基于三维动态语法观的初中英语新旧教材语法板块对比研究
A Comparative Study of the Grammar Sections in New and Old Junior High School English Textbooks Based on the Three-Dimensional Grammar Framework
摘要: 在英语课程改革持续推进的背景下,《义务教育英语课程标准(2022年版)》对语法教学提出了新要求,而教材作为教学的关键依据也备受关注。本研究聚焦人教版2012版和2024版七年级上册英语教材语法板块,旨在探究三维动态语法观在其中的体现情况。结果显示,新教材在语法呈现和练习活动中更全面地融合了形式、意义、使用三个维度,活动设置层次性和梯度性更强,能有效激发学生学习兴趣、培养学生的语法知识运用能力。旧教材则更侧重于形式和意义的活动,活动形式较为单一。总体而言,新教材在落实三维动态语法观方面更具优势,为教材编写和教师教学提供了有益参考。
Abstract: With the continuous promotion of English curriculum reform, the “Compulsory Education English Curriculum Standards (2022 Edition)” have put forward new requirements for grammar teaching, and textbooks as the key basis for teaching have also received much attention. This study focuses on the grammar section of the 2012 and 2024 editions of the 7th grade English textbook published by the People’s Education Press, aiming to explore the manifestation of the three-dimensional dynamic grammar view in it. The results show that the new textbook integrates the three dimensions of form, meaning, and use more comprehensively in grammar presentation and practice activities, with stronger hierarchical and gradient activity settings, which can effectively stimulate students’ interest in learning and cultivate their ability to apply grammar knowledge. The old textbooks focused more on activities with form and meaning, and the forms of activities were relatively simple. Overall, the new textbooks have more advantages in implementing the three-dimensional dynamic grammar concept, providing useful references for textbook writing and teacher teaching.
文章引用:吴沁琳. 基于三维动态语法观的初中英语新旧教材语法板块对比研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(8): 326-333. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2025.138602

参考文献

[1] Ellis, R. (2016) Grammar Teaching as Consciousness Raising. In: Hinkel, E., Ed., Teaching English Grammar to Speakers of Other Languages, Routledge, 128-150.
[2] Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999) The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. 2nd Edition, Heinle & Heinle.
[3] 程晓堂, 孙晓慧. 英语教材分析与设计[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2011.
[4] 贾蕃, 孟洁, 黄正翠. 高中英语教材语法编写的对比研究[J]. 中小学外语教学(中学篇), 2023, 46(3): 25-30.
[5] 贾蕃, 冯钰涵, 卢珊. 基于混合法的英语专业教材语法内容编写研究[J]. 外语教学, 2024, 45(2): 65-70.
[6] 侯薇. 国内外初中英语教材语法活动对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2024.
[7] 孟钰欣. 人教版(2019)和沪教版(2020)高中英语教材语法活动的对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2023.
[8] 刘道义. 与时俱进的初中英语教材——修订后的JEFC [J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2001(11): 20-24.
[9] 王思衡. 新旧人教版高中英语教材语法板块对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2024.
[10] Celce-Murcia, M. and Hilles, S. (1988) Techniques and Resources in Teaching Grammar. Oxford University Press.
[11] Nassaji, H. and Fotos, S. (2011) Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 殷兆慧. 三维语法教学理念下的高中英语语法教学模式例析[J]. 中小学外语教学(中学篇), 2015(8): 26-32.
[13] 张舫. 基于三维动态语法观的高中英语语法教学实践[J]. 中小学外语教学(中学篇), 2021, 44(8): 56-60.
[14] 余智斌. 基于三维语法观的高中英语语法教学策略[J]. 基础外语教育, 2024, 26(4): 63-67.
[15] 杨建国, 周海岚. 基于三维动态语法观的高中英语定语从句教学探究[J]. 英语广场(学术研究), 2024(31): 128-132.
[16] 郭修远. 三维动态语法观下教学评一体化实践[J]. 江苏教育, 2023(37): 57-60, 70.
[17] 朱芝谊. 牛津上海版初中英语教材语法版块的内容分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2021.
[18] 王嘉意. 三维语法视角下高中《英语(新标准)》教材语法板块设计分析研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2020.
[19] 马路遥. 基于三维语法的高中英语教材定语从句设计比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2021.
[20] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003) Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Heinle.
[21] 王茂玮. 基于三维动态语法观的高中英语新旧教材语法板块对比研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2023.