AI影像辅助诊断系统在急性阑尾炎分型中的准确性与外科决策影响
The Accuracy of AI Imaging-Assisted Diagnostic System in the Classification of Acute Appendicitis and the Impact of Surgical Decision-Making
摘要: 人工智能影像辅助诊断系统在急性阑尾炎分型诊断中展现出显著优势,其通过深度学习算法(如卷积神经网络、随机森林)精准量化阑尾直径、周围渗出及结石特征等影像学参数,有效突破传统诊断瓶颈。研究表明,AI模型对急性阑尾炎分型(单纯性与复杂性)的诊断准确率超过80%,曲线下面积(AUC)峰值达0.985,显著优于传统Alvarado评分系统;其中3D CT分层注意力网络使复杂性阑尾炎分型的AUC提升7.1%,特异性达94%。该系统在多模态影像应用中表现突出:CT导向模型对复杂性阑尾炎(如坏疽或穿孔)的识别敏感度达73%~90.6%;MRI结合AI对孕妇群体的阴性预测值达100%,特异性达97%,有效避免不必要辐射;而超声模型通过迁移学习优化亦提升分型精度。AI分型结果直接影响外科决策:精准区分单纯性(适用抗生素治疗,成功率近70%)与复杂性病变(需紧急手术)后,阴性阑尾切除率降低21%~47%,并优化手术时机选择(如坏疽性阑尾炎的24小时手术窗)。此外,AI系统通过缩短确诊时间(如MRI结合AI使诊断缩短至30分钟内)、减少CT使用率(达27%~40%)及降低穿孔等并发症风险,全面优化患者管理流程。未来需解决多中心数据标准化、算法可解释性及临床整合等挑战,以推进临床转化应用。
Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based imaging-assisted diagnostic systems demonstrate significant advantages in the classification diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Utilizing deep learning algorithms (like Convolutional Neural Networks and Random Forests), these systems precisely quantify key imaging parameters, including appendiceal diameter, surrounding exudate, and appendicolith features, effectively overcoming limitations inherent in traditional diagnostic approaches. Research indicates AI models achieve diagnostic accuracy exceeding 80% for differentiating acute appendicitis types (simple vs. complicated), with peak Area Under the Curve (AUC) values reaching 0.985, significantly outperforming the traditional Alvarado scoring system; notably, a 3D CT hierarchical attention network improved the AUC for complicated appendicitis classification by 7.1%, achieving 94% specificity. The system excels in multimodal imaging applications: CT-guided models show 73%~90.6% sensitivity for identifying complicated appendicitis (e.g., gangrenous or perforated); MRI combined with AI achieves a 100% Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and 97% specificity in pregnant populations, effectively avoiding unnecessary radiation; ultrasound models optimized via transfer learning also demonstrate improved classification accuracy. AI classification directly impacts surgical decision-making: by accurately distinguishing simple appendicitis (suitable for antibiotic therapy with nearly 70% success) from complicated disease (requiring urgent surgery), the rate of negative appendectomy rates decreases by 21%~47% and the surgical timing is optimized (e.g., identifying the 24-hour window for gangrenous appendicitis). Furthermore, AI systems optimize patient management processes by shortening diagnostic time (e.g., MRI + AI reducing diagnosis to within 30 minutes), decreasing CT utilization rates (by 27%~40%), and reducing complication risks like perforation. Future advancement requires addressing challenges, including multicenter data standardization, algorithm interpretability, and seamless clinical integration to advance clinical translational implementation.
文章引用:周鑫涛, 隋雪松, 赵志军. AI影像辅助诊断系统在急性阑尾炎分型中的准确性与外科决策影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(8): 625-634. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2025.1582275

参考文献

[1] Benabbas, R., Hanna, M., Shah, J. and Sinert, R. (2017) Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Tests, and Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24, 523-551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Pedrosa, I., Levine, D., Eyvazzadeh, A.D., Siewert, B., Ngo, L. and Rofsky, N.M. (2006) MR Imaging Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy. Radiology, 238, 891-899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Russell, W.S., Schuh, A.M., Hill, J.G., Hebra, A., Cina, R.A., Smith, C.D., et al. (2013) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Appendicitis Evaluation Can Decrease Computed Tomography Utilization While Maintaining Diagnostic Accuracy. Pediatric Emergency Care, 29, 568-573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Wang, Z., Bao, F., Liang, W., Wu, H., Lin, Z., Xu, J., et al. (2023) Appendicitis in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 51, 1492-1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Rud, B., Vejborg, T.S., Rappeport, E.D., Reitsma, J.B. and Wille-Jørgensen, P. (2019) Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 11, CD009977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Levine, C.D., Aizenstein, O., Lehavi, O. and Blachar, A. (2005) Why We Miss the Diagnosis of Appendicitis on Abdominal CT: Evaluation of Imaging Features of Appendicitis Incorrectly Diagnosed on CT. American Journal of Roentgenology, 184, 855-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Sammalkorpi, H.E., Mentula, P., Savolainen, H. and Leppäniemi, A. (2017) The Introduction of Adult Appendicitis Score Reduced Negative Appendectomy Rate. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 106, 196-201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] di Saverio, S., Podda, M., De Simone, B., et al. (2020) Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis: 2020 Update of the WSES Jerusalem Guidelines. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 15, Article No. 27.
[9] Sula, S., Paananen, T., Tammilehto, V., Hurme, S., Mattila, A., Rantanen, T., et al. (2024) Impact of an Appendicolith and Its Characteristics on the Severity of Acute Appendicitis. BJS Open, 8, zrae093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Moris, D., Paulson, E.K. and Pappas, T.N. (2021) Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults. JAMA, 326, 2299-2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 林明治, 惠一鸣, 李斌, 等. 基于人工智能影像学特征参数构建部分实性肺结节良恶性预测模型的应用价值[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2025, 28(4): 281-290.
[12] Issaiy, M., Zarei, D. and Saghazadeh, A. (2023) Artificial Intelligence and Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Models. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 18, Article No. 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Zhang, D., Khatonabadi, M., Kim, H., Jude, M., Zaragoza, E., Lee, M., et al. (2012) Diagnostic Accuracy at Several Reduced Radiation Dose Levels for CT Imaging in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis. SPIE Proceedings, 8313, Article ID: 831347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] D’Souza, N., Hicks, G., Beable, R., Higginson, A. and Rud, B. (2021) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD012028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Hung, N.D., Dung, L.T., Dung, N.K., Khuong, N.H., Anh, N.H. and Duc, N.M. (2023) Diagnostic Value of 3D T1-Weighted Gradient-Echo and 2D T1-Weighted In-Phase and Out-Of-Phase Gradient-Echo Sequences for Appendicitis Diagnosis in Pregnant Women. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science, 13, Article 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Repplinger, M.D., Levy, J.F., Peethumnongsin, E., Gussick, M.E., Svenson, J.E., Golden, S.K., et al. (2015) Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of the Accuracy of MRI to Diagnose Appendicitis in the General Population. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 43, 1346-1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Huang, C., Hwai, H., Lee, C. and Wu, P. (2025) A Hierarchical Slice Attention Network for Appendicitis Classification in 3D CT Scans. 2025 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Houston, 14-17 April 2025, 1-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 陈蔓林, 岳靖, 曹栩睿, 等. 基于模糊PID控制的智能艾灸机械臂设计[J]. 智能城市应用, 2025, 8(4): 80-83.
[19] Kaewlai, R., Tongsai, S., Teerasamit, W., Wongsaengchan, D., Noppakunsomboon, N., Khamman, P., et al. (2023) Validation of Scoring Systems for the Prediction of Complicated Appendicitis in Adults Using Clinical and Computed Tomographic Findings. Insights into Imaging, 14, Article No. 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Rapp, E.J., Naim, F., Kadivar, K., Davarpanah, A. and Cornfeld, D. (2013) Integrating MR Imaging into the Clinical Workup of Pregnant Patients Suspected of Having Appendicitis Is Associated with a Lower Negative Laparotomy Rate: Single-Institution Study. Radiology, 267, 137-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Cho, S.U. and Oh, S.K. (2021) Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Acute Appendicitis during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery, 27, 271-277.
[22] 乔洪波. 多层螺旋CT联合高频超声对急性阑尾炎诊断与术后病理对照准确性及影像学特征研究[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2012, 35(12): 63-64.
[23] Mervak, B.M., Wilson, S.B., Handly, B.D., Altun, E. and Burke, L.M. (2019) MRI of Acute Appendicitis. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 50, 1367-1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Rezak, A. (2011) Decreased Use of Computed Tomography with a Modified Clinical Scoring System in Diagnosis of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis. Archives of Surgery, 146, 64-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 李旭文, 魏爱泓, 姜晟, 等. 基于“哨兵3号”卫星OLCI影像和C2RCC算法的南黄海叶绿素a及总悬浮物反演效果分析[J]. 环境监控与预警, 2020, 12(2): 6-12.
[26] 吴阶平医学基金会模拟医学部胸外科专委会. 人工智能在肺结节诊治中的应用专家共识(2022年版) [J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2022, 25(4): 219-225.
[27] Mällinen, J., Rautio, T., Grönroos, J., Rantanen, T., Nordström, P., Savolainen, H., et al. (2019) Risk of Appendiceal Neoplasm in Periappendicular Abscess in Patients Treated with Interval Appendectomy vs Follow-Up with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 1-Year Outcomes of the Peri-Appendicitis Acuta Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery, 154, 200-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Thieme, M.E., Leeuwenburgh, M.M.N., Valdehueza, Z.D., et al. (2014) Diagnostic Accuracy and Patient Acceptance of MRI in Children with Suspected Appendicitis. European Radiology, 24, 630-637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]