基于3D打印技术的多孔隙率椎间融合器设计与生物力学分析
Design and Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Intervertebral Fusion Apparatus Based on 3D Printing Technology
摘要: 依据腰椎的原始数据,通过Mimics和Geomagics软件分别重建了腰椎C3和C4的模型,得到腰椎模型的基本数据。分别建立了简单立方多孔、体心立方多孔、面心立方多孔椎间融合器。对椎间融合器施加成年人腰部所受最大力并通过有限元分析求解应力、应变以及最大形变量。计算设计的椎间融合器的弹性模量、对不同孔隙率的多孔椎间融合器进行分析并优化设计结果。
Abstract: Based on the original data of the lumbar spine, the models of C3 and C4 of the lumbar spine were reconstructed by Mimics and Geomagics software, respectively, to obtain the basic data of the lumbar spine model. The simple cubic porous, body-centered cubic porous and face-centered cubic interbody fusion apparatus were established respectively. The maximum force on the lumbar of an adult was applied to the interbody fusion device and the stress, strain and maximum shape variables were calculated by finite element analysis. The elastic modulus of the designed interbody fusion cage was calculated, and the porous interbody fusion cage with different porosity was analyzed and the design results were optimized.
文章引用:张一伟, 石更强. 基于3D打印技术的多孔隙率椎间融合器设计与生物力学分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(7): 154-164. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.147524

参考文献

[1] Cheung, Z.B., Gidumal, S., White, S., Shin, J., Phan, K., Osman, N., et al. (2018) Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine Journal, 9, 446-455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Pan, F., Wang, S., Yong, Z., Liu, X., Huang, Y. and Wu, D. (2016) Risk Factors for Cage Retropulsion after Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Series of Cases and Literature Review. International Journal of Surgery, 30, 56-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Chong, E., Pelletier, M.H., Mobbs, R.J. and Walsh, W.R. (2015) The Design Evolution of Interbody Cages in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16, Article No. 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Suh, P.B., Puttlitz, C., Lewis, C., Bal, B.S. and McGilvray, K. (2017) The Effect of Cervical Interbody Cage Morphology, Material Composition, and Substrate Density on Cage Subsidence. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 25, 160-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Spetzger, U., Frasca, M. and König, S.A. (2016) Surgical Planning, Manufacturing and Implantation of an Individualized Cervical Fusion Titanium Cage Using Patient-Specific Data. European Spine Journal, 25, 2239-2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 周华, 王仁吉, 刘忠军, 等. 3D打印人工椎体在颈椎脊索瘤全脊椎切除术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 144-148.
[7] Li, P., Jiang, W., Yan, J., Hu, K., Han, Z., Wang, B., et al. (2019) A Novel 3D Printed Cage with Microporous Structure and in Vivo Fusion Function. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 107, 1386-1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Patel, D.V., Yoo, J.S., Karmarkar, S.S., Lamoutte, E.H. and Singh, K. (2019) Interbody Options in Lumbar Fusion. Journal of Spine Surgery, 5, S19-S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 杨琼琼, 刘玮. 氧化锆与钛种植体的性能及临床效果对比[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2026, 30(8): 2063-2071.
[10] 刘艳. 陶瓷材料在医疗植入物中的应用研究[J]. 陶瓷科学与艺术, 2024, 58(6): 46-47.