自由选择与创世决断——论萨特与谢林间的一种可能联系
Free Choice and Creative Decision—On a Possible Connection between Sartre and Schelling
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2025.148414, PDF,   
作者: 杨 凯:云南大学政府管理学院,云南 昆明
关键词: 谢林萨特世界时代自由虚无Schelling Sartre Ages of the World Freedom Nothingness
摘要: 萨特与德国观念论的密切关联已经广为人知,但是这种关联通常被指向黑格尔,至于他与谢林的关系则尚未得到充分彰显,而本文尝试从自由问题入手探究此关系。概言之,谢林在《自由论文》和《世界时代》中通过揭示绝对者内部不一致性阐发了一种以质料为基础的新的自由观,萨特尽管并未直接领受谢林后期的思想,但在其生存论中也有类似的自由观,因为其所谓有限者的“自由选择”实际上可以对应于谢林意义上的“创世决断”,但在有限性的立场上走得更彻底,最终取消了绝对者的地位。
Abstract: As for the relationship between Sartre and German idealism, his relationship with Hegel has been widely discussed, while his relationship with Schelling has not been highlighted. This paper tries to clarify the transition from German idealism to post-idealism by revealing the relationship between Sartre and Schelling from the perspective of freedom. In a word, Schelling’s investigation of the internal inconsistency of the absolute in his “Freedom Essay” and his manuscripts in “Ages of the World” opened up a new conception of freedom based on material, which profoundly influenced the philosophy of the post-idealist era. Although Sartre did not directly accept Schelling’s philosophy in the later period, he also had a very similar view of freedom in his existentialism. “Creative decision” in Schelling’s sense corresponds to the “Free choice” of the finite in Sartre’s sense, but Sartre goes further in the position of finiteness and even rejects the absolute directly.
文章引用:杨凯. 自由选择与创世决断——论萨特与谢林间的一种可能联系[J]. 哲学进展, 2025, 14(8): 70-77. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2025.148414

参考文献

[1] (德)海德格尔. 谢林论人类自由的本质[M]. 薛华: 译. 沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社, 1999.
[2] Bowie, A. (1933) Schelling and Modern European Philosophy: An Introduction. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 谢地坤. 绝对与人类自由—谢林《自由论》探析[J]. 现代哲学, 2004(1): 67-74.
[4] (德)谢林. 论人类自由的本质及相关对象[M]. 先刚: 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019.
[5] Thomas, M/J. (2020) A True Proteus: Non-Being in Schelling’s Ages of the World. In: Hühn, L., Höfele, P. and Schwab, P., Eds.), Zeit-Geschichte-Erzählung: F.W.J. Schellings Weltalter, Verlag Karl Alber.
[6] Oesterreich, P.L. (1985) Schellings Weltalter und die ausstehende Vollendung des deutschen Idealismus. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 39, 70-85.
[7] (德)谢林. 世界时代[M]. 先刚, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.
[8] 劳赫∙胡恩. 海德格尔与谢林的哲学对话[J]. 社会科学家, 2017(12): 27-33.
[9] (斯)齐泽克. 自由的深渊[M]. 王俊, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2013: 27.
[10] 庄振华. 自由、形式与真理——黑格尔与谢林的自由观探析[J]. 哲学动态, 2019(1): 94-102.
[11] (德)胡塞尔. 笛卡尔式的沉思[M]. 张廷国, 译. 北京: 中国城市出版社, 2002: 55.
[12] (法)萨特. 自我的超越性[M]. 杜小真, 译. 上海: 商务印书馆, 2010.
[13] (德)海德格尔. 存在与时间[M]. 陈嘉映, 王庆节, 译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 2014: 213.
[14] (法)萨特. 存在与虚无[M]. 杜小真, 译. 北京: 生活∙读书∙新知三联书店, 2014.
[15] 屈明珍. 萨特自由观的现象学奠基[J]. 哲学动态, 2016(8): 55-60.
[16] Sartre, J.P. (1992) Notebooks for an Ethics (Translated by Pellauer, D.). University of Chicago Press, 34.
[17] (法)萨特. 存在主义是一种人道主义[M]. 周煦良, 汤永宽, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2005: 32.
[18] Tillich, P. (1955) Schelling und die Anfänge des existentialistischen Protestes. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 9, 197-208.
[19] Gardner, S. (2006) Sartre, Schelling, and Onto-Theology. Religious Studies, 42, 247-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] (德)瓦尔特∙舒尔茨. 德国观念论的终结[M]. 韩隽, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 372.