直播电商背景下线上商家与主播的合作模式及定价策略研究
Research on Different Cooperation Modes and Pricing Strategies for Online Seller in Live-Streaming Market
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1482626, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 唐可欣, 何 向*:南京邮电大学数字媒体与艺术设计学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 直播电商合作模式定价策略Stackelberg博弈模型Live-Streaming Cooperation Mode Pricing Strategy Stackelberg Game Model
摘要: 在直播电商迅猛发展的背景下,线上商家如何与主播进行合作、并制定合理的定价策略成为亟待研究的问题。为此,本文构建了固定佣金、灵活佣金两种合作模式下的决策模型,旨在揭示不同合作模式下商家与主播的最优决策与收益。研究结果表明:商家的最终收益受到坑位费、佣金比例、需求敏感系数等多重因素的综合影响。固定佣金模式下,商家收益相对稳定但可能因高坑位费而压缩利润空间;灵活佣金模式则通过风险共担机制促进了销量增长,但要求产品利润空间能够支持较高的佣金比例。因此,商家在选择合作模式时,需综合各项因素,以制定最优的定价策略和合作方案。
Abstract: In the context of the rapid development of live streaming e-commerce, how online sellers can collaborate with streamers and formulate reasonable pricing strategies has become a pressing issue that needs to be studied. Therefore, this paper has constructed decision-making models under two cooperation modes: fixed commission and flexible commission, aiming to reveal the optimal decisions and profits of merchants and hosts under different cooperation modes. The research findings underscore the online seller’s ultimate revenue is contingent upon a multitude of factors, including pit fees, commission rates, and demand sensitivity coefficients. Under the fixed-commission model, the merchant’s revenue remains relatively stable; however, it may experience compression in profit margins due to high pit fees. In contrast, the flexible-commission model fosters sales volume growth through a risk-sharing mechanism, albeit it requires the product’s profit margins to be sufficient to support higher commission rates. Consequently, when electing a cooperation mode, sellers must meticulously weigh these variables to devise optimal pricing strategies and collaborative frameworks.
文章引用:唐可欣, 何向. 直播电商背景下线上商家与主播的合作模式及定价策略研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(8): 1130-1140. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1482626

参考文献

[1] 2024年中国直播电商行业分析: 市场规模突破5.8万亿元, AI技术重塑产业生态[EB/OL].
https://www.vzkoo.com/read/202505134fe98b33b626fac141317a92.html, 2025-05-13.
[2] Guo, Y., Zhang, K. and Wang, C. (2022) Way to Success: Understanding Top Streamer’s Popularity and Influence from the Perspective of Source Characteristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, Article ID: 102786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Liu, H. and Liu, S. (2021) Optimal Decisions and Coordination of Live Streaming Selling under Revenue‐sharing Contracts. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42, 1022-1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Zhang, T. and Tang, Z. (2023) Should Manufacturers Open Live Streaming Shopping Channels? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, Article ID: 103229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 姜宁, 郭青青, 顾锋, 等. 直播购物中产品稀缺性对冲动购买意愿的影响研究——直播平台和主播特质的调节作用[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2023, 28(4): 1-8.
[6] Chang, C., Yen, C., Chou, S. and Lo, W. (2023) What Motivates Viewers to Purchase Recommended Products in Live Streaming? The Moderating Role of Extroversion-Introversion Personality. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35, 2983-3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Lu, S., Yao, D., Chen, X. and Grewal, R. (2021) Do Larger Audiences Generate Greater Revenues under Pay What You Want? Evidence from a Live Streaming Platform. Marketing Science, 40, 964-984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Gu, Z., Zhao, X. and Wu, D.J. (2024) A Model of Shoppertainment Live Streaming. Management Science. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Forderer, J., Gutt, D. and Greenwood, B.N. (2025) Star Wars: An Empirical Study of Star Performer Turnover and Content Supply on Multisided Streaming Platforms. Information Systems Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 梁喜, 刘怀英, 胡诗艺. 直播模式对电商供应链定价与质量决策的影响研究——基于制造商店铺自播与委托主播带货两种模式的比较分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2022(9): 154-157, 207.
[11] Zhang, W., Yu, L. and Wang, Z. (2023) Live-Streaming Selling Modes on a Retail Platform. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 173, Article ID: 103096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Jin, D., Lai, D., Pu, X. and Han, G. (2024) Self-Broadcasting or Cooperating with Streamers? A Perspective on Live Streaming Sales of Fresh Products. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 64, Article ID: 101367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Zhang, Y. and Xu, Q. (2023) Proportional Incentive Contracts in Live Streaming Commerce Supply Chain Based on Target Sales Volume. Electronic Commerce Research, 25, 241-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Wan, Q., Chen, J., Yu, C., Lu, M. and Liu, D. (2024) Optimal Marketing Strategies for Live Streaming Rooms in Livestream E-Commerce. Electronic Commerce Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 程永伟. 直播带货的合作模式与决策优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 297-306.
[16] Zhang, Y., Xu, Q. and Zhang, G. (2023) Optimal Contracts with Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in a Live Streaming Commerce Market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, Article ID: 103419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 周驰, 李赫, 于静. 委托代理关系下品牌商网络直播营销激励机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 265-274.
[18] 于天阳, 关志民, 董经洋, 等. 不同权力结构下考虑网红营销努力的直播电商供应链决策研究[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(5): 714-722, 748.
[19] 胡娇, 李莉, 张华, 等. 考虑参照效应和主播影响力的网络直播平台动态定价决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(3): 755-766.
[20] Wang, Q., Zhao, N. and Ji, X. (2022) Reselling or Agency Selling? The Strategic Role of Live Streaming Commerce in Distribution Contract Selection. Electronic Commerce Research, 24, 983-1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 魏莹, 徐楚翔, 杨锐思. 考虑定价权差异的直播渠道引入策略分析[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-25. 2025-05-19.[CrossRef