协同治理视角下教育数据赋能高校教学质量提升的机制与路径研究
Research on the Mechanisms and Pathways of Education Data Empowering the Improvement of University Teaching Quality from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance
摘要: 在数字经济与教育现代化转型背景下,本研究构建了教育数据赋能高校教学质量提升的协同治理理论框架与实践路径。针对传统治理模式中管理碎片化、决策经验化、资源错配化等深层困境,提出“数据治理–协同决策–智能服务”三位一体机制:通过数据采集标准化、校级数据中台建设及隐私计算技术,构建教育数据要素流通底座;基于多元主体参与的分布式决策网络与动态监测系统,实现教学质量智能优化;依托教师数据素养认证、学生个性化学习激励及数据溯源问责机制,形成治理内生动力。研究证实,该体系可推动高校从“经验管理”向“数据治理”转型,显著提升资源配置效率与教学决策科学性。未来,需深化多模态数据融合、完善教育数据法治框架,并培育师生数字素养,以实现“因材施教”与“教育公平”的双赢局面,为高等教育质量提升提供系统性解决方案。
Abstract: In the context of the deep integration of the digital economy and knowledge economy, this study constructs a theoretical framework and practical pathway for education data empowering the improvement of teaching quality in universities. Addressing the deep-seated dilemmas of traditional governance models, such as fragmented management, experience-driven decision-making, and resource misallocation, it proposes a “data governance-collaborative decision-making-intelligent service” integrated mechanism. This framework establishes a foundation for the circulation of educational data elements through standardized data collection, the construction of a university-level data middleware platform, and privacy-preserving computing technologies. Based on a distributed decision-making network involving multiple stakeholders and a dynamic monitoring system, it realizes intelligent optimization of teaching quality. By relying on mechanisms such as teacher data literacy certification, student personalized learning incentives, and data traceability accountability, it forms an endogenous driving force for governance. The research confirms that this system can drive the transformation of universities from “experience-based management” to “data-driven governance,” significantly enhancing the efficiency of resource allocation and the scientific nature of teaching decisions. Looking forward, it is essential to deepen the integration of multimodal data, improve the legal framework for educational data governance, and cultivate the digital literacy of teachers and students to achieve a dual breakthrough in “large-scale personalized teaching” and “equitable education,” providing a systematic solution for the quality revolution in higher education.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
周磊. 数字化转型背景下高校数据治理问题与对策研究[J]. 中国新通信, 2024, 26(23): 100-102.
|
|
[2]
|
付珍珍, 熊秋娥. 数字化转型背景下高校数据治理优化路径研究[J]. 中国教育技术装备, 2024(22): 22-25, 37.
|
|
[3]
|
潘燕红. 数字化转型浪潮下高校数据治理框架设计[J]. 科技视界, 2024, 14(7): 28-31.
|
|
[4]
|
杨明成. 数字化转型背景下高校数据治理研究[J]. 网络安全技术与应用, 2024(1): 89-92.
|
|
[5]
|
刘海峰, 徐丽丽. 基于新工科的大数据技术教学创新实践分析[J]. 集成电路应用, 2024, 41(11): 172-173.
|
|
[6]
|
周琦. 大数据技术助力高等教育精准化发展的探索与实践[J]. 汉字文化, 2025(6): 42-44.
|
|
[7]
|
吕增生, 张柳, 高振宇. 大数据技术在大学教育中的应用与影响研究[J]. 科技经济市场, 2024(12): 146-148.
|
|
[8]
|
李会民, 马桂英. 《大数据技术与应用》课程教学探索[J]. 北华航天工业学院学报, 2025, 35(2): 32-34.
|
|
[9]
|
李青青. 新工科背景下数据科学与大数据技术专业建设及人才培养策略探析[J]. 老字号品牌营销, 2024(1): 191-194.
|
|
[10]
|
曾霖, 杨璧菀. 新工科背景下的线上线下混合式教学改革研究与探索——以“数据科学与大数据技术”专业为例[J]. 现代信息科技, 2024, 8(4): 190-194.
|
|
[11]
|
朱灵龙, 曹海啸, 阚希, 张红燕. 新工科背景下应用型本科高校数据科学与大数据技术专业建设研究[J]. 信息系统工程, 2024(3): 166-169.
|
|
[12]
|
孙明瑞, 刘静, 吴艳. 新工科模式下数据科学与大数据技术专业建设的探索与实践——以嘉兴大学为例[J]. 嘉兴学院学报, 2024, 36(2): 120-124.
|
|
[13]
|
闫芳序, 王剑辉, 于涧, 于泽翔. 基于大数据技术与云计算的智慧校园应用研究[J]. 信息与电脑(理论版), 2023, 35(24): 233-236.
|
|
[14]
|
齐阳. 大数据时代高校审计全覆盖探讨[J]. 营销界, 2024(4): 32-34.
|
|
[15]
|
孔艳芳, 刘建旭, 赵忠秀. 数据要素市场化配置研究: 内涵解构、运行机理与实践路径[J]. 经济学家, 2021(11): 24-32.
|