应对生成式人工智能挑战：学术写作合规性框架与合法性边界界定
Addressing Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Compliance Framework and Legal Boundaries Demarcation in Academic Writing
摘要: 随着AIGC技术的迅猛发展，其在学术写作中的应用日益广泛，既为个体进行学术写作提升带来了机遇，也引发了不当署名、学术剽窃，学术伪造和篡改等一系列学术不端的挑战，有必要探寻生成性人工智能在学术写作中运用的合法边界，对超出合法边界的行为进行认定和处理。本研究为规范AIGC在学术写作领域的合理应用、促进学术诚信体系建设提供了理论依据与实践指引。
Abstract: With the rapid development of AIGC technology, its application in academic writing has become increasingly widespread. This has not only brought opportunities for individuals to enhance their academic writing capabilities but also triggered a series of challenges related to academic misconduct, such as improper authorship, academic plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification. It is necessary to explore the legal boundaries of using generative artificial intelligence in academic writing, and to identify and address behaviors that exceed these boundaries. This study provides theoretical foundations and practical guidance for regulating the rational application of AIGC in the field of academic writing and promoting the construction of an academic integrity system.
文章引用：王书凡. 应对生成式人工智能挑战：学术写作合规性框架与合法性边界界定[J]. 法学, 2025, 13(7): 1583-1590. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2025.137221

参考文献

[1] 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法[EB/OL]. 2023-07-10.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202307/content_6891752.htm, 2024-07-15.
[2] Chan, C.K.Y. (2023) A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article No. 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Thorp, H.H. (2023) ChatGPT Is Fun, But Not an Author. Science, 379, 313-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 负责任研究行为规范指引(2023) [EB/OL]. 2024-06-19.
https://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/202312/t20231221_189240.html, 2025-04-17.
[5] Eacersall, D., Pretorius, L., Smirnov, I., et al. (2024) Navigating Ethical Challenges in Generative AI-Enhanced Research: The Ethical Framework for Responsible Generative AI Use.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09021
[6] Bjelobaba, S., et al. (2024) Research Integrity and GenAI: A Systematic Analysis of Ethical Challenges Across Research Phases.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10134
[7] Lo, C.K. (2023) What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13, Article 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Rahman, M., Terano, H.J.R., Rahman, N., Salamzadeh, A. and Rahaman, S. (2023) ChatGPT and Academic Research: A Review and Recommendations Based on Practical Examples. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 3, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., et al. (2020) Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
[10] 黄锫. 生成式AI对个人信息保护的挑战与风险规制[J]. 现代法学, 2024, 46(4): 101-115.
[11] 韩博. ChatGPT引发的人工智能内容生产传播风险[J]. 中国社会科学报, 2023(6): 34-36.
[12] 贾开, 蒋余浩. 人工智能治理的三个基本问题: 技术逻辑、风险挑战与公共政策选择[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(10): 40-45.
[13] 赵磊磊, 吴小凡, 赵可云. 责任伦理: 教育人工智能风险治理的时代诉求[J]. 电化教育研究, 2022, 43(6): 32-38.

为你推荐