湖南省4 * 4现代产业体系的减税政策效果评估——以工程机械制造行业为例
Evaluation on the Effect of Tax Reduction Policy of 4 * 4 Modern Industrial System in Hunan Province—Taking Construction Machinery Manufacturing Industry as an Example
摘要: 2016~2023年我国出台了一系列企业减税政策,本文以湖南省工程机械制造行业85家规模以上企业及重点税源企业为样本,基于企业的财务数据对2016~2023年减税效果进行评估。结果显示,总体税负逐年下降,有效降低了企业的实际税负,2019和2022年的减税效果比2017年和2018年显著,湖南省规模以上制造业营收规模与利润总额双增长,但营业税金及附加维持原水平,由此可以得出制造业中工程机械行业所得税负担高于制造业产业整体负担,企业研发费用加计扣除比例提升,使工程机械行业税费负担率降幅明显。本文对政策效果进行综合分析后,提出了进一步优化方向,借助政策红利“税负优化”驱动湖南省工程机械行业数字化转型,通过“一返双稳一升”凸显减税政策“精准滴灌”效应,增强行业抗风险能力,完善政策组合及评估体系,研发费用加计扣除等政策的“激励传导效应”也不容忽视。
Abstract: China issued a series of tax reduction policies for enterprises from 2016 to 2023. This paper takes 85 Enterprises above Designated Size and key tax source enterprises in the construction machinery manufacturing industry in Hunan Province as samples, and evaluates the tax reduction effect from 2016 to 2023 based on the financial data of enterprises. The results show that the overall tax burden has decreased year by year, effectively reducing the actual tax burden of enterprises. The tax reduction effect in 2019 and 2022 is more significant than that in 2017 and 2018. The revenue scale and total profit of manufacturing above Designated Size in Hunan Province have increased, but the business tax and surcharges have maintained the original level. From this, it can be concluded that the income tax burden of the construction machinery industry in the manufacturing industry is higher than the overall burden of the manufacturing industry, and the proportion of enterprise R&D expenses plus deduction has increased, which has significantly reduced the tax burden rate of the construction machinery industry. After a comprehensive analysis of the policy effect, this paper puts forward the direction of further optimization. The digital transformation of Hunan Construction machinery industry is driven by the “tax burden optimization” of the policy dividend. The “precision drip irrigation” effect of the tax reduction policy is highlighted through “one return, two stabilities and one rise”, which enhances the industry’s ability to resist risks, improves the policy portfolio and evaluation system, and the “incentive transmission effect” of policies such as R&D expenses plus deduction can not be ignored.
文章引用:向彬艳, 周永霞, 吴秀敏, 谢晴, 邹幸. 湖南省4 * 4现代产业体系的减税政策效果评估——以工程机械制造行业为例[J]. 世界经济探索, 2025, 14(4): 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12677/wer.2025.144056

参考文献

[1] 姜明耀. 现代产业体系视角下的增值税改革[J]. 税务研究, 2022(5): 33-39.
[2] Bai, C., Li, Q. and Ouyang, M. (2021) Tax Incentives and Corporate Restructuring: Evidence from China’s VAT Reform. Journal of Development Economics, 153, Article ID: 102715.
[3] 冯俏彬. 论建设现代产业体系的基础制度建设与税改策略[J]. 税务研究, 2018(2): 23-28.
[4] 姚东旻, 王艺霏, 褚昱辰. 我国的产业税负结构与现代产业体系建设路径——基于社会网络分析的特征事实[J]. 税务研究, 2023(11): 13-22.
[5] 李旭红, 杨武, 陈晶晶. 小微企业普惠性减税政策效应分析[J]. 国际税收, 2020(7): 52-61.
[6] 吴辉航. 微观企业税负与企业价值关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南财经大学, 2015.
[7] 杨青, 胡洋, 孙刚, 等. 如何协调减税降费与去杠杆?——基于地方 政府行为的视角[J]. 财经论丛, 2022(2): 15-25.
[8] 中国财科院“企业成本”调研“税费政策”专题组, 邢丽, 梁季, 等. 2022年新的组合式税费支持政策: 成效与优化[J]. 财政科学, 2023(4): 33-49.
[9] Maffini, G., Jing X. and Devereux M.P. (2016) The Impact of Investment Incentives: Evidence from UK Corporation Tax Returns. Oxford University: Center for Business Taxation.
[10] 홍찬표 (2019) The Effects of High Debt/Asset Ratio and the Choice of Accounting Method on the Investment Efficiency in Public Companies. The Journal of Korean Business Research, 3, 31-56.
[11] Jorgenson, D.W. (1963) Capital Theory and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review, 53, 247-259.
[12] 谭茜, 陈丽丽. 新一轮增值税减税政策效果评价分析: 以制造业为例[J]. 纳税, 2020, 14(7): 5-6.
[13] 龚辉文. 后金融危机时代世界税收政策比较研究[M]. 北京: 中国税务出版社, 2012.
[14] 谢艳. 我国“减税降费”政策效应研究[J]. 区域金融研究, 2020(10): 63-69.
[15] 李亚杰, 杨芷. 政府补助、研发投资与企业技术创新——基于装备制造业数据的分析[J]. 地方财政研究, 2019, 180(10): 87-95.
[16] 袁育婷, 杨水清. 中美制造业税负比较及降低中国制造业税负措施研究[J]. 海外投资与出口信贷, 2019(1): 30-33.
[17] 徐伟. 制造业减税降费的效应、问题及建议——以B市为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2021.
[18] 周燕春. 减税降费与深化增值税改革[J]. 中国财政, 2019(8): 64-65.
[19] 邓力平, 何巧, 王智烜. 减税降费背景下企业税负对创新的影响研究[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2020, 36(6): 101-111.