[25] 赖世红. 林业产业结构优化与调整方略[J]. 中国林业产业, 2024(4): 67-69.
[26] 陈燕瑶. 林场生态保护与林下经济可持续发展探究[J]. 河南农业, 2024(8): 50-52.