儿童肱骨外髁骨折克氏针处理方式的Meta分析:暴露与埋藏?
A Meta Analysis of Kirschner Wires in Children with Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures: Be Exposed or Buried?
DOI: 10.12677/jcpm.2025.44445, PDF,   
作者: 曹志远, 刘友饶, 吴 毅, 程熙清, 阮四军:九江学院附属医院运动医学小儿骨科,江西 九江;张莲英*:九江学院附属医院超声科,江西 九江
关键词: 肱骨外髁骨折儿童克氏针暴露埋藏Meta分析Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures Children Kirschner Wires Exposed Buried Meta Analysis
摘要: 目的:通过Meta分析系统评价克氏针暴露和埋藏在儿童肱骨外髁骨折的安全性。方法:通过计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、美国国立医学图书馆、考克兰图书馆、Web of Science等数据库,检索时间自建库至2024年12月国内外发表的有关克氏针暴露和埋藏治疗儿童肱骨外髁骨折的文献。根据设定的纳入与排除标准筛选文献并进行质量评价,使用RevMan5.3软件对两组在不良事件发生率、术后感染率、骨不愈合/延迟愈合率、非计划再手术率、拔针时间及肘关节功能优良率等方面进行统计分析。结果:共纳入7项研究738例患儿,暴露组288例,埋藏组450例。分析显示,相比于克氏针暴露组,克氏针埋藏组术后感染率更低[OR = 0.48, 95%CI (0.29, 0.78), P = 0.003],克氏针埋藏组术后拔针时间较克氏针暴露组晚[OR = 19.11, 95%CI (4.38, 33.84), P = 0.01]。两组在不良事件发生率、骨不愈合/延迟愈合率、非计划再手术率及肘关节功能优良率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:对于未成年儿童肱骨外髁骨折,将克氏针埋藏于皮下感染率更低,克氏针在体内保留时间更长,拔除后无需额外石膏固定。并且埋藏克氏针能提高患儿舒适性便于术后护理。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the security of exposed versus buried Kirschner wires fixation in the treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Cochrane library and Web of Science database from inception to December 2024. Studies comparing exposed and buried Kirschner wires in the treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children were included. Outcome measures included and excluded by a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluated for their quality. The incidence of adverse events, postoperative infection rate, non-union/delayed union rate, unplanned re-operation rate, Kirschner wires removal time, and excellent elbow joint function rate were extracted and analyzed using software RevMan5.3. Results: 7 studies involving 738 patients were included, with 288 patients in the exposed group and 450 patients in the buried group. The infection rate in buried group was significantly lower than that in exposed group [OR = 0.48, 95%CI (0.29, 0.78), P = 0.003] according to the meta analysis. Buried Kirschner wires exhibit prolonged retention time in the body [OR = 19.11, 95%CI (4.38, 33.84), P = 0.01]. There was no variation in the incidence of adverse events, non-union/delayed union rate, unplanned re-operation rate, and elbow joint function between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For lateral humeral condyle fractures, buried Kirschner wires had a lower infection rate than exposed, Kirschner wires exhibit prolonged retention time in the body and did not need additional plaster fixation is required after removal. Furthermore, buried Kirschner wires can improve the comfort of children and facilitate postoperative care.
文章引用:曹志远, 刘友饶, 吴毅, 程熙清, 阮四军, 张莲英. 儿童肱骨外髁骨折克氏针处理方式的Meta分析:暴露与埋藏?[J]. 临床个性化医学, 2025, 4(4): 276-284. https://doi.org/10.12677/jcpm.2025.44445

参考文献

[1] Jacobsen, M.G. and Andersen, M.J. (2022) Current Concepts in Pediatric Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures. Ugeskrift for Læger, 184, V12200939.
[2] Tan, S.H.S., Dartnell, J., Lim, A.K.S. and Hui, J.H. (2018) Paediatric Lateral Condyle Fractures: A Systematic Review. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 138, 809-817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Lieber, J., Dietzel, M., Tsiflikas, I., Schäfer, J., Kirschner, H.-J. and Fuchs, J. (2019) Treatment Principles and Outcome after Fractures of the Lateral Humeral Condyle in Children. Der Unfallchirurg, 122, 345-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Aibara, N., Takagi, T. and Seki, A. (2022) Late Displacement after Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 31, 2164-2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Bullmann, T., Stucki, C., Kaiser, N. and Ziebarth, K. (2024) Fractures of the Lateral Condyle of the Humerus in Children: High Risk of Secondary Dislocation with Conservative Treatment. Die Unfallchirurgie, 127, 522-530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Jakob, R., Fowles, J.V., Rang, M. and Kassab, M.T. (1975) Observations Concerning Fractures of the Lateral Humeral Condyle in Children. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 57, 430-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Li, W.C. and Xu, R.J. (2012) Comparison of Kirschner Wires and AO Cannulated Screw Internal Fixation for Displaced Lateral Humeral Condyle Fracture in Children. International Orthopaedics, 36, 1261-1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Bloom, T., Chen, L.Y. and Sabharwal, S. (2011) Biomechanical Analysis of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fracture Pinning. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 31, 130-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Wormald, J.C.R., Jain, A., Lloyd-Hughes, H., Gardiner, S. and Gardiner, M.D. (2017) A Systematic Review of the Influence of Burying or Not Burying Kirschner Wires on Infection Rates Following Fixation of Upper Extremity Fractures. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 70, 1298-1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ormsby, N.M., Walton, R.D.M., Robinson, S., Brookes-Fazakerly, S., Yuen Chang, F., McGonagle, L., et al. (2016) Buried versus Unburied Kirschner Wires in the Management of Paediatric Lateral Condyle Elbow Fractures. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 25, 69-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] McGonagle, L., Elamin, S. and Wright, D. (2012) Buried or Unburied K-Wires for Lateral Condyle Elbow Fractures. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 94, 513-516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Das De, S., Bae, D.S. and Waters, P.M. (2012) Displaced Humeral Lateral Condyle Fractures in Children: Should We Bury the Pins? Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 32, 573-578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Sahoo, M.M., Sahoo, U.S. and Jena, M. (2021) Exposed versus Buried K-Wire Fixation in Paediatric Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures: Preliminary Communication of a Prospective Comparative Study. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B, 31, 281-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 曾晓辉, 万玲玲, 夏群英. 暴露与埋藏克氏针内固定治疗小儿肱骨外髁骨折的临床研究[J]. 当代医学, 2021, 27(30): 118-119.
[15] 吴敏, 易申德, 蔡军, 等. 儿童肱骨外髁骨折克氏针尾皮下埋藏与暴露疗效分析[J]. 江西医药, 2020, 55(11): 1607-1608.
[16] Prasad, A., Mishra, P., Aggarwal, A.N., Chadha, M., Pandey, R. and Anshuman, R. (2018) Exposed versus Buried Kirschner Wires Used in Displaced Pediatric Fractures of Lateral Condyle of Humerus. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 52, 548-553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Chan, L.W.M. and Siow, H.M. (2011) Exposed versus Buried Wires for Fixation of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures in Children: A Comparison of Safety and Efficacy. Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics, 5, 329-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Stang, A. (2010) Critical Evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology, 25, 603-605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Cardona, J.I., Riddle, E. and Kumar, S.J. (2002) Displaced Fractures of the Lateral Humeral Condyle: Criteria for Implant Removal. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 22, 194-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Thomas, D.P., Howard, A.W., Cole, W.G. and Hedden, D.M. (2001) Three Weeks of Kirschner Wire Fixation for Displaced Lateral Condylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 21, 565-569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Sorenson, S.M. and Hennrikus, W. (2015) Pain during Office Removal of K-Wires from the Elbow in Children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 35, 341-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]