同伴侵害对青少年社交焦虑的影响——问题性手机使用与社交回避的链式中介作用
The Impact of Peer Victimization on Adolescent Social Anxiety—A Chain Mediation Model of Problematic Mobile Phone Use and Social Avoidance
摘要: 为探究青少年同伴侵害与社交焦虑的作用,本研究基于厦门市1977名11~18岁青少年的问卷调查数据,构建包含青少年问题性手机的使用与社交回避的理论模型,揭示了“环境压力→行为代偿→认知固化→焦虑加剧”的递进机制。通过相关分析及链式中介效应检验发现:(1) 同伴侵害显著正向预测社交焦虑(总效应β = 0.108,p < 0.001),并通过问题性手机使用(β = 0.228, p < 0.001)和社交回避(β = 0.332, p < 0.001)的链式中介路径间接加剧社交焦虑(β = 0.009, 95% CI [0.008, 0.023]);(2) 链式中介模型中,同伴侵害不直接作用于社交焦虑(c’ = 0.006, p > 0.05),且中介效应占比94.44%,模型为完全中介;(3) 中介效应对比显示,社交回避路径(同伴侵害→社交回避→社交焦虑) (β = 0.071,占比65.74%)的作用强于问题性手机使用频率路径(同伴侵害→问题性手机使用→社交焦虑) (β = 0.022,占比20.37%)。研究表明,同伴侵害通过增加问题性手机使用,引起现实生活的社交回避,从而加重青少年社交焦虑,其中社交回避的中介效应占据主导。因此,依据Bronfenbrenner的生态系统理论,有必要实施以学校和家庭为基础的多维度干预措施,具体包括减少同伴侵害、规范手机使用、促进线下社交互动,以及增强家庭支持系统(例如改善亲子沟通和培养安全依恋关系),从而全方位缓解青少年的社交焦虑。
Abstract: To explore the mechanisms underlying the relationship between peer victimization and social anxiety among adolescents, this study constructed a theoretical model incorporating problematic mobile phone use and social avoidance based on survey data from 1,977 adolescents aged 11~18 in Xiamen middle schools. Correlation analysis and chain mediation tests revealed the following findings: (1) Peer victimization significantly and positively predicted social anxiety (β = 0.108, p < 0.001), mainly mediated by problematic phone use (β = 0.228) and social avoidance (β = 0.332), indirectly exacerbating social anxiety ( β = 0.009, 95% CI [0.008, 0.023]); (2) No direct effect of peer victimization on social anxiety was observed (c’ = 0.006, p > 0.05), and the mediating effect accounted for 94.44% of the total effect; (3) The social avoidance pathway (β = 0.071, 65.74% of total effect) dominated over the phone use pathway (β = 0.022, 20.37% of total effect). These results suggest that peer victimization exacerbates social anxiety via increased phone reliance and online social preference, which collectively drive real-world social avoidance. Notably, social avoidance emerge as the dominant mediator in this mechanism. Based on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, these findings underscore the necessity of implementing school- and family-based multidimensional interventions, specifically targeting the reduction of peer victimization, regulation of mobile phone use, promotion of offline social engagement, and enhancement of family support systems (e.g., improving parent-adolescent communication and fostering secure attachment) to holistically alleviate social anxiety.
文章引用:陈珊, 邓欣媚 (2025). 同伴侵害对青少年社交焦虑的影响——问题性手机使用与社交回避的链式中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(7), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.157407

参考文献

[1] 陈万芬, 肖博文(2025). 青少年社交敏感性对心理适应的影响: 文化和同伴侵害的作用. 苏州科技大学学报(社会科学版), 42(1), 44-52+108.
[2] 窦凯, 黎彦余, 王林欣, 聂衍刚(2023). 错失恐惧还是社交回避? 同伴排斥对粤澳青少年问题性社交媒体使用的影响. 心理科学, 46(5), 1081.
[3] 冯菊(2023). 同伴侵害与青少年问题性社交媒体使用的关系: 一项混合方法研究. 硕士学位论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学.
[4] 郭玉华(2022). 家庭教养方式与青少年社交焦虑的关系: 拒绝敏感性和孤独感的作用. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[5] 侯艳天, 朱海东, 石耀慧, 贾晓珊(2022). 大学生社交焦虑的潜在剖面及影响因素. 中国健康心理学杂志, 30(9), 1406-1412.
[6] 李升岚, 陶嵘, 郑晶(2018). 情绪障碍患者的未来情景思考异常及相关干预. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 506-511.
[7] 刘家慧(2024). 自然联结与青少年社交媒体依赖的关系: 生命意义感和错失恐惧的中介作用及其干预. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[8] 刘莹(2021). 家庭功能对青少年社交媒体成瘾的影响: 社交焦虑与心理韧性的链式中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学.
[9] 谭文琦(2024). 同伴侵害与初中生抑郁的关系及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 桂林: 广西师范大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=fSCzX0TVvUhNFKtqW2yn-NCodTFFpyVyAoqrRv0GZQGXurcxOOI_FB8xk79X9Mg1I0taRw0eYNseZtf2rBtuF2zIuSCTHZcOV422nGjX8_QE204QGSvauHub8P3fxLhYxk3cQjXr9p6eWN4lmeJOJfflCnnDpV3dOXESK-P5pi6lM04M5X0MKtqkhlVZJdSS&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
[10] 汪星辰(2020). 大学新生社交障碍的干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京农业大学.
[11] 王爽(2025). 聚而不群: 数媒时代大学生“孤独社交”现象的生成逻辑与教育反思. 黑龙江高教研究, 43(3), 131-137.
[12] 王希, 董蕊, 李思佳,, 倪士光(2017). 虚拟现实暴露疗法在社交焦虑中的应用: 效果, 机制及展望. 心理科学, 40(6), 1504.
[13] 王志胜, 于战宇, 许刘之垚(2024). 羞怯个体在网络与现实情境中的自我表露差异与VR干预研究. 心理学进展, 14(2), 555-563.
[14] 余梦婷(2023). 同伴侵害对青少年社交焦虑的影响. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 广州大学.
[15] 张娟, 张大均(2019). 不同心理素质水平大学生对情绪面孔的记忆偏向. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 41(6), 58-63.
[16] 周榕, 郭佳瑞(2023). 虚拟现实技术与社会-情感学习融合的框架设计研究. 远程教育杂志, 41(3), 94-103.
[17] Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review. Current Addiction Reports, 2, 175-184.[CrossRef
[18] Asendorpf, J. B. (1993). Beyond Temperament: A Two-Factorial Coping Model of the Development of Inhibition during Childhood. In K. H. Rubin, & J. B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social Withdrawal, Inhibition and Shyness in Childhood (pp. 265-289). Lawrence Erlbaum.
[19] Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects. Communication Research, 3, 3-21.[CrossRef
[20] Brehm, J. W. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press.
[21] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
[22] Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment (pp. 69-93). The Guilford Press.
[23] Cole, C. E., Zapp, D. J., Fettig, N. B., & Pérez-Edgar, K. (2016). Impact of Attention Biases to Threat and Effortful Control on Individual Variations in Negative Affect and Social Withdrawal in Very Young Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 210-221.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Coplan, R. J., & Armer, M. (2007). A “Multitude” of Solitude: A Closer Look at Social Withdrawal and Nonsocial Play in Early Childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 26-32.[CrossRef
[25] Deng, X., Zhang, S., Chen, X., Coplan, R. J., Xiao, B., & Ding, X. (2023). Links between Social Avoidance and Frontal Alpha Asymmetry During Processing Emotional Facial Stimuli: An Exploratory Study. Biological Psychology, 178, Article ID: 108516.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social Comparisons on Social Media: The Impact of Facebook on Young Women’s Body Image Concerns and Mood. Body Image, 13, 38-45.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company.
[28] Livingstone, S. (2024). Reflections on the Meaning of “Digital” in Research on Adolescents’ Digital Lives. Journal of Adolescence, 96, 886-891.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys. Hemisphere Pub.
[31] Resnik, F., & Bellmore, A. (2021). Is Peer Victimization Associated with Adolescents’ Social Media Use, Engagement, Behavior, and Content? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 67, 175-202.[CrossRef
[32] Saul, M. A., He, X., Black, S., & Charles, F. (2022). A Two-Person Neuroscience Approach for Social Anxiety: A Paradigm with Interbrain Synchrony and Neurofeedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 568921.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in Efficacy of Anti-Bullying Programs among Older Adolescents: Theory and a Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36-51.[CrossRef