道德信息对合作行为的影响——共同内群体认同的中介作用
The Impact of Moral Information on Cooperative Behavior—The Mediating Role of Common Ingroup Identity
摘要: 本研究采用群际狭隘与普遍合作范式(IPUC)，通过实验法探讨道德信息对合作行为的影响及其作用机制。结果发现：在嵌套社会困境中，积极的道德信息能够促进普遍合作，减少强狭隘合作。与此同时，积极道德信息还可以通过增强共同内群体认同促进普遍合作。本研究对于增进群际合作、实现互惠共赢具有一定的理论和实践价值。
Abstract: This study adopts the Intergroup Parochial and Universal Cooperation Paradigm (IPUC) to explore the impact and mechanism of moral information on cooperative behavior through experimental methods. The results showed that in nested social dilemmas, positive moral information can promote universal cooperation and reduce strong narrow cooperation. At the same time, moral information can also influence universal cooperation through common ingroup identity. This study has certain theoretical and practical value for enhancing intergroup cooperation and achieving mutual benefit and win-win outcomes.
文章引用：张百玫, 尹雪萍, 杨梦云, 王晓明 (2025). 道德信息对合作行为的影响——共同内群体认同的中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(7), 255-263. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.157426

参考文献

[1] 何宁, 王紫祎, 林嘉浩, 李梦, 游旭群(2025). 叙述性信息对狭隘合作行为的影响机制. 心理学报, 57(4), 513-525.
[2] 王俊秀, 周迎楠, 裴福华(2021). 社会心理服务体系建设视角下铸牢中华民族共同体意识的路径——基于共同内群体认同理论. 民族学刊, 12(5), 17-23, 108.
[3] 温芳芳, 佐斌(2018). 最简群体范式的操作、心理机制及新应用. 心理科学, 41(3), 713-719.
[4] 朱泓锦(2024). 嵌套社会困境中声誉类型和声誉效价对合作行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 济宁: 曲阜师范大学.
[5] Aaldering, H., & Böhm, R. (2019). Parochial versus Universal Cooperation: Introducing a Novel Economic Game of Within-and Between-Group Interaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 36-45.[CrossRef] 
[6] Aaldering, H., Ten Velden, F. S., van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2018). Parochial Cooperation in Nested Intergroup Dilemmas Is Reduced When It Harms Out-Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 909-923.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Abbink, K., & Harris, D. (2019). In-Group Favouritism and Out-Group Discrimination in Naturally Occurring Groups. PLOS ONE, 14, e0221616.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The Bigger One of the “Big Two”? Preferential Processing of Communal Information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935-948.[CrossRef] 
[9] Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the Importance of Being Moral: The Distinctive Role of Morality in Social Judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397-408.[CrossRef] 
[10] Brambilla, M., Hewstone, M., & Colucci, F. P. (2013a). Enhancing Moral Virtues: Increased Perceived Outgroup Morality as a Mediator of Intergroup Contact Effects. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 648-657.[CrossRef] 
[11] Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for Honesty: The Primary Role of Morality (vs. Sociability and Competence) in Information Gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143.[CrossRef] 
[12] Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Menegatti, M., & Moscatelli, S. (2016). Honesty and Dishonesty Don’t Move Together: Trait Content Information Influences Behavioral Synchrony. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 171-186.[CrossRef] 
[13] Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013b). Morality and Intergroup Relations: Threats to Safety and Group Image Predict the Desire to Interact with Outgroup and Ingroup Members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811-821.[CrossRef] 
[14] Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Goodwin, G. P. (2021). The Primacy of Morality in Impression Development: Theory, Research, and Future Directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 187-262.[CrossRef] 
[15] Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2012). You Want to Give a Good Impression? Be Honest! Moral Traits Dominate Group Impression Formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149-166.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Čehajić‐Clancy, S., Janković, A., Opačin, N., & Bilewicz, M. (2023). The Process of Becoming ‘We’ in an Intergroup Conflict Context: How Enhancing Intergroup Moral Similarities Leads to Common‐Ingroup Identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62, 1251-1270.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Choshen-Hillel, S., Shaw, A., & Caruso, E. M. (2020). Lying to Appear Honest. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 1719-1735.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived Intragroup Variability as a Function of Group Status and Identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.[CrossRef] 
[19] Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401-420.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014). Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Psychology Press.[CrossRef] 
[22] Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Moral Character in Person Perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 38-44.[CrossRef] 
[23] Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral Character Predominates in Person Perception and Evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148-168.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Hauke, N., & Abele, A. E. (2020). Two Faces of the Self: Actor-Self Perspective and Observer-Self Perspective Are Differentially Related to Agency versus Communion. Self and Identity, 19, 346-368.[CrossRef] 
[25] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. The Guilford Press.
[26] Israel, S., Weisel, O., Ebstein, R. P., & Bornstein, G. (2012). Oxytocin, but Not Vasopressin, Increases Both Parochial and Universal Altruism. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 1341-1344.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B. et al. (2008). Group-Level Self-Definition and Self-Investment: A Hierarchical (Multicomponent) Model of In-Group Identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Leidner, B., & Castano, E. (2012). Morality Shifting in the Context of Intergroup Violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 82-91.[CrossRef] 
[29] Munniksma, A., Verkuyten, M., Flache, A., Stark, T. H., & Veenstra, R. (2015). Friendships and Outgroup Attitudes among Ethnic Minority Youth: The Mediating Role of Ethnic and Host Society Identification. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 88-99.[CrossRef] 
[30] Pagliaro, S., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M., & Di Cesare, C. (2016). Once Dishonest, Always Dishonest? The Impact of Perceived Pervasiveness of Moral Evaluations of the Self on Motivation to Restore a Moral Reputation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 586.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.[CrossRef] 
[32] SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., & Moran, S. (2022). The Primacy of Honest Reputations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, Article ID: 101398.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Simon, J. C., & Gutsell, J. N. (2019). Effects of Minimal Grouping on Implicit Prejudice, Infrahumanization, and Neural Processing Despite Orthogonal Social Categorizations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23, 323-343.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Tajfel, H. (1978). Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison. Academic Press.
[35] Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Kim, A. (2017). She’s Not One of Us: Group Membership Moderates the Effect of Fertility Cues on Attractiveness Ratings. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 689-697.[CrossRef] 
[36] Wit, A. P., & Kerr, N. L. (2002). “Me versus Just Us versus Us All” Categorization and Cooperation in Nested Social Dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 616-637.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and Competence in Person-and Self-Perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.[CrossRef]