基于语料库的国际硕士生作文中词块的对比研究
A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Lexical Bundles in Assignments Written by Master’s Level International Students
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2025.137738, PDF,   
作者: 马笑麒:布里斯托大学教育学院,英国 布里斯托
关键词: 第二语言写作基于语料库的研究词块对比研究L2 Writing Corpus-Based Study Lexical Bundle Comparative Study
摘要: 在第二语言写作中,词块(lexical bundles)的重要性日益受到重视,已有研究探讨了二语写作中词块产出的特征与问题。然而,针对英语母语学生在使用词块过程中的发展特征与准确性问题的研究仍较为有限。本研究收集了29名国际学生在其研究生阶段撰写的课程作业,构建了一个包含超过8万个词的子语料库,旨在分析这些就读教育专业的国际学生在写作时所使用词块的模式。研究在语料库中提取高频词块,并依据Biber等人提出的分类体系及母语者写作中的目标词块,将其划分为六种结构类型和三种功能类型,进而对其频率与分布特征进行对比分析。研究结果显示:在词块的使用数量方面,国际学生整体使用偏少;但从使用的多样性来看,其词块的丰富性更高。在结构类型上,国际学生在使用以介词短语构成的词块(如含有of-短语的介词结构)和以名词短语构成的词块(如含有后置修饰语的名词结构)方面的频率明显低于母语学生。本研究有助于提升二语学习者对词块规范使用的重视,同时也为今后的写作教学中的目标设定与实践提供了有益启示。
Abstract: Lexical bundles in second language writing have been increasingly emphasized, researchers have explored the characteristics and problems of lexical bundles output in second language writing. However, few studies have addressed the developmental characteristics and accuracy issues of lexical bundles in the use of lexical bundles by native English speaker students. This study included a corpus of 29 students’ assignments writing during their postgraduate studies, creating a sub-corpus of over 80,000 tokens in order to explore the patterns of lexical bundles among the same cohort of international students majoring in education when they were writing their assignments. After extracting the high-frequency lexical bundles from the corpus, this study classified these bundles into six structural and three functional types based on Biber et al.’s taxonomy of bundles and the target bundles in native speakers’ assignments writing, and comparatively analyzed their frequency and distributional features. The results show that international students under-use lexical bundles in terms of quantity, but the richness of lexical bundles is higher. In terms of structure, international students use PP-based bundles (prepositional phrase with of-phrase fragment and other prepositional phrase fragments) and NP-based bundles (noun phrase with of-phrase fragment and noun phrase with other post-modifier fragments) less frequently than native students. This study is conducive to increasing the importance of second language learners’ correct use of lexical bundles, and it is also informative for the goal-setting and practicing process of writing teaching in the future.
文章引用:马笑麒. 基于语料库的国际硕士生作文中词块的对比研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2025, 13(7): 522-532. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.137738

参考文献

[1] Hoffmann, C. (2000) 1 the Spread of English and the Growth of Multilingualism with English in Europe. In: Cenoz, J. and Jessner, U., Eds., English in Europe, Multilingual Matters, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Du, J. (2013) The Use of Lexical Bundles by Chinese EFL English-Major Undergraduates at Different University Levels: A Corpus-Based Study of L2 Learners’ Examination Essays. PhD Thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
[3] Qin, J. (2014) Use of Formulaic Bundles by Non-Native English Graduate Writers and Published Authors in Applied Linguistics. System, 42, 220-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ellis, N.C., Simpson‐Vlach, R. and Maynard, C. (2008) Formulaic Language in Native and Second Language Speakers: Psycholinguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 375-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Crossley, S. and Salsbury, T.L. (2011) The Development of Lexical Bundle Accuracy and Production in English Second Language Speakers. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Hyland, K. (2008) Academic Clusters: Text Patterning in Published and Postgraduate Writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 41-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Durrant, P. and Schmitt, N. (2009) To What Extent Do Native and Non-Native Writers Make Use of Collocations? IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 157-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kaszubski, P. (2006) Ideas from the Corpora. Humanising Language Teaching Magazine.
http://old.hltmag.co.uk/jul06/idea.htm
[9] Nesselhauf, N. (2005) Collocations in a Learner Corpus. John Benjamins Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Meng, Y.R., Huang, X.Y. and Fan, X.H. (2025) A Diachronic Study on the Developmental Characteristics of Lexical Bundle Competence in English Writing. Language Education, 13, 110-118.
[11] Wei, Y. and Lei, L. (2011) Lexical Bundles in the Academic Writing of Advanced Chinese EFL Learners. RELC Journal, 42, 155-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Pawley, A. and Syder, F.H. (2014) Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency. In: Language and Communication, Routledge, 191-226.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315836027-14/two-puzzles-linguistic-theory-andrew-pawley-frances-hodgetts-syder
[13] Cortes, V. (2004) Lexical Bundles in Published and Student Disciplinary Writing: Examples from History and Biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397-423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ädel, A. and Erman, B. (2012) Recurrent Word Combinations in Academic Writing by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: A Lexical Bundles Approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 81-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Chen, Y.-H. and Baker, P. (2010) Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing.
https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44213/1/14_02_chenbaker.pdf
[16] Chen, Y.-H. and Baker, P. (2016) Investigating Criterial Discourse Features across Second Language Development: Lexical Bundles in Rated Learner Essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37, 849-880.
[17] Esfandiari, R. and Barbary, F. (2017) A Contrastive Corpus-Driven Study of Lexical Bundles between English Writers and Persian Writers in Psychology Research Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 21-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Yang, Y. (2017) Lexical Bundles in Argumentative and Narrative Writings by Chinese EFL Learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7, 58-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (2000) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written Eng-lish. Longman.
http://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume4/ej15/ej15r14/?wscr
[20] Simpson-Vlach, R. and Ellis, N.C. (2010) An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics, 31, 487-512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Biber, D. (2004) If You Look at ...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Hyland, K. (2008) As Can Be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Biber, D., Connor, U. and Upton, T.A. (2007) Discourse on the Move. John Benjamins Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Hu, J., Shi, H. and Ji, P. (2017) Structural and Functional Characteristics of Discourse Word Blocks for English Learners and Native Speakers. Foreign Language Education, 38, 57-64.
[25] Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (2014) On the Exploitation of Computerized Corpora in Variation Studies. In: English Corpus Linguistics, Routledge, 204-220.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315845890-17/exploitation-computerized-corpora-variation-studies-douglas-biber-edward-finegan
[26] Ellis, N. (2003) Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition/Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef