拔尖创新人才早期学习投入的心理促进机制
Psychological Promotion Mechanism for Early Learning Engagement of Top-Notch Innovative Talents
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.157406, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 焦松明, 时 勘*：温州大学生态文明与环境治理实验室，浙江 温州
关键词: 拔尖创新人才；学习投入；自主支持；理论探索；发展建议；Top-Notch Innovative Talents； Learning Engagement； Autonomous Support； Theoretical Exploration； Development Suggestions
摘要: 本文旨在探索拔尖创新人才早期在成长过程中的心理促进机制，为促进青少年能力发展提供依据。通过文献检阅探索拔尖创新人才学习投入的影响因素，发现父母自我支持、教师自我支持、青少年的自我探索是促进其学习投入的关键因素，而生命意义感能够激发对学习的热爱，主观幸福感则能提升面对挑战的自信心。本文从学习习惯养成、创新品格培养、身心健康发展和基础环境支持等四方面提出了教育建议，并从学校管理、教师素养、家庭支持和社区助力等方面提出了培养策略和发展建议。
Abstract: This article aims to explore the psychological promotion mechanism of Top-notch innovative talents in their early growth process, providing a basis for promoting the development of young people’s abilities. Through literature review, we explored the factors influencing the learning engagement of Top-notch innovative talents and found that parental self-support, teacher self-support, and adolescent self exploration are key factors in promoting their learning engagement. The sense of meaning in life can stimulate their love for learning, and subjective well-being can enhance their confidence in facing challenges. This article puts forward educational suggestions from four aspects: cultivating study habits, cultivating innovative character, promoting physical and mental health development, and providing basic environmental support. It also proposes training strategies and development suggestions from school management, teacher literacy, family support, and community assistance.
文章引用：焦松明, 时勘 (2025). 拔尖创新人才早期学习投入的心理促进机制. 心理学进展, 15(7), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.157406

参考文献

[1] 陈群林(2022). 脑科学研究对青少年创新素养培养的启示. 教育家, (9), 71-72.
[2] 方来坛, 时勘, 张风华(2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-620.
[3] 耿学良(2025). 河北历史开放性试题在拔尖创新人才培养中的实践研究. 教学考试, (17), 4-6.
[4] 李慧慧(2024). 生态系统理论视角下农村留守儿童偏差行为的个案介入研究. 硕士学位论文, 青岛: 青岛科技大学.
[5] 师保国, 单宏宇(2024). 拔尖创新人才的早期特征与培养: 创新品格的视角. 人民教育, (12), 18-21.
[6] 席居哲, 王云汐, 鞠康(2022). 积极心理学视角的重大突发公共卫生事件的心理干预. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 181-188.
[7] 张荣伟(2018). 大学生生命意义感的特点及影响机制. 博士学位论文, 上海: 上海师范大学.
[8] Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice Is Good, but Relevance Is Excellent: Autonomy-Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261-278.
[9] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a Model of Work Engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209-223.
[10] Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Volume 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development (6th ed., pp. 793-828). John Wiley & Sons.
[11] Buhs, E. S., Squires, D., Furman, W., & Johnson, D. W. (2017). The Development of Academic Engagement: The Role of Genetic Factors and the Classroom Social Environment. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1664-1676.
[12] Cheung, C. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2011). Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Learning in the United States and China: Implications for Children’s Academic and Emotional Adjustment. Child Development, 82, 932-950.
[13] Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating Autonomy from Individualism and Independence: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Internalization of Cultural Orientations and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-110.
[14] Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness: A Motivational Analysis of Self-System Processes. In M. R. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self Processes and Development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 87-112). Erlbaum.
[15] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The Support of Autonomy and the Control of Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
[16] Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2021). Advances in Subjective Well-Being Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Possibilities. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 465-484.
[17] Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy. Beacon Press.
[18] Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.
[19] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
[20] González, A. R., Holbein, M. F. D., & Quilter, S. (2002). High School Students’ Goal Orientations and Their Relationship to Perceived Autonomy Support from Teachers and Parents. Journal of Research in Education, 12, 53-63.
[21] Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Autonomy Support in Children’s Learning: A Parent’s Perspective. In P. R. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 395-431). Oxford University Press.
[22] Heller, K. A. (2009). The Nature and Development of Giftedness: A Longitudinal Study. European Journal of High Ability, 1, 36-52.
[23] Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2004). Creative Thinking and Learning: A Study of Attitudes to Risk Taking among Academic Researchers. Higher Education Policy, 17, 177-192.
[24] Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Bedell, K. D. (2016). Autonomy-Supportive Environment, Students’ Autonomous Motivation, and Their Educational Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 57-87.
[25] Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 588-600.
[26] Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2012). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It’s Not Autonomy Support or Structure, but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 268-284.
[27] Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Parenting. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 194-200.
[28] Joussemet, M., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., & Cote, S. (2005). A Transactional Approach to the Academic Achievement and Deviancy of High School Students. Developmental Psychology, 41, 447-460.
[29] Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Buzukashvily, T. (2011). The Role of Autonomy Support in Moderating the Link between Structure and Well-Being: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 715-730.
[30] King, L. A., Heintzelman, S. J., & Ward, A. B. (2014). The Experience of Meaning in Life. In A. C. Parks & S. H. Schulz (Eds.), The Positive Psychology of Meaning and Value (pp. 160-171). American Psychological Association.
[31] Liu, Y., & Gan, Y. (2010). Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 24, 547-552.
[32] Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
[33] Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The Three Meanings of Meaning in Life: Distinguishing Coherence, Purpose, and Significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 531-545.
[34] Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Liu, Z. (2015). Fitting in or Standing out: The Role of Culture in Shaping the Relationship between Product Conformity and Product Success. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 1423-1442.
[35] Reeve, J. (2009). Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159-175.
[36] Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
[37] Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Autonomy-Supportive Teaching and Student Engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 99-120). Springer.
[38] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
[39] Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., & Bresó, E. (2010). How Obstacles and Facilitators Predict Academic Performance: The Mediating Role of Study Burnout and Engagement. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 23, 53-70.
[40] Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.
[41] Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Routledge.
[42] Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and Outcomes of Self-Determination in 3 Life Domains: The Role of Parents’ and Teachers’ Autonomy Support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604.[CrossRef] 
[43] Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80-93.[CrossRef] 
[44] Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 87-98.
[45] Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260.
[46] Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Autonomous Motivation, Academic Achievement, and Well-Being: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 244-259.
[47] Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). Social Support Matters: Longitudinal Effects of Social and Behavioral Supports on Three Different Types of School Outcomes. Child Development, 84, 1585-1601.
[48] Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Parents, Teachers, and Peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.
[49] West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in Top Management Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680-693.[CrossRef] 
[50] Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of Biopsychosocial Values by Medical Students: A Test of Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.
[51] Zhang, J., Meng, L., & Wang, Z. (2018). The Effect of Meaning in Life on Academic Engagement in Chinese Students: The Mediating Role of Academic Self-Efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 68, 39-48.
[52] Zhou, M., Ma, W., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). The Relation of Parental Autonomy Support and Parental Control with the Academic Performance of Adolescents in China: Secondary School Students’ Motivation as a Mediator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 477-487.