数据驱动下广西民办高校科研绩效评价体系构建与应用研究——以南宁学院为例
Study on the Construction and Application Data-Driven Evaluation System of Scientific Research Performance for Private Universities in Guangxi—A Case Study of Nanning University
摘要: 随着中国高等教育的快速发展,民办高校已成为高等教育体系的重要组成部分,但其科研业绩评价体系存在诸多问题,如科研投入不足、激励政策不到位、评价体系不完善等。科研业绩评价面临诸多挑战。本研究聚焦中国民办高等教育,以南宁学院为例,基于数据驱动分析其2020~2024年科研投入、产出和影响力情况。研究显示,科研投入对产出和影响力有显著正向驱动,如投入每增加1单位,产出提高0.85单位、影响力提升0.92单位。在具体指标上,高层次人才数量直接影响论文质量,高级职称系数与SCI论文发表数量的比值系数r = 0.985**,p = 0.002;经费投入助力成果转化,横向课题经费每增加100万元,专利转化量平均提升8.7件(β = 0.087);设施投入对项目立项关键,科研设备总值与省部级项目数量的比值系数r = 0.924*,p = 0.025;成果转化与社会贡献评分达4.46/4.57,印证“应用导向”定位。同时,学生参与项目数增加对科研投入促进影响力有调节效应。据此提出建议:加大科研投入,优化资金分配,重视人才培养;改革评价体系,关注质量和影响力,引入动态及国际评审;推动科研影响力提升,加强学术交流、成果转化及学生科研参与。本研究为民办高校科研业绩评价提供新思路,助力区域教育发展和创新能力提升。
Abstract: With the rapid development of higher education in China, private universities have become an important part of the higher education system. However, there are many problems with their scientific research performance evaluation system, such as insufficient scientific research investment, inadequate incentive policies, and an imperfect evaluation system, making the evaluation of scientific research performance face many challenges. This study focuses on private higher education in China, taking Nanning University as an example, and based on data-driven analysis, examines its scientific research input, output, and impact from 2020 to 2024. Research has shown that scientific research investment has a significant positive impact on its output and influence, with an increase of 0.85 units in output and 0.92 units in influence for every 1 unit increase in investment. In terms of specific indicators, the number of high-level talents directly affects the quality of papers. The ratio coefficient between the coefficient of senior professional titles and the number of SCI papers published is r = 0.985**, p = 0.002. Funding investment supports the transformation of achievements, with an average increase of 8.7 patent conversions (β = 0.087) for every 1 million yuan increase in horizontal project funding. Facility investment is crucial for project approval, and the ratio coefficient of the total value of scientific research equipment to the number of provincial and ministerial level projects is r = 0.924*, p = 0.025. The score for achievement transformation and social contribution reached 4.46/4.57, confirming the positioning of “application-oriented”. At the same time, an increase in student participation in projects has a moderating effect on the promotion of research investment. We propose three suggestions based on this analysis. Firstly, increase investment in scientific research, optimize fund allocation, and attach importance to talent cultivation. Secondly, reform the evaluation system, focus on quality and influence, and introduce dynamic and international evaluations. Thirdly, promote the enhancement of research influence, strengthen academic exchanges, achievement transformation, and student participation in scientific research. This study provides new ideas for evaluating the research performance of private universities and helps to promote regional education development and enhance innovation capabilities.
文章引用:陈芸生, 张艳雯. 数据驱动下广西民办高校科研绩效评价体系构建与应用研究——以南宁学院为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(8): 246-255. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.138592

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2024年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].
https://hudong.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202506/t20250611_1193760.html, 2025-06-11.
[2] 孟伟渊. HBGY学院(民办高校)绩效工资管理研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北地质大学, 2019.
[3] 潘会然. 民办高校科技成果转化的现状及对策——以广州新华学院为例[J]. 才智, 2021(16): 166-168.
[4] Guan, C., Mou, J. and Jiang, Z. (2020) Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Education: A Twenty-Year Data-Driven Historical Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4, 134-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 陈敬全. 科研评价方法与实证研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2004.
[6] 唐慧君. 大学科研评价体系及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2006.
[7] 李泓烨. 我国高校科技创新能力组态分析与政策效应评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2024.
[8] Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H. and Nieminen, M. (2009) Influence of Research Funding and Science Policy on University Research Performance: A Comparison of Five Countries. Science and Public Policy, 36, 419-430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 李昀, 吴华瑞, 李奇峰, 顾静秋, 李庆学, 韩笑. 协同办公平台数据驱动下的农业科研绩效评价[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2020, 43(5): 122-130.
[10] Lind, J. (2019) The Missing Link: How University Managers Mediate the Impact of a Performance-Based Research Funding System. Research Evaluation, 28, 84-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 张雪花, 黄敬洛, 陈茜, 岳鹏飞, 张淼, 霍萃萌. 地方科研院所科研绩效评价体系研究[J]. 河南科学, 2022, 40(3): 484-490.
[12] 李美娟, 李柏村, 姜靖, 阿儒涵. 美国联邦政府多元化科研资助体系的特点和启示——基于NIH资助与产出数据的分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2023, 44(12): 3-16.
[13] 阮青. 我国社会科学拔尖人才成长影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西大学, 2023.
[14] 山红梅, 陈燕, 王敏, 朱长征, 谢逢洁, 李永飞, 刘清, 李燕, 吴琦, 陈曦, 姚晨静. 西安深化统筹科技资源改革问题研究——西安市文化和科技融合发展模式及战略路径研究[R]. 西安: 西安邮电大学, 2013.
[15] Farrokhyar, F., Bianco, D., Dao, D., Ghert, M., Andruszkiewicz, N., Sussman, J., et al. (2015) Impact of Research Investment on Scientific Productivity of Junior Researchers. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6, 659-668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 马宗文, 任梅. 以论文为导向科研评价体系的影响及启示——以意大利改革实践为例[J]. 教育评论, 2024(2): 117-122.
[17] Vitanov, N.K. (2016). Science Dynamics and Research Production. Springer.[CrossRef