南昌城市内湖夏季浮游植物群落分布及叶绿素荧光特征
Distribution of Phytoplankton Communities and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics in Urban Lakes of Nanchang in Summer
摘要: 目的:旨在探讨夏季城市内湖水华形成过程中浮游植物群落结构及其光合生理响应特征,揭示水华形成的光合机制,为城市湖泊藻华的监测与防控提供科学依据。方法:本研究以南昌市黄家湖不同水深为对象,采用分层采样技术,并结合显微镜定量分析与PHYTO-PAM原位叶绿素荧光测定,解析浮游植物群落结构与叶绿素荧光参数的响应规律。结果:研究表明:(1) 夏季水华期共鉴定浮游植物36种,以蓝藻(Microcystis sp., Anabaena sp., Oscillatoria等)和绿藻(Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp.)为优势种。群落的香农指数由非水华期的2.23显著下降至1.88,蓝藻丰度显著增加38.06% (其中微囊藻占比36.71%),但生物量减少75.56%,群落多样性明显降低。(2) 水华群落的光合最大效率Fv/Fm值(0.149)显著低于非水华期(0.423),其中蓝藻表现出更高的光耐受力(Fv/Fm = 0.321),远高于硅藻(Fv/Fm = 0.126);(3) 快速光响应曲线显示水华藻类的光适应参数α及电子传递速率最大值rETRmax分别下降39.78%和62.79%,但随水深增加逐步恢复的趋势。结论:蓝藻凭借更强的光合生理适应性,成为夏季城市湖泊水华的主导生物;而过强的光抑制效应则显著降低群落的光合效率,增加表层水体的生态风险。
Abstract: Objective: The aim is to explore the structure of phytoplankton communities and their photosynthetic physiological response characteristics during the formation process of summer urban lake blooms, revealing the photosynthetic mechanisms behind bloom formation, and providing a scientific basis for monitoring and controlling algal blooms in urban lakes. Methods: This study focused on different water depths of Huangjia Lake in Nanchang City, using a stratified sampling technique combined with quantitative analysis under a microscope and in situ chlorophyll fluorescence measurement with PHYTO-PAM to analyze the response patterns of phytoplankton community structure and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Results: The study shows that: (1) A total of 36 phytoplankton species were identified during the summer bloom period, with cyanobacteria (Microcystis sp., Anabaena sp., Oscillatoria, etc.) and green algae (Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp.) being the dominant species. The Shannon index of the community significantly decreased from 2.23 during non-bloom periods to 1.88, with cyanobacteria abundance significantly increasing by 38.06% (of which Microcystis accounted for 36.71%), but biomass decreased by 75.56%, leading to a noticeable decline in community diversity. (2) The maximum photosynthetic efficiency Fv/Fm of the bloom community (0.149) was significantly lower than that during non-bloom periods (0.423), with cyanobacteria exhibiting higher light tolerance (Fv/Fm = 0.321), far exceeding diatoms (Fv/Fm = 0.126); (3) Rapid light response curves showed that the light adaptation parameters α and the maximum electron transport rate rETRmax of blooming algae decreased by 39.78% and 62.79%, respectively, but showed a recovery trend with increasing water depth. Conclusion: Cyanobacteria, with stronger photosynthetic physiological adaptability, become the dominant organisms of urban lake blooms in summer; while the excessively strong light inhibition effect significantly reduces the community’s photosynthetic efficiency, increasing the ecological risk of surface water.
文章引用:王丽艳, 黄文超, 王华, 骆昱春, 万剑飚. 南昌城市内湖夏季浮游植物群落分布及叶绿素荧光特征[J]. 世界生态学, 2025, 14(3): 182-191. https://doi.org/10.12677/ije.2025.143023

参考文献

[1] Islam, M. and Beardall, J. (2017) Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Toxic and Non-Toxic Strains of the Cyanobacteria Microcystis Aeruginosa and Anabaena Circinalis in Relation to Light. Microorganisms, 5, Article 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Kazmi, S.S.U.H., Yapa, N., Karunarathna, S.C. and Suwannarach, N. (2022) Perceived Intensification in Harmful Algal Blooms Is a Wave of Cumulative Threat to the Aquatic Ecosystems. Biology, 11, Article 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Guislain, A., Beisner, B.E. and Köhler, J. (2018) Variation in Species Light Acquisition Traits under Fluctuating Light Regimes: Implications for Non‐Equilibrium Coexistence. Oikos, 128, 716-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Wu, H., Wu, X., Rovelli, L. and Lorke, A. (2024) Selection of Photosynthetic Traits by Turbulent Mixing Governs Formation of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Shallow Eutrophic Lakes. The ISME Journal, 18, wrae021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Nazari Sharabian, M., Ahmad, S. and Karakouzian, M. (2018) Climate Change and Eutrophication: A Short Review. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 8, 3668-3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 杨芷萱, 黎云祥, 朱广伟, 等. 2003-2023年太湖蓝藻水华面积变化的影响因子分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2025, 37(3): 734-751.
[7] 华兆晖, 李锐, 杨智, 等. 2017-2022年洱海水体营养状态的时空变化趋势及其成因分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2024, 36(6): 1639-1649.
[8] 许可. 不同氮磷浓度对普通小球藻生长及光合作用的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2018.
[9] 郑传坤, 刘晓真, 李卫国, 等. 不同氮素对冠盘藻生长和光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2022, 44(1): 1674-3075.
[10] 王小冬, 刘兴国, 陆诗敏, 等. 不同浓度蓝藻水华在好氧条件下的光合作用[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(8): 3412-3419.
[11] 王小冬, 刘子秋, 刘兴国, 等. 不同浓度微囊藻水华在曝气扰动下的光合作用[J]. 环境科学技术, 2021, 44(12): 136-144.
[12] 顾晓妍, 杨昌涛, 崔志杰, 等. 不同营养条件下铜锈环棱螺对假鱼腥藻生长及光合活性的抑制作用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(6): 425-435.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1843.X.20250320.1314.004
[13] 石雨鑫, 汤春宇, 谭梦, 等. 常见入侵植物水提液对水华藻生长及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2020, 36(2): 101-107.
[14] 李嘉仪. 东张水库浮游植物群落特征及水体富营养化评价[J]. 海峡科学, 2024(7): 53-57.
[15] 陈丽光. 古田水库浮游生物群落结构特征分析及其生物控藻技术探讨[J]. 海峡科学, 2024(8): 83-86.
[16] 陈静. 光谱结构和波动光强对铜绿微囊藻的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2023.
[17] 董向前, 袁宇翔, 路永正, 等. 光照与浮游动物耦合作用对浮游植物群落的影响——以小兴凯湖为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(2): 227-235.
[18] 戴兴露. 光质对铜绿微囊藻的光合生理及营养吸收的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2022.
[19] 王玉婷. 过氧化钙治理蓝藻水华的作用机制与生态效应研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2024.
[20] 刘泽碧, 毛旭锋, 吴艺, 等. 海湖湿地水体蓝藻水华期浮游生物群落特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(6): 946-957.
[21] 牛漾聃, 黄清辉, 沈小兵, 等. 金鱼藻与环棱螺对铜绿微囊藻生长及光合活性的抑制作用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(7): 299-309.
[22] 王俊涛. 近20年全球浮游植物物候时空变化及环境气候影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2021.
[23] 吴铭杰, 许海, 詹旭蓝, 等. 藻生长与衰亡对太湖沉积物-上覆水系统CO2和CH4排放通量的影响及其来源途径[J]. 湖泊科学, 2025, 37(2): 401-414.
[24] 张玉晴, 刘佳音, 蔡元锋, 等. 蓝藻-细菌互作及其对碳、氮循环的影响研究进展[J]. 湖泊科学, 2025, 37(2): 339-353.
[25] 姚学杏. 澎溪河水华季浮游植物群落结构及其对水环境的响应[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2024.
[26] 郭咏琪, 孟晗, 邓代兰, 等. 气候变暖对微囊藻的生长、代谢及机制研究进展[J]. 环境生态学, 2023, 5(7): 79-86.
[27] 许珍, 殷大聪, 陈进, 等. 温度和光强对4种常见水华藻叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(6): 39-44.
[28] 李大命, 张彤晴, 唐晟凯, 等. 太湖微囊藻光合作用活性的周年动态变化. 环境科学学报[J], 2016, 36(8): 3066-3072.
[29] Borics, G., Abonyi, A., Salmaso, N. and Ptacnik, R. (2020) Freshwater Phytoplankton Diversity: Models, Drivers and Implications for Ecosystem Properties. Hydrobiologia, 848, 53-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]