基于博弈论组合赋权改进物元可拓模型的新能源汽车制造企业供应链绩效评价研究
Research on Supply Chain Performance Evaluation of New Energy Vehicle Manufacturing Enterprises Improved Matter-Element Extension Model Based on Game Theory Combined Weighting
摘要: 在全球气候变化与绿色发展的背景下,新能源汽车制造企业的供应链绩效评价对于提升运营效率、优化资源配置,实现可持续发展具有重要意义。针对现状供应链绩效评价研究在指标选取、理论框架和权重分配等方面的不足,本研究结合博弈论组合赋权与改进物元可拓模型,构建了一种新型的新能源汽车制造企业供应链绩效评价体系。首先,基于ESG理论及行业特点,从财务、顾客、运营、绿色环保和发展成长五个维度构建了包含15项指标的综合评价体系。其次,采用变异系数法和熵权法分别计算各指标权重,并运用博弈论进行组合优化,以平衡不同赋权方法的差异,提高权重分配的合理性。再次,将组合权重引入物元可拓模型,通过关联函数量化指标与绩效等级的匹配程度,实现绩效的动态评价。最后,以国内某知名新能源车企2018~2023年的数据为案例进行实证分析,结果表明:新能源汽车销售量、市场占有率和净资产收益率是影响供应链绩效的关键因素;绿色环保维度表现较弱,需重点关注;企业绩效随时间推移显著提升,验证了模型的有效性。
Abstract: Under the backdrop of global climate change and green development, the supply chain performance evaluation of new energy vehicle manufacturing enterprises is of great significance for enhancing operational efficiency, optimizing resource allocation, and achieving sustainable development. In response to the deficiencies in the current research on supply chain performance evaluation in terms of indicator selection, theoretical framework, and weight allocation, this study combines game theory-based combined weighting and an improved matter-element extension model to construct a novel supply chain performance evaluation system for new energy vehicle manufacturing enterprises. Firstly, based on ESG theory and industry characteristics, a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of 15 indicators is established from five dimensions: finance, customers, operations, green environmental protection, and development and growth. Secondly, the coefficient of variation method and entropy weight method are used to calculate the weights of each indicator, and game theory is applied for combined optimization to balance the differences among different weighting methods and improve the rationality of weight allocation. Thirdly, the combined weights are introduced into the matter-element extension model, and the matching degree between indicators and performance levels is quantified through the correlation function to achieve dynamic performance evaluation. Finally, an empirical analysis is conducted using the data of a well-known domestic new energy vehicle manufacturer from 2018 to 2023. The results show that new energy vehicle sales volume, market share, and return on net assets are the key factors influencing supply chain performance; the performance in the green environmental protection dimension is relatively weak and requires focused attention; and the enterprise performance has significantly improved over time, verifying the effectiveness of the model.
文章引用:王禹皓, 范海雁, 王旭豪. 基于博弈论组合赋权改进物元可拓模型的新能源汽车制造企业供应链绩效评价研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2025, 15(4): 319-333. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2025.154217

参考文献

[1] 赵巧之, 陈昊. 中国新能源汽车产业技术创新的竞合关系研究——基于Lotka-Volterra种群竞争模型分析[J]. 技术经济, 2024, 43(12): 47-59.
[2] 周天成, 程建宁. 我国新能源汽车产业链供应链韧性和安全研究[J]. 供应链管理, 2025, 6(3): 35-45.
[3] 林超. 我国新能源汽车产业发展成绩、面临风险挑战以及对策建议[J]. 中国经贸导刊, 2024(3): 38-40.
[4] 孙海鹏, 彭雨. 汽车行业绿色供应链环境绩效评价的探讨[J]. 中国环保产业, 2020(9): 20-24.
[5] 王革, 郭思妙. 产业链创新视角下战略性新兴产业技术转移网络演化研究——以锂离子动力电池产业为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(11): 81-90.
[6] 张慧, 解佳琪. 新供应链集中度、双元创新战略与新能源汽车产业链企业财务绩效——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 科技管理学报, 2025, 27(1): 92-101.
[7] 王超. 数字孪生赋能智能网联汽车供应链: 复杂性解析与韧性构建[J]. 物流技术, 2025, 44(4): 13-24.
[8] 史文利. 供应链绩效的多维评价研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 天津: 天津大学, 2008.
[9] 林志炳, 鲍蕾. 企企业社会责任对供应链减排决策及政府补贴效率的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 111-121.
[10] 张韵文. 中国新能源汽车产业绿色供应链管理研究[J]. 中国航务周刊, 2024(48): 71-73.
[11] 孔佳玲. 基于ESG评估的企业环境责任与财务绩效研究[J]. 国际商务财会, 2024(22): 79-82.
[12] Ma, L. and Song, M. (2022) Approaches to Carbon Emission Reductions and Technology in China’s Chemical Industry to Achieve Carbon Neutralization. Energies, 15, Article 5401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Yang, C.S. (2018) An Analysis of Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management, and Green Performance in the Container Shipping Context. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 61, 246-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Mumtaz, U., Ali, Y., Petrillo, A. and De Felice, F. (2018) Identifying the Critical Factors of Green Supply Chain Management: Environmental Benefits in Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 640, 144-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Shahzad, F., Du, J., Khan, I., Shahbaz, M., Murad, M. and Khan, M.A.S. (2020) Untangling the Influence of Organizational Compatibility on Green Supply Chain Management Efforts to Boost Organizational Performance through Information Technology Capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, Article 122029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Nureen, N., Xin, Y., Irfan, M. and Fahad, S. (2023) Going Green: How Do Green Supply Chain Management and Green Training Influence Firm Performance? Evidence from a Developing Country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 57448-57459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Pulansari, F. and Putri, A. (2020) Green Supply Chain Operation Reference (green SCOR) Performance Evaluation (Case Study: Steel Company). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1569, Article 032006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 郑季良, 周旋. 钢铁企业供应链协同效应评价模型研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(S1): 563-568.
[19] Jin, B.H. (2021) Research on Performance Evaluation of Green Supply Chain of Automobile Enterprises under the Background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutralization. Energy Reports, 7, 594-604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Thanki, S. and Thakkar, J. (2018) A Quantitative Framework for Lean and Green Assessment of Supply Chain Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67, 366-400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Patil, S.K. and Kant, R. (2016) Evaluating the Impact of Knowledge Management Adoption on Supply Chain Performance by BSC-FANP Approach: An Empirical Case Study. Tékhne, 14, 52-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Adel, H.M. (2021) Mapping and Assessing Green Entrepreneurial Performance: Evidence from a Vertically Integrated Organic Beverages Supply Chain. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 7, 78-98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Malviya, R.K. and Kant, R. (2019) Developing Integrated Framework to Measure Performance of Green Supply Chain Management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27, 634-665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef