生态系统视角下家校合作对学业成绩的影响:教师支持与学校适应的链式中介研究
Home-School Collaboration and Academic Achievement: A Chain Mediation Study of Teacher Support and School Adaptation from an Ecosystem Perspective
摘要: 在“双减”背景下,如何提高学生学业成绩这一问题得到了广泛关注。家庭和学校作为初中生成长过程中的关键环境,其协同作用对学生的发展至关重要。本研究基于生态系统理论及社会支持理论,构建了“家校合作→教师支持→学校适应→学业成绩”链式中介模型,探讨了家校合作对学业成就的影响机制。研究采用中国教育追踪(CEPS) 2014~2015学年追访数据,最终纳入6001名初中生样本,运用结构方程模型以及Bootstrap方法进行分析。结果发现,家校合作对学业成绩的直接效应不显著,但教师支持与学校适应表现出显著的间接效应,此外,二者还构成了链式中介作用。研究结果揭示了家校合作促进学业成绩的心理机制,为制定政策及提升学生学业成绩方案方面提供了理论支持与实证依据。
Abstract: Under the background of China’s “Double Reduction” policy, how to improve students’ academic achievement has received widespread attention. As critical environments in the developmental process of junior high school students, the collaborative functioning of families and schools plays a vital role in shaping student outcomes. Based on ecological systems theory and social support theory, this study constructed a serial mediation model—“home-school collaboration → teacher support → school adjustment → academic achievement”—to examine the mechanism through which home-school collaboration influences academic outcomes. Using data from the 2014~2015 follow-up wave of the China Education Panel Survey (CEPS), a total of 6001 junior high school students were included in the analysis. Structural equation modeling and bootstrapping methods were employed. Results indicated that home-school collaboration did not have a significant direct effect on academic achievement, but showed significant indirect effects via teacher support and school adjustment. Furthermore, a significant serial mediation effect was also identified. These findings illuminate the psychological pathways through which home-school collaboration facilitates academic performance, providing both theoretical insights and empirical evidence for policy-making and academic support strategies.
文章引用:肖靖愉 (2025). 生态系统视角下家校合作对学业成绩的影响:教师支持与学校适应的链式中介研究. 心理学进展, 15(8), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2025.158470

参考文献

[1] 陈淑梅, 张琬, 李燕(2020). 父母参与对儿童学校适应的影响研究: 教师支持和儿童自我效能感的多重中介效应. 中国特殊教育, (12), 76-82, 75.
[2] 陈曦萌, 谭小凤(2024). 教师支持如何影响初中生外化问题行为——基于CEPS数据的实证研究. 潍坊工程职业学院学报, 37(2), 100-108.
[3] 付卫东, 张钰迪, 刘尊贤(2022). 《家庭教育促进法》视域下父母支持对学生学业压力的影响——基于家校合作的调节效应分析. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 44(4), 67-78.[CrossRef
[4] 韩仁生, 王晓琳(2009). 家长参与与小学生学习自我效能的关系研究. 心理科学, 32(2), 430-432.[CrossRef
[5] 韩悦, 周正(2023). 父母参与对随迁子女学业成绩的影响——学校适应的中介作用. 教育测量与评价, (2), 81-91.[CrossRef
[6] 何珺子, 王小军(2017). 认知能力和非认知能力的教育回报率—基于国际成人能力测评项目的实证研究. 经济与管理研究, 38(5), 66-74.[CrossRef
[7] 何瑞珠(1999). 家长参与子女的教育: 文化资本与社会资本的阐释. 教育学报, (26), 2.
[8] 侯静(2012). 学校适应的界定和测量的综述. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 99-104.
[9] 黄婷婷, 刘松涛(2025). 感知教师情感支持与行为投入的关系: 自我效能与学业韧性的链式中介作用. 现代外语, 48(3), 352-363.[CrossRef
[10] 赖伟才(2023). 高质量发展背景下高技能人才社会适应能力调查研究——以高职毕业生为例. 现代职业教育, (22), 157-160.
[11] 李佳哲, 胡咏梅(2023). 家校合作对城乡初中生学业表现的影响研究. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 22(1), 111-122.[CrossRef
[12] 李玲, 袁圣兰(2019). 家庭教育中家长主体参与和子女学业成绩之间的关系探究——基于链式中介效应分析. 中国电化教育, (7), 107-114.
[13] 李文道, 邹泓, 赵霞(2003). 初中生的社会支持与学校适应的关系. 心理发展与教育, (3), 73-81.
[14] 梁兴丽, 何津, 周佶俊, 刘萍萍(2020). 认知能力对学业成绩的影响: 有中介的调节模型. 心理发展与教育, 36(4), 449-461.[CrossRef
[15] 林楠, 龙女, 张文, 黄佳佳, 陈加(2019). 家长对学校的态度与中学生学业成绩的关系: 心理素质和学习习惯的链式中介作用. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 44(12), 119-124.[CrossRef
[16] 路海东, 张慧秀, 袁坤锋, 陈婷, 张冬梅(2016). 父母和教师支持与小学生学业成绩的关系: 自我调节学习的中介作用. 牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (6), 127-131.[CrossRef
[17] 马忠虎(1999). 家校合作(P. 59). 教育科学出版社.
[18] 沈可, 张会晴(2024). “双减”政策实施影响学生学业成绩吗?——基于社会学制度主义视角的Tukey多重比较检验. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 45(5), 122-130.[CrossRef
[19] 魏昶, 喻承甫, 赵存会, 王贞元, 刘阳, 王菊(2016). 学校归属感在学校氛围和留守儿童学业成绩间的中介作用. 中国学校卫生, 37(7), 1103-1105.[CrossRef
[20] 杨奎臣, 贾爱宾, 郭西(2020). 教师支持对流动儿童学校适应的影响及其机制研究——基于CEPS(2014-2015)数据的实证分析. 教育与经济, (1), 77-86.
[21] 姚逸斌(2016). 初中生学业压力、学业压力易感性与焦虑、抑郁及自杀意念的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 重庆师范大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201602&filename=1016140648.nh&v=
[22] 姚远, 刘自团, 程诚(2024). 教师行为对初中生学业能力的影响——基于教育公平视角的考察. 当代青年研究, (4), 99-112.
[23] 张丽杰, 莫宗赵, 周莹(2021). 父母自主支持对初中生数学学业成绩的影响——一个有调节的中介模型. 教育测量与评价, (8), 54-62.[CrossRef
[24] 张永强, 赵佶旺(2024). 非学科类校外培训能让儿童更好适应学校生活吗——基于非认知能力的中介效应分析. 现代教育论丛, (4), 55-68.
[25] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.[CrossRef
[26] Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.[CrossRef
[27] Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.[CrossRef
[28] Epstein, J. L. (2001). School and Family Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Westview Press.
[29] Garbacz, S. A., Sheridan, S. M., Koziol, N. A., Kwon, K., & Holmes, S. R. (2015). Congruence in Parent-Teacher Communication: Implications for the Efficacy of CBC for Students with Behavioral Concerns. School Psychology Review, 44, 150-168.[CrossRef
[30] Gijselaers, H. J. M., Meijs, C., Neroni, J., Kirschner, P. A., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2017). Updating and Not Shifting Predicts Learning Performance in Young and Middle‐Aged Adults. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11, 190-200.[CrossRef
[31] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
[32] Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (1994). A New Generation of Evidence: The Family Is Critical to Student Achievement. National Committee for Citizens in Education.
[33] Lee, J., & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and Social-Contextual Factors in K-12 Academic Performance: An Integrative Perspective on Student Learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 185-202.[CrossRef
[34] Lei, H., Wang, X., Chiu, M. M., Du, M., & Xie, T. (2023). Teacher-student Relationship and Academic Achievement in China: Evidence from a Three-Level Meta-analysis. School Psychology International, 44, 68-101.[CrossRef
[35] Lv, B., Lv, L., Yan, Z., & Luo, L. (2019). The Relationship between Parental Involvement in Education and Children’s Academic/Emotion Profiles: A Person-Centered Approach. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 175-182.[CrossRef
[36] Madjar, N., & Cohen-Malayev, M. (2016). Perceived School Climate across the Transition from Elementary to Middle School. School Psychology Quarterly, 31, 270-288.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Park, G., & Kim, J. (2024). Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement of Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of School Adjustment. School Psychology International, 45, 447-462.[CrossRef
[38] Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher-Child Relationships and the Process of Adjusting to School. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1992, 61-80.[CrossRef
[39] Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does Perceived Teacher Affective Support Matter for Middle School Students in Mathematics Classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50, 235-255.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.[CrossRef
[41] Stright, A. D., & Yeo, K. L. (2014). Maternal Parenting Styles, School Involvement, and Children’s School Achievement and Conduct in Singapore. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 301-314.[CrossRef
[42] Wang, M., Hill, N. E., & Hofkens, T. (2014). Parental Involvement and African American and European American Adolescents’ Academic, Behavioral, and Emotional Development in Secondary School. Child Development, 85, 2151-2168.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Xu, M., Kushner Benson, S. N., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Steiner, R. P. (2010). The Relationship between Parental Involvement, Self-Regulated Learning, and Reading Achievement of Fifth Graders: A Path Analysis Using the ECLS-K Database. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 237-269.[CrossRef