受害人承诺的实证法解释困境及其化解
The Dilemma of Positive Law Interpretation of Victim’s Consent and Its Resolution
摘要: 对于受害人承诺在我国《民法典》中的实现应当考虑两个方面的问题:在合同规范领域,需要通过对受害人承诺的授权性解释规避免责条款限制规定的规范范围;在侵权法领域,需要在对于过错的实质性判断中通过有限度地引入主观违法阻却事由实现受害人承诺的法理,从而实现受害人承诺这一超法规免责事由与现行《民法典》体系的协调解释。
Abstract: The implementation of victim’s consent in China’s “Civil Code” should consider two key issues: In the field of contract norms, it is necessary to restrict the normative scope of exemption clauses through an authorized interpretation of victim’s consent. In the field of tort law, the legal principle of victim’s consent should be realized by moderately introducing subjective grounds for negating wrongfulness in the substantive judgment of fault, thereby achieving a harmonious interpretation between victim’s consent as an extra-legal exemption and the current system of the “Civil Code”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王利明. 侵权责任法研究: 上卷[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2019: 466-467.
|
|
[2]
|
Mezger, E. (1924) Die subjektiven Unrechtselemente. Der Gerichtssaal, 89, 207-208.
|
|
[3]
|
Robert, V.H. (1930) En Deutsches Strafrecht, Tomo II. Allgemeine Lehren, 243.
|
|
[4]
|
Bianca, M. (2009) Diritto Civile, volum 5. Milano, Giuffrè, 679-681.
|
|
[5]
|
魏超. 论推定同意的正当化依据及范围: 以“无知之幕”为切入点[J]. 清华法学, 2019(2): 194-208.
|
|
[6]
|
柳经纬, 周宇. 侵权责任构成中违法性和过错的再认识[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2021(2): 135-144.
|
|
[7]
|
Staudinger/Schilken (2004) Vorbem. zu§§164ff. Rn. 34.
|
|
[8]
|
孙宪忠. 再谈物权行为理论[J]. 中国社会科学, 2001(5): 125-135, 207.
|
|
[9]
|
程啸. 侵权责任法教程[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2017: 107.
|
|
[10]
|
方新军. 权益区分保护与违法性要件[J]. 南大法学, 2021(2): 1-23.
|
|
[11]
|
王利明. 我国侵权责任法采纳了违法性要件吗? [J]. 中外法学, 2012, 24(1): 5-23.
|