外围线索对网络媒体可信度的影响研究
The Impact of Peripheral Cues on Online Media Credibility
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.157413, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴 娟, 何志芳*, 桂 宸：江西中医药大学人文学院，江西 南昌
关键词: 媒体可信度；外围线索；信源可信度；评论效价；Media Credibility； Peripheral Cues； Source Credibility； Comment Valence
摘要: 互联网技术的飞速发展和信息传播方式的变革，网络媒体已成为人们获取信息、了解社会的重要渠道。传统的根据内容判断信息可信度的模式已不再受用，媒体的可信度问题日益明显，外围线索在人们快速判断信息可信度的过程中发挥着越来越重要的作用。本文基于精细加工可能性模型(ELM)理论和启发式线索从新闻信源可信度、评论效价以及用户个体因素这三个角度阐述对媒体可信度带来的影响。
Abstract: The rapid advancement of internet technology and transformations in information dissemination have established online media as a vital channel for people to access information and understand society. Traditional models of judging information credibility based solely on content are no longer adequate, making media credibility an increasingly prominent issue. Peripheral cues now play a crucial role in enabling people to quickly assess the credibility of information. Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) theory and heuristic cues. This study employs the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and heuristic cues theory to examine how news source credibility, comment valence, and user individual factors affect media credibility.
文章引用：吴娟, 何志芳, 桂宸 (2025). 外围线索对网络媒体可信度的影响研究. 心理学进展, 15(7), 147-151. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.157413

参考文献

[1] 包敦安, 董大海(2009). 基于ELM的网络评论信息可信性影响因素研究. 现代管理科学, (11), 107-109.
[2] 董庆兴, 王雪宁, 熊思玥(2024). 纠正是否有效?——纠正方式和错误健康信息启发式线索的影响研究. 新闻与传播研究, 31(4), 65-80+127.
[3] 杨弦, 王智慧, 吴江宁(2023). 奖励政策对不同用户群体在线评论效价和质量的影响研究. 计量经济学报, 3(3), 872-885.
[4] 喻国明(2019). 中国居民的媒介使用与媒介价值观研究——课题意义、研究框架与分析维度. 新闻与写作, (11), 55-60.
[5] Chao, F., Zhou, Q., Zhao, J., Xu, Y., & Yu, G. (2024). Trustworthiness Matters: Effect of Source Credibility on Sharing Debunking Information across Different Rumour Types. Information Processing & Management, 61, Article ID: 103747.[CrossRef] 
[6] Fawzi, N., Steindl, N., Obermaier, M., Prochazka, F., Arlt, D., Blöbaum, B. et al. (2021). Concepts, Causes and Consequences of Trust in News Media—A Literature Review and Framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45, 154-174.[CrossRef] 
[7] Greer, J. D. (2003). Evaluating the Credibility of Online Information: A Test of Source and Advertising Influence. Mass Communication and Society, 6, 11-28.[CrossRef] 
[8] Lopes, A. I., Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & De Keyzer, F. (2021). Which Cues Influence the Perceived Usefulness and Credibility of an Online Review? A Conjoint Analysis. Online Information Review, 45, 1-20.[CrossRef] 
[9] Mulckhuyse, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Unconscious Attentional Orienting to Exogenous Cues: A Review of the Literature. Acta Psychologica, 134, 299-309.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Pjesivac, I., Geidner, N., & Cameron, J. (2018). Social Credibility Online: The Role of Online Comments in Assessing News Article Credibility. Newspaper Research Journal, 39, 18-31.[CrossRef] 
[11] Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe It or Not: Factors Influencing Credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 134-144.[CrossRef] 
[12] Zhang, L., Wu, L., & Mattila, A. S. (2016). Online Reviews: The Role of Information Load and Peripheral Factors. Journal of Travel Research, 55, 299-310.[CrossRef]