F-SOZU K-14社会支持问卷在大学生中的性别和纵向测量等值性
Gender and Longitudinal Measurement Equivalence of the F-SOZU K-14 Social Support Questionnaire in College Students
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2025.158451, PDF,   
作者: 张钰奇：华北理工大学心理与精神卫生学院，河北省心理健康与脑科学重点实验室，河北 唐山；杨紫欣：唐山海运职业学院马克思主义学院，河北 唐山；Muhammad Dawood：华北理工大学临床医学院，河北 唐山；马红霞*：华北理工大学大学生心理健康教育与咨询中心，河北 唐山
关键词: K-14社会支持问卷；大学生；验证性因素分析；性别等值；纵向测量等值；F-SOZU K-14； College Students； CFA； Gender Invariance； Longitudinal Invariance
摘要: 目的：探究F-SOZU K-14社会支持问卷在中国大学生群体中的性别等值性及纵向测量等值性。方法：以1000名大学生为调查对象，三次使用K-14社会支持问卷测量同一批大学生的感知社会支持情况，采用单组和多组验证性因素分析比较。结果：单组验证性因素分析证明K-14的单因素结构模型在三个时间点均拟合良好，多组验证性因素分析显示K-14在三个时间点的形态等值、单位等值、尺度等值和严格等值模型均可被接受。结论：K-14社会支持问卷在性别和时间上具有测量等值性。
Abstract: Objective: Exploring gender invariance and longitudinal measurement invariance of the F-SOZU K-14 Social Support Questionnaire in Chinese college students. Methods: A survey of 1000 college students was conducted three times using the K-14 Social Support Questionnaire Measuring perceived social support in the same cohort of college students. The comparison was conducted using single-group and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Results: Single-group and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis proves that the single factor structural model of K-14 fits well at all three time points. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that the configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance and strict invariance fitted well at three time points. Conclusion: The K-14 Social Support Questionnaire emerges as invariant across gender and time.
文章引用：张钰奇, 杨紫欣, Muhammad Dawood, 马红霞 (2025). F-SOZU K-14社会支持问卷在大学生中的性别和纵向测量等值性. 心理学进展, 15(8), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.158451

参考文献

[1] 朱美侠, 蔡丹, 武云露, Zhang Xiaochi, Juergen Margraf (2016). 大学生社会支持对乐观倾向的影响: 心理弹性与心理一致感的中介作用. 心理科学, 39(2), 371-376.
[2] Arnett, J. J. et al. (2014). The New Life Stage of Emerging Adulthood at Ages 18-29 Years: Implications for Mental Health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 569-576.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Bieda, A., Hirschfeld, G., Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2017). Universal Happiness? Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of Scales Assessing Positive Mental Health. Psychological Assessment, 29, 408-421.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Chen, F. F. (2008). What Happens If We Compare Chopsticks with Forks? The Impact of Making Inappropriate Comparisons in Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005-1018.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.[CrossRef] 
[6] Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.[CrossRef] 
[7] Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H., & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social Relationships and Health. In S. Cohen, et al. (Eds.), Social Support Measurement and Intervention (pp. 3-26). Oxford University Press.[CrossRef] 
[8] Drageset, J. (2021). Social Support. In G. Haugan, & M. Eriksson (Eds.), Health Promotion in Health Care—Vital Theories and Research (pp. 137-144). Springer International Publishing.[CrossRef] 
[9] Ernst, B. L. V., Kreher, D., Patschan, D., Haak, R., Ebert, T., de Fallois, J. et al. (2024). Self-Efficacy, Social Support and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Kidney Transplantation and under Hemodialysis. BMC Nephrology, 25, Article No. 441.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fincham, J. E. (2008). Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72, Article No. 43.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Freiberger, A., Andonian-Dierks, C., Beckmann, J., Freilinger, S., Ewert, P., Henningsen, P. et al. (2024). Post-Traumatic Distress in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Protective Factors and Clinical Implications. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Fydrich, T., Sommer, G., Tydecks, S., & Brähler, E. (2009). Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14). Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 18, 43-48.[CrossRef] 
[13] Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.[CrossRef] 
[14] Kirwan, E. M., Burns, A., O’Súilleabháin, P. S., Summerville, S., McGeehan, M., McMahon, J. et al. (2024). Loneliness in Emerging Adulthood: A Scoping Review. Adolescent Research Review, 10, 47-67.[CrossRef] 
[15] Kliem, S., Mößle, T., Rehbein, F., Hellmann, D. F., Zenger, M., & Brähler, E. (2015). A Brief Form of the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU) Was Developed, Validated, and Standardized. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68, 551-562.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2023). Measurement Invariance Testing Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Alignment Optimization: A Tutorial for Transparent Analysis Planning and Reporting. Psychological Methods, 28, 905-924.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Petersen, J., Reinwarth, A. C., Beutel, M. E., Brähler, E., & Decker, O. (2024). Development and Validation of a Brief Three-Item Form of the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (F-SozU K-3). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 24, Article ID: 100496.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Rutkowska, E., Furmańska, J., Lane, H., Marques, C. C., Martins, M. J., Sahar, N. U. et al. (2023). Determinants of Psychotherapists’ Attitudes to Online Psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, Article ID: 1196907.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] VandenBos, G. R. (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.[CrossRef]