基于灰色层次分析法的固定通信台站生存能力评估
Evaluation of The Survivability of Fixed Communication Stations Based on Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2025.147525, PDF,   
作者: 张 锐:陆军工程大学野战工程学院,江苏 南京;中国人民解放军61068部队,陕西 西安;屠义强, 黎 明:陆军工程大学野战工程学院,江苏 南京;庞小宁:中国人民解放军61068部队,陕西 西安
关键词: 固定通信台站生存能力评估灰色层次分析法Fixed Communication Station Survivability Assessment Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process
摘要: 固定通信台站作为信息通信系统的核心骨干节点,因位置固定性和组成复杂性,容易受到自然和社会多方面因素的影响和破坏,其生存能力直接关系到信息通信系统能否有效运行。文中针对现阶段固定通信台站生存能力评估主观性较强等缺点,综合考虑固定通信台站伪装防护能力、台站保障能力、装备维修能力因素,建立了固定通信台站生存能力评估指标体系,提出了基于灰色层次分析法的固定通信台站生存能力评估方法,构建了评估模型。实例分析表明,采用灰色层次分析法,克服了评估中外界影响因素主观判断的模糊性和专家打分的随机性影响,可针对性地对得分较低因素方面进行整改,有效提高台站生存能力。
Abstract: As the core backbone nodes of the information and communication system, due to the fixed location and complexity of composition, it is susceptible to the influence and destruction of natural and social factors, the survivability of fixed communication stations is directly related to whether the information and communication system can operate effectively. In view of the shortcomings of the survivability assessment of fixed communication stations at this stage, such as strong subjectivity in the evaluation of the survivability of fixed communication stations, the evaluation index system of the survivability of fixed communication stations is established, and the evaluation method of the survivability of fixed communication stations based on the grey hierarchy process is proposed, and the evaluation model is constructed. Finally, the example results show that the grey analytic hierarchy process is used to overcome the ambiguity of subjective judgment and the randomness of expert scoring in the evaluation, the factors with low scores can be rectified in a targeted manner to effectively improve the survivability of the station.
文章引用:张锐, 屠义强, 庞小宁, 黎明. 基于灰色层次分析法的固定通信台站生存能力评估[J]. 建模与仿真, 2025, 14(7): 165-174. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2025.147525

参考文献

[1] 马浩维, 朱文礼. 固定通信台站面临的安全问题与对策解析[J]. 科技创新导报, 2020, 17(13): 149, 151.
[2] 贾鑫铎. 分析通信台站的发展及应用[J]. 中国新通信, 2017, 19(16): 1.
[3] 杜思奇. 光纤通信网的生存性及经济性分析[J]. 中国新通信, 2017, 19(23): 24-25.
[4] 牟南南. 网络系统可生存性技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2017.
[5] 蔡艳军. 灰色层次分析法战术通信网抗干扰效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37(6): 106-108.
[6] 胡明辉, 李国军, 雷斌, 等. 短波固定通信台站装备维修保障能力评估研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2016, 37(8): 47-51.
[7] 栗志荣, 高崎, 刘慎洋, 等. 固定通信台站装备保障人员需求预测研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24(1): 179-184.
[8] 张奥然. 刍议军事通信台站防范电磁脉冲攻击破坏对策[J]. 无线互联科技, 2015(17): 10-11.
[9] 杜思深, 黄国策. 基于战场环境下通信台站的雷电及电磁武器防护设计[J]. 河北科技大学学报, 2011, 32(S1): 5-8, 13.
[10] 易平涛, 李伟伟, 郭亚军. 综合评价理论与方法[M]. 北京: 经理管理出版社, 2019.
[11] 刘思峰. 灰色系统理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
[12] 吴北苹, 何晶, 王彦璎, 等. 改进灰色层次分析法的机动导航保障能力评估[J]. 弹箭与制导学报,2024, 44(1): 75-82.
[13] Smith, J. (2024) Telemetry’s Ability to Enhance Communication. Ground Support Worldwide, 32, 16-18.
[14] Khan, M.S., King, R. and Hudson, I.L. (2017) Transmuted Generalized Exponential Distribution: A Generalization of the Exponential Distribution with Applications to Survival Data. Communications in StatisticsSimulation and Computation, 46, 4377-4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhang, Y., Hu, Z., Wang, Z., et al. (2023) Survivability Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Network based on Dynamic Weighted Clustering Algorithm with Dual Cluster Heads. Electronics, 12, Article 1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Truong, D.L., Dang, X.V. and Dang, T.N. (2023) Survivable Free Space Optical Mesh Network Using High-Altitude Platforms. Optical Switching and Networking, 47, Article ID: 100716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Zhang, X., Li, S., Liu, X., Jian, S., Li, S. and Yue, J. (2024) Research on the Establishment and Application of a Transportation Safety Supervision Evaluation System Based on Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sustainability, 16, Article 10600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Sousa, I.C.D., Sigahi, T.F.A.C., Rampasso, I.S., Pinto, J.D.S., Zanon, L.G., Leal Filho, W., et al. (2024) Analysis of the Quality of Sustainability Reports Published by Brazilian Companies: An Analytic Hierarchy Process‐Grey Clustering Approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31, 4298-4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef