地–巷可控源电磁三维反演算法研究
3-D Inversion Algorithm for Surface-Tunnel Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Data
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2025.157101, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 徐锦通：中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院院，湖南 长沙；刘寄仁*：湖南科技大学计算机科学与工程学院，湖南 湘潭
关键词: 可控源电磁法；三维反演；地面–巷道；Csem； 3D InVERSION； Surface-Tunnel
摘要: 可控源电磁法是一种重要的地球物理勘探方法，也是金属矿等战略性矿产资源的勘查的重要方法之一。常规的可控源电磁法通常采用地面发射–地面接收的观测装置，在一定程度上限制了其勘探深度。若使用地面发射–巷道接收的观测装置，在离地下目标体更近的巷道采集数据，有望提升对深部结构的探测能力。然而，当前地–巷可控源电磁法鲜有研究，为研究地–巷可控源电磁法的可行性和勘探效果，文章首先开发了地–巷可控源电磁三维反演算法，然后设计了理论地–巷勘探模型，对该模型进行了反演测试，结果表明，联合反演地面–巷道数据可有效提升可控源电磁法的深部探测分辨率，为地–巷可控源电磁法的实际应用提供了理论参考和依据。
Abstract: Controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method is a crucial geophysical exploration technique and plays a significant role in the exploration of strategic mineral resources such as metal ores. Conventional CSEM typically employs a surface transmitter-surface receiver configuration, which, to some extent, limits its exploration depth. By adopting a surface transmitter-underground tunnel receiver configuration, where data are collected in tunnels closer to underground targets, the detection capability for deep structures can potentially be enhanced. However, research on surface-tunnel CSEM remains scarce. To investigate the feasibility and exploration effectiveness of surface-tunnel CSEM, this paper first develops a 3D inversion algorithm for surface-tunnel CSEM. Subsequently, a theoretical surface-tunnel exploration model is designed, and inversion tests are conducted on this model. The results demonstrate that joint inversion of surface-tunnel data can effectively improve the resolution of CSEM for deep exploration, providing theoretical references and a foundation for the practical application of surface-tunnel CSEM.
文章引用：徐锦通, 刘寄仁. 地–巷可控源电磁三维反演算法研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2025, 15(7): 1090-1097. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2025.157101

参考文献

[1] Castillo-Reyes, O., Queralt, P., Marcuello, A. and Ledo, J. (2022) Land CSEM Simulations and Experimental Test Using Metallic Casing in a Geothermal Exploration Context: Vallès Basin (NE Spain) Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, Article ID: 4501813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Constable, S. (2010) Ten Years of Marine CSEM for Hydrocarbon Exploration. Geophysics, 75, 75A67-75A81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 底青云, 薛国强, 殷长春, 等. 中国人工源电磁探测新方法[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50(9): 1219-1227.
[4] Ayani, M., MacGregor, L. and Mallick, S. (2019) Inversion of Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetic Data Using a Parallel Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. Geophysical Journal International, 220, 1066-1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Cui, Y., Zhang, L., Zhu, X., Liu, J. and Guo, Z. (2020) Inversion for Magnetotelluric Data Using the Particle Swarm Optimization and Regularized Least Squares. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 181, Article ID: 104156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Yang, X., Liu, Y., Su, Y., Yin, C., Wang, L., Gao, Y., et al. (2024) An Efficient Bayesian Inference for Geo-Electromagnetic Data Inversion Based on Surrogate Modeling with Adaptive Sampling DNN. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62, Article ID: 5921817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Zhou, Y., Gross, L. and Codd, A. (2024) Inversion of 2D Magnetotelluric (MT) Data with Axial Anisotropy Using Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 226, Article ID: 105401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Grayver, A.V. and Bürg, M. (2014) Robust and Scalable 3D Geo-Electromagnetic Modelling Approach Using the Finite Element Method. Geophysical Journal International, 198, 110-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 彭荣华. 频率域可控源电磁法三维正反演研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2016.
[10] Egbert, G.D. and Kelbert, A. (2012) Computational Recipes for Electromagnetic Inverse Problems. Geophysical Journal International, 189, 251-267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Liu, J., Ren, Z., Xiao, X., Tang, J. and Lin, P. (2022) Accelerating the Frequency Domain Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Data Inversion Using Rational Krylov Subspace Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, Article ID: 4510412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Liu, J., Xiao, X., Tang, J., Zhou, C., Li, Y., Zhou, F., et al. (2024) 3D Structurally Constrained Inversion of the Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Data Using Octree Meshes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62, Article ID: 4509615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Commer, M. and Newman, G.A. (2008) New Advances in Three-Dimensional Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 172, 513-535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Avdeev, D. and Avdeeva, A. (2009) 3D Magnetotelluric Inversion Using a Limited-Memory Quasi-Newton Optimization. Geophysics, 74, F45-F57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Tikhonov, A.N., Arsenin, V.J., IAkovlevich, A.V., et al. (1977) Solutions of Illposed Problems. Vh Winston.
[16] 徐锦通, 汤井田. 基于谱元法的广域电磁法三维正演模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 2022, 65(4): 1461-1471.
[17] Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.J. (1999) Numerical Optimization. Springer.