考虑声誉效应的电商绿色供应链低碳转型激励机制研究
Research on the Incentive Mechanism for Low-Carbon Transition of E-Commerce Green Supply Chain Considering Reputation Effect
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1482680, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 毛帅杰, 朱卫平*:上海工程技术大学航空运输学院,上海;高志军:上海海事大学交通运输学院,上海
关键词: 绿色供应链数字化碳减排声誉机制激励机制电商平台Green Supply Chain Digital Carbon Reduction Reputation Mechanism Incentive Mechanism E-Commerce Platform
摘要: 针对电商绿色供应链低碳转型过程中存在的商家真实运营数据、物流环保实践平台可观测性不足导致的成员合作效率低下问题,本研究构建了基于声誉机制的电商平台–平台商家二级绿色供应链两阶段动态博弈模型,将数字化碳减排绩效纳入声誉机制中,深入分析了长期合作信号对平台商家低碳努力的激励作用。基于逆向求解与数值模拟的分析结果表明:声誉机制通过调整后期固定报酬传递长期合作信号,从而促使平台商家增加前期低碳技术投入。研究发现当数字化碳减排修正系数与贴现因子较大时,平台商家为实现电商绿色供应链低碳转型,其努力程度显著提升。若想取得供应链的帕累托最优,电商平台可以采取“先降后升”的激励策略。通过进一步的比较分析发现,动态激励模式较传统模式能有效提高绿色供应链长期收益、平台商家的努力及数字化碳减排效果,实现供应链帕累托改进并加速碳中和进程。最终研究表明声誉机制的有效性取决于平台商家议价能力与数字化碳减排激励强度间的动态平衡关系。
Abstract: In response to the inefficiency of members’ cooperation due to insufficient platform observability of merchants’ real operation data and logistics and environmental protection practices in the process of low-carbon transformation of e-commerce green supply chain, this study constructs a two-stage dynamic game model of e-commerce platform-platform merchants’ secondary green supply chain based on the reputational mechanism, incorporates the digitized carbon emission reduction performance into the reputational mechanism, and analyzes in depth the incentive role of long-term cooperation signals on the platform merchants’ low-carbon efforts. The incentive effect of the long-term cooperation signal on the low-carbon efforts of platform merchants is deeply analyzed. The results of the analysis based on inverse solution and numerical simulation show that the reputation mechanism conveys long-term cooperation signals by adjusting the fixed compensation at the later stage, which motivates the platform merchants to increase the low-carbon technology investment at the earlier stage. It is found that when the digitized carbon emission reduction correction factor and discount factor are large, the platform merchants’ efforts to realize the low-carbon transformation of the e-commerce green supply chain are significantly increased. In order to realize the Pareto optimization of the supply chain, e-commerce platforms can adopt the incentive strategy of “decrease first and then increase”. Through further comparative analysis, the dynamic incentive model is more effective than the traditional model in increasing the long-term benefits of the green supply chain, the efforts of the platform merchants, and the digital carbon emission reduction effect, thus realizing the Pareto improvement of the supply chain and accelerating the process of carbon neutrality. Finally, the study shows that the effectiveness of the reputation mechanism depends on the dynamic balance between the bargaining power of platform merchants and the strength of digital carbon reduction incentives.
文章引用:毛帅杰, 朱卫平, 高志军. 考虑声誉效应的电商绿色供应链低碳转型激励机制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(8): 1547-1559. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.1482680

参考文献

[1] Handefield, R., Walton, S., Goizueta, R.C., et al. (1996) ‘Green’ Supply Chain: Best Practices from the Furniture Industry. Proceedings of 27th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, Orlando, 24-26 November 1996, 1295-1297.
[2] Golinucci, N., Rocco, M.V., Prina, M.G., Beltrami, F., Rinaldi, L., Schau, E.M., et al. (2025) The Role of Sufficiency Measures in a Decarbonizing Europe. Ecological Economics, 235, Article ID: 108645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 杨建华, 解雯倩, 孙艺源, 等. 信息不对称下考虑供应链主导结构的产品定价及绿色推广决策研究[J/OL]. 运筹与管理: 1-8.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/34.1133.G3.20250408.1039.002.html, 2025-05-31.
[4] 王玉燕, 林飞, 申亮. 低碳合作供应链的内部合作协调与外部补贴激励机制设计[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(6): 164-183.
[5] 王道平, 殷悦, 朱梦影. 基于不同碳配额交易路径的供应链减排决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2024, 33(5): 35-41.
[6] Zhao, S., Han, Y., Zhou, Q. and Xia, X. (2025) Collaborative Management of Battery Manufacturer Responsibility in Electric Vehicle Production with ESG Due Diligence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 486, Article ID: 144591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 毋博, 周建亨. 需求和碳交易价格不确定性下的供应链数字化碳减排激励[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-15. 2025-05-31.[CrossRef
[8] 马成林, 高续瑞, 张琳, 等. 基于区块链平台的中俄木材供应链数字化碳减排合作机制[J]. 森林工程, 2025, 41(3): 565-577.
[9] 谭集丹. 绿色金融推动制造业企业供应链低碳转型的机制与路径研究[J]. 西南金融, 2025(3): 76-86.
[10] Li, B., Rahman, M.M., Haneklaus, N., Li, S. and Zhou, Y. (2025) Green Transition Initiatives to Reduce Environmental Degradation: Adaptation, Mitigation and Synergistic Effects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 115, Article ID: 107993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 王华, 彭宇. 绿色供应链试点如何提升企业碳绩效? [J]. 环境经济研究, 2025, 10(1): 158-176.
[12] 贺勇, 陈志豪, 廖诺. 政府补贴方式对绿色供应链电商平台减排决策的影响机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 87-98.
[13] Wu, R. (2023) The Carbon Footprint of Chinese Multinationals’ Foreign Affiliates. Carbon Management, 14, Article ID: 2236068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 曾现来, 李金惠, 贺克斌. 低碳转型背景下全球绿色供应链的创新与机遇[J]. 科学通报, 2025, 70(Z1): 549-555.
[15] Mouat, G., Galik, C., Venkatesh, A., Jordan, K., Sinha, A., Jaramillo, P., et al. (2025) State-Led Climate Action Can Cut Emissions at Near-Federal Costs but Favors Different Technologies. Nature Communications, 16, Article No. 4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]