道家“不言”与海德格尔“道说”的异同

Similarities and Differences between Taoist “Silence” and Heidegger’s “Taoism”

摘要: 道家哲学中的“不言”与海德格尔“道说”在超越语言局限、探索“道”方面有差异和联系。老子和庄子倡导通过非言语直觉体验来领悟“道”，而海德格尔则认为“道说”揭示语言作为存在的显现。道家追求内在自然和谐，海德格尔则探讨存在论框架下的语言和诗性维度；道家的“不言”指向无为而治，海德格尔则批判技术语言对语言本质的侵犯。

Abstract: There are differences and connections between “silence” in Taoist philosophy and Heidegger’s “Taoism” in transcending language limitations and exploring “Tao”. Laozi and Zhuangzi advocated understanding “Tao” through non-verbal intuitive experience, while Heidegger believed that “Taoism” reveals language as the manifestation of existence. Taoism pursues inner natural harmony, while Heidegger explores the language and poetic dimensions under the framework of ontology; Taoist “silence” points to inaction and governance, while Heidegger criticizes the infringement of technical language on the essence of language.