基于信赖原则的过失认定及其刑法展开
Determination of Negligence Based on the Principle of Reliance and Its Development in Criminal Law
摘要: 随着社会的发展、科技的进步,越来越多的新行业产生,它们在为社会发展和人类生活带来益处的同时,也带来了从前未曾有过的危险。为了中和科技发展带来的极大便利和更多危险,更好地兼顾推动社会发展和保护人们的利益,信赖原则应势而生。信赖原则起源于德国的交通领域,后被更多的国家和地区所接受,也逐渐扩展到更多的高风险行业。信赖原则通过事前规定各参与人的注意义务来进行危险分配,从而更好地进行事后的归责,在过失犯罪的认定中发挥着重要作用。本文从信赖原则的概念和产生条件出发,阐明与其相关的基础理论,在此基础上,说明信赖原则与过失犯罪各理论的关系,重点阐述信赖原则在认定过失犯罪中的实施模式,最后,对信赖原则在我国的交通领域、医疗过失领域和监督过失领域中的适用可能性进行分析,以期为我国借鉴和引入信赖原则提供些许启示。
Abstract: With the development of society and the advancement of technology, more and more new industries are emerging, which not only bring benefits to social development and human life, but also bring unprecedented risks. In order to neutralize the great convenience and more risks brought by technological development, and better balance the promotion of social development and the protection of people’s interests, the principle of trust has emerged. The principle of trust originated in the transportation field of Germany and was later accepted by more countries and regions, gradually expanding to more high-risk industries. The principle of trust allocates danger by pre specifying the duty of care of each participant, thereby better assigning responsibility afterwards and playing an important role in the determination of negligent crimes. This article starts from the concept and conditions of the principle of trust, elucidates its related basic theories, and on this basis, explains the relationship between the principle of trust and various theories of negligent crime. It focuses on the implementation mode of the principle of trust in identifying negligent crime. Finally, it analyzes the possibility of the application of the principle of trust in the fields of transportation, medical negligence, and supervisory negligence in China, to provide some inspiration for China to learn from and introduce the principle of trust.
文章引用:张若轩. 基于信赖原则的过失认定及其刑法展开[J]. 法学, 2025, 13(7): 1565-1571. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2025.137218

参考文献

[1] 川端博. 刑法总论二十五讲[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003: 129.
[2] 周光权. 注意义务研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 150.
[3] 柯武刚, 史漫飞. 制度经济学: 社会秩序与公共政策[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2000.
[4] [日]大谷实. 刑法总论[M]. 黎宏, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 148.
[5] 高铭暄. 过失犯罪的基础理论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002: 11.
[6] [台]余振华. 刑法违法性理论[M]. 台北: 元照出版有限公司, 2001: 81-83.
[7] 洪福增. 刑事责任之理论[M]. 台北: 刑事法杂志社, 1988: 360.
[8] [日]西原春夫. 交通事故与信赖原则[M]. 东京: 成文堂, 1969: 20.
[9] [日]甲斐克则. 过失犯的基础理论[M]//高铭暄, 赵秉志. 过失犯罪的基础理论. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002: 11.
[10] 苏惠渔. 现实与理念之间——过失交通犯罪研究[M]//高铭暄, 赵秉志. 过失犯罪的基础理论. 北京: 法律出版社, 2002: 58-59.
[11] 游伟, 谢锡美. 信赖原则及其在过失犯罪中的运用[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2001(5): 56-65.
[12] 臧冬斌. 医疗犯罪比较研究(刑法分册比较研究丛书) [M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2005: 109.
[13] 马克昌. 比较刑法原理: 外国刑法学总论[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2002: 269.