华东地区绿色物流效率评价研究——基于SBM超效率及ML指数
Research on the Efficiency Evaluation of Green Logistics in East China—Based on SBM Super-Efficiency and ML Index
摘要: 基于华东六省一市2010~2022年的面板数据,本研究测度了考虑能源消耗与碳排放约束下的区域绿色物流效率。超效率SBM模型用于评估静态效率水平及其时空分异特征,ML指数则用于分解全要素生产率变动,探究效率动态演进的内在动力。结果表明:静态效率呈现显著梯度分化,上海长期处于领先地位,江苏、安徽构成第二梯队,福建、浙江、山东、江西效率相对较低,且驱动模式各异。动态演进呈现三阶段特征:2010~2015年波动调整期、2016~2019年技术转型期、2020~2022年韧性重构期。技术进步(TC)是推动华东地区绿色物流效率增长的核心驱动力,普遍高于技术效率(EC)的贡献。疫情冲击下虽导致技术效率显著下滑,但技术进步逆势增长,成为支撑效率快速恢复的关键韧性因素。
Abstract: Based on the panel data of six provinces and one municipality in East China from 2010 to 2022, this study measures the regional green logistics efficiency under the constraints of energy consumption and carbon emissions. The super-efficiency SBM model is used to evaluate the static efficiency level and its spatio-temporal differentiation characteristics, while the ML index is employed to decompose the changes in total factor productivity and explore the internal driving forces of efficiency dynamic evolution. The results show that the static efficiency presents a significant gradient differentiation. Shanghai has been in an absolute leading position for a long time, Jiangsu and Anhui form the second tier, and Fujian, Zhejiang, Shandong, and Jiangxi have relatively lower efficiency, with different driving modes. The dynamic evolution shows three-stage characteristics: the fluctuation adjustment period from 2010 to 2015, the technology dividend period from 2016 to 2019, and the resilience reconstruction period from 2020 to 2022. Technological progress (TC) is the core driving force for the growth of green logistics efficiency in East China, generally contributing more than technical efficiency (EC). Although the technological efficiency significantly declined under the impact of the epidemic, technological progress increased against the trend, becoming a key resilient factor supporting the rapid recovery of efficiency.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Markovits-Somogyi, R. and Bokor, Z. (2014) Assessing the Logistics Efficiency of European Countries by Using the DEA-PC Methodology. Transport, 29, 137-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
刘华军, 郭立祥, 乔列成, 石印. 中国物流业效率的时空格局及动态演进[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(5): 57-74.
|
|
[3]
|
毕延超. 中国区域绿色物流效率评价及影响因素分析[J]. 福建金融管理干部学院学报, 2024(1): 65-74.
|
|
[4]
|
刘小兰, 朱颖. 中国物流业绿色发展效率时空演化及因素分解研究[J]. 中国市场, 2023(25): 168-172.
|
|
[5]
|
Liu, J., Li, S. and Ji, Q. (2021) Regional Differences and Driving Factors Analysis of Carbon Emission Intensity from Transport Sector in China. Energy, 224, Article ID: 120178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
武佩剑, 薛建涛, 朱岚岚. 中国绿色物流效率评价与提升路径研究[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(6): 10-21.
|
|
[7]
|
何景师, 王术峰, 徐兰. 碳排放约束下我国三大湾区城市群绿色物流效率及影响因素研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2021, 43(8): 30-36.
|
|
[8]
|
薛阳, 李曼竹, 王健康, 等. 黄河流域九省区绿色物流效率评价研究——基于三阶段DEA模型[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2022, 47(2): 67-72.
|
|
[9]
|
原雅坤. “碳约束”下黄河流域物流效率影响分析[J]. 中国航务周刊, 2024(25): 60-63.
|
|
[10]
|
徐超毅, 齐豫. 我国区域物流业绿色发展效率测度和空间分析——以华东地区为例[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(4): 81-88.
|
|
[11]
|
刘宇, 黄玉桂, 张思宇, 等. 江西省物流效率时空变迁研究[J]. 江西理工大学学报, 2024, 45(5): 59-66.
|
|
[12]
|
刘盼盼. 基于DEA模型云南物流效率评价及对策研究[J]. 中国物流与采购, 2022(16): 75-76.
|
|
[13]
|
李卫忠, 李星星. 环境规制下广东省物流业绿色技术效率实证研究[J]. 五邑大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(3): 57-62, 93-94.
|
|
[14]
|
张永胜. 区域物流效率评价及其影响因素分析——基于广西地区的实证数据[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022(12): 111-114.
|