Windows 11系统可用性评估与用户满意度分析
Usability Evaluation and User Satisfaction Analysis of Windows 11 System
DOI: 10.12677/isl.2025.94073, PDF,   
作者: 葛 缨*, 季嘉尧*:重庆文理学院,重庆市情绪与心理健康重点实验室,暨用户体验与人机交互技术联合研究所,重庆;刘 杰#:重庆第二师范学院教师教育学院,暨西部儿童脑与认知科学研究院,重庆;庞惠珊:西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,四川 成都
关键词: Windows 11系统用户体验系统可用性满意度分析Windows 11 System User Experience System Usability Satisfaction Analysis
摘要: Windows 11系统作为WIN系列最新操作系统,在带来新体验的同时,也引发了用户各类使用问题。目的:验证国际经典量表CSUQ、ASQ、QUIS在国内的适用性,探究Windows 11系统的可用性和用户满意度现状。方法:通过收集量表数据检验三个量表的国内适用性,采用量表法获取用户的使用现状并进行分析。结果:CSUQ、ASQ、QUIS三个量表均表现出良好的本土适用性(高低分组差异显著、球形检验显著、内部一致性高、效标关联效度显著等);用户对Windows 11系统总体满意度较高,不同性别在Windows 11系统的可用性和满意度评价上不存在显著性差异、职业与专业在Windows 11系统的可用性和满意度评价上具有交互效应、不同电脑类型在Windows 11系统的可用性和满意度评价上存在显著差异。结论:国际经典量表CUSQ、ASQ、QUIS在国内具有较高的文化适用性,其中不同性别在评价上不存在显著性差异、职业与专业在评价上具有交互效应、不同电脑类型在评价上存在显著差异。
Abstract: As the latest operating system in the Windows series, Windows 11 has introduced new user experiences while also giving rise to various user issues during usage. Purpose: To validate the applicability of internationally recognized scales CSUQ, ASQ, and QUIS in the Chinese context, and to explore the current status of Windows 11’s usability and user satisfaction. Method: The applicability of the three scales in the domestic context was examined by collecting scale data. The scale method was employed to obtain and analyze users’ current usage status. Results: All three scales (CSUQ, ASQ, and QUIS) demonstrated good local applicability (e.g., significant differences between high and low score groups, significant sphericity test results, high internal consistency, and significant criterion-related validity). Users showed relatively high overall satisfaction with Windows 11. No significant differences were found between genders in evaluations of Windows 11's usability and satisfaction; there was an interaction effect between occupation and major in these evaluations; and significant differences were observed across different computer types in such evaluations. Conclusion: The internationally classical scales CSUQ, ASQ, and QUIS exhibit high cultural applicability in the Chinese context. Specifically, no significant gender differences exist in evaluations; occupation and major have an interaction effect on evaluations; and significant differences are present across different computer types in evaluations.
文章引用:葛缨, 季嘉尧, 刘杰, 庞惠珊. Windows 11系统可用性评估与用户满意度分析[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2025, 9(4): 582-600. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2025.94073

参考文献

[1] 刘克涛. 基于用户体验度量的人机交互界面可用性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2018.
[2] 由芳, 王建民. 可用性测试[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2017.
[3] 王宇晖. 系统可用性量表在感知可用性纵向研究中的改进和应用[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
[4] Brooke, J. (1996) SUS-A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B. and Weerdmeester, B., Eds., Usability Evaluation in Industry, Taylor & Francis, 4-9.
[5] Lewis, J.R. (2002) Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 463-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 赵宇晴, 阮平南, 刘晓燕, 等. 基于在线评论的用户满意度评价研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(3): 179-189.
[7] 黄坚平, 李晋明. 用户满意理念及用户满意度指数在中国的应用[J]. 北京商学院学报, 2000(5): 60-63.
[8] Lewis, J.R. (1995) IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 57-78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Chin J.P. and Diehl, V.A. (1988) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery.
[10] Lewis, J.R. (2018) The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34, 577-590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Wang, Y., Lei, T. and Liu, X. (2019) Chinese System Usability Scale: Translation, Revision, Psychological Measurement. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36, 953-963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 兰国帅, 钟秋菊, 吕彩杰, 等. 探究社区量表中文版的编制——基于探索性和验证性因素分析[J]. 开放教育研究, 2018, 24(3): 68-76.
[13] Napitupulu, D., Abdel Kadar, J. and Kartika Jati, R. (2017) Validity Testing of Technology Acceptance Model Based on Factor Analysis Approach. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 5, 697-704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 杨强, 叶宝娟, 温忠麟. 用SPSS软件计算单维测验的合成信度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(3): 496-498.
[15] Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Bartholomew, D.J. and Knott, M. (1999) Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 120-125.
[17] Byrne, B.M. (1998) Structural Equation Modeling with LIS-REL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, 827-830.
[18] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 张颖. 大学生计算机焦虑及其相关因素的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2008.
[20] 汪雨薇, 程垫丰. 浅议办公室行政文员的工作特点[J]. 丝路视野, 2018(11): 51.
[21] 姚杰, 魏巍. 顾客重购意愿的品牌资产维度研究——以笔记本电脑行业为例[J]. 产业经济研究, 2009(4): 61-65, 94.